Public Act 099-0874 Public Act 0874 99TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY |
Public Act 099-0874 | HB5613 Enrolled | LRB099 18522 SLF 42901 b |
|
| AN ACT concerning the Law Enforcement Information Task | Force Act.
| Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
| represented in the General Assembly:
| Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Law | Enforcement Information Task Force Act. | Section 5. Task Force; purpose. There shall be created a | Law Enforcement Information Task Force to study and make | recommendations regarding criminal discovery and law | enforcement information sharing. | Section 10. Members. |
(a) The Task Force shall consist of the following members | who will not be compensated: | (1) the Director of the Administrative Office of the | Illinois Courts, or his or her designee; | (2) the Attorney General, or his or her designee; | (3) the Director of State Police, or his or her | designee; | (3.5) the Secretary of the Department of Innovation and | Technology, or his or her designee; | (4) a State's Attorney from a county with more than | 3,000,000 residents, or his or her designee; |
| (5) a public defender from a county with more than | 3,000,000 residents, or his or her designee; | (6) a representative of the Office of the State's | Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor; | (7) a representative of the Office of the State | Appellate Defender; | (8) a representative of the Illinois State's Attorneys | Association, appointed by the Governor; | (9) a representative of the Illinois Public Defender | Association, appointed by the Governor; | (10) a representative from the Illinois Judges | Association, appointed by the Speaker of the House of | Representatives; | (11) a representative from the Illinois State Bar | Association, appointed by the Minority Leader of the House | of Representatives; | (12) a representative of the Chicago Bar Association, | appointed by the Senate President; | (13) a representative from the Illinois Sheriffs' | Association, appointed by the Senate Minority Leader; | (14) a representative from the Illinois Association of | Chiefs of Police, appointed by the Governor; | (15) the chief of police from a municipality with more | than 1,000,000 residents, or his or her designee; | (16) the sheriff from a county with more than 3,000,000 | residents, or his or her designee; and |
| (17) the Director of the Illinois Criminal Justice | Information Authority, or his or her designee. | (b) The Law Enforcement Information Task Force shall be | established within the Illinois Criminal Justice Information | Authority and the Illinois Criminal Justice Information | Authority shall serve as the technology and policy advisor to | assist the Task Force. The Illinois Criminal Justice | Information Authority shall work with State and local criminal | justice agencies to promote information sharing systems | through its access to technical expertise and its grant-making | powers for technology information projects. The Illinois | Criminal Justice Information Authority shall provide staff to | serve as a liaison between the Law Enforcement Information Task | Force and its stakeholders to provide guidance in criminal | justice information sharing, best practices and strategies, | and to effectuate the mission of the Task Force. | (c) The members of the Task Force shall elect a chair of | the Task Force. The chair of the Task Force shall convene the | first meeting of the Task Force on or before August 31, 2016. | The Task Force shall meet at least twice a month thereafter | until it completes its duties under this Act, or until December | 31, 2016, whichever is earlier. | Section 15. Duties of the Task Force.
| (a) The Task Force may consult with experts to provide | assistance as necessary. |
| (b) The Task Force shall: | (1) analyze the criminal discovery process in this | State to determine the actual costs, including, but not | limited to, labor, materials, time, and other tangible | costs of the current criminal discovery process to | determine how technology can improve the process for all | participants; | (2) analyze the process for information sharing, | including, but not limited to, an analysis of record | management systems, computer aided dispatch systems, and | other technology used to process information between law | enforcement agencies in this State to determine the actual | costs of the current process; | (3) analyze the current information sharing process | between law enforcement agencies to determine how | technology can improve the process for all participants; | (4) determine which prosecutors' offices obtain all | law enforcement discoverable evidence in an electronic | format, which prosecutors' offices will soon be able to | obtain all law enforcement discoverable evidence in an | electronic format, and which prosecutors' offices will not | have that ability at any point in the future without | assistance; | (5) determine the barriers for those prosecutors' | offices that will not be able to obtain law enforcement | discoverable evidence in an electronic format without |
| assistance; | (6) determine which law enforcement agencies obtain | and utilize data entirely, or partially, in an electronic | format, which law enforcement agencies will soon be able to | obtain and utilize data entirely in an electronic format, | and which law enforcement agencies will not be able to | obtain and utilize data entirely in an electronic format at | any point in the future without assistance; | (7) study how a single statewide criminal information | sharing system or other technology may improve electronic | discovery or electronic redaction; | (8) study how a statewide standardized law enforcement | reporting form that can be easily redacted may improve the | criminal discovery process; | (9) study the short-term needs for law enforcement | agencies and State's Attorneys to facilitate greater use of | electronic discovery and information sharing; | (10) study whether a single standardized statewide | case record management system or other law enforcement | technology would provide better and additional access to | information for law enforcement; | (11) determine whether a single standardized statewide | case record management system or other electronic | discovery technology would provide for a better and more | efficient criminal discovery process and offer any cost | savings; |
| (12) determine whether a single standardized statewide | case record management system or other information sharing | technology would provide for a better and more efficient | law enforcement information sharing process and offer any | cost savings; | (13) suggest an alternative funding process to the | State's current method to pay for criminal discovery costs; | (14) suggest an alternative funding process to the | State's current method to pay for law enforcement | information sharing costs; | (15) determine which executive branch agency, judicial | branch agency, or quasi-governmental organization is best | suited to serve as a conduit and coordinator for a | statewide criminal electronic discovery system; and | (16) determine which executive branch agency, judicial | branch agency, or quasi-governmental organization is best | suited to serve as a conduit and coordinator for a | statewide criminal information sharing system. | Section 20. Preliminary and final report. | (a) The Task Force shall provide a preliminary report to | the Governor and General Assembly on or before December 15, | 2016, if the final report is not completed by then. | (b) The Task Force shall issue a final report to the | Governor and General Assembly on or before January 15, 2017. | The report shall include recommendations for legislation, use |
| of technology, and other non-legislative processes that would | improve the criminal discovery process and law enforcement | information sharing.
| Section 25. Repeal. This Act is repealed on February 1, | 2017. | Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon | becoming law. |
Effective Date: 08/22/2016
|