Full Text of HB2750 99th General Assembly
HB2750eng 99TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY |
| | HB2750 Engrossed | | LRB099 07715 RLC 27848 b |
|
| 1 | | AN ACT concerning cannabis.
| 2 | | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
| 3 | | represented in the General Assembly:
| 4 | | Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the | 5 | | Cannabis Study Act. | 6 | | Section 5. Findings.
| 7 | | (a) Numerous localities throughout this State impose a | 8 | | civil fine for the possession of cannabis. The states of | 9 | | Alaska, California, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, | 10 | | Mississippi, Nebraska, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont | 11 | | impose civil fines, based on specified low gram quantities of | 12 | | cannabis. On August 29, 2013 the U.S. Department of Justice | 13 | | issued a "Guidance Regarding Marijuana Enforcement" Memorandum | 14 | | for all United States Attorneys reaffirming that "the | 15 | | Department of Justice has not historically devoted resources | 16 | | for prosecuting individuals whose conduct is limited to | 17 | | possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use on | 18 | | private property". | 19 | | (b) A majority of voters in the states of Alaska (2014), | 20 | | Oregon (2014), Colorado (2012), and Washington (2012) | 21 | | legalized the possession of cannabis by any person 21 years of | 22 | | age or older, and tax and regulate cannabis in a manner similar | 23 | | to alcohol. Despite existing federal law prohibitions |
| | | HB2750 Engrossed | - 2 - | LRB099 07715 RLC 27848 b |
|
| 1 | | regarding the purchase and possession of cannabis, on August | 2 | | 29, 2013, the U.S. Attorney General publicly stated that the | 3 | | Department of Justice would allow Washington and Colorado to | 4 | | create a system that would regulate and implement legalization | 5 | | of the use of cannabis for adults. | 6 | | (c) Numerous polls, including a 2013 Pew Research Center | 7 | | poll found that a majority of Americans favor legalizing the | 8 | | use of cannabis, with an 11 point rise since 2010. | 9 | | (d) During the 42 years since the enactment of the Cannabis | 10 | | Control Act, attitudes in this State regarding the use of | 11 | | cannabis have changed; Public Act 98-122, the Compassionate Use | 12 | | of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act, of the 98th General | 13 | | Assembly, authorized physicians to prescribe cannabis for | 14 | | therapeutic use in patients suffering from certain types of | 15 | | medical conditions. | 16 | | (e) It is appropriate for this State to consider the | 17 | | regulation and taxing of cannabis, in a manner similar to | 18 | | alcohol and tobacco, for individuals 21 years of age or older. | 19 | | (f) If the General Assembly wishes to consider regulating | 20 | | and taxing cannabis, in a manner similar to alcohol or tobacco, | 21 | | for individuals 21 years of age or older, that decision should | 22 | | be based upon facts which establish that the regulation and | 23 | | taxation of cannabis is in the best interest of the people of | 24 | | the State of Illinois.
| 25 | | Section 10. Regulation and taxation of cannabis in a manner |
| | | HB2750 Engrossed | - 3 - | LRB099 07715 RLC 27848 b |
|
| 1 | | similar to alcohol and tobacco for individuals over 21 years of | 2 | | age or older.
| 3 | | (a) Before considering regulation and taxation of cannabis | 4 | | in a manner similar to alcohol and tobacco for individuals over | 5 | | 21 years of age or older, the General Assembly shall direct the | 6 | | Sentencing Policy Advisory Council to: | 7 | | (1) determine the effect regulation and taxation would | 8 | | have on law enforcement resources; | 9 | | (2) determine the impact regulation would have on the | 10 | | rate of arrests, predisposition detention, and sentencing;
| 11 | | (3) review approaches a cannabis regulation law could | 12 | | take regarding drug-free workplace policies and procedures | 13 | | and what effect the different approaches would have;
| 14 | | (4) determine the effect regulation and taxation would | 15 | | have on existing criminal laws, including the Cannabis | 16 | | Control Act;
| 17 | | (5) review approaches states have taken to reduce risks | 18 | | associated with the operation of motor vehicles by | 19 | | individuals impaired by intoxicants including but not | 20 | | limited to cannabis, and what effect the different | 21 | | approaches have had on rates of fatalities;
| 22 | | (6) determine to what extent the taxation and | 23 | | regulation of cannabis may generate employment and revenue | 24 | | in this State if at all;
| 25 | | (7) determine the regulatory and taxing system needed | 26 | | for the licensing of entities to sell cannabis and the |
| | | HB2750 Engrossed | - 4 - | LRB099 07715 RLC 27848 b |
|
| 1 | | licensing of entities to grow cannabis;
| 2 | | (8) determine the product labeling, quality control, | 3 | | and taxing regulations needed;
| 4 | | (9) compare the health effects of cannabis, alcohol, | 5 | | and prescription drugs on the individual and community as | 6 | | it relates to violence, risk-taking, addiction, cancer, | 7 | | overdose, and mortality;
| 8 | | (10) determine the impact that existing laws on | 9 | | cannabis possession have on rates of crime and violence; | 10 | | and
| 11 | | (11) any other relevant analysis regarding the impact | 12 | | on the public safety and welfare of the citizens of this | 13 | | State.
| 14 | | (b) The Illinois Sentencing Policy Advisory Council shall | 15 | | report to the General Assembly its findings on or before | 16 | | December 20, 2015. | 17 | | Section 15. Scope and partnership. The Illinois Sentencing | 18 | | Policy Advisory Council shall consider factors and work in | 19 | | conjunction with, and obtain input from, any individual, | 20 | | agency, association, and research institution, deemed | 21 | | appropriate by the Council.
|
|