Full Text of HR0620 95th General Assembly
HR0620enr 95TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
|
|
|
HR0620 Enrolled |
|
LRB095 12794 CMK 38209 r |
|
| 1 |
| HOUSE RESOLUTION 620
| 2 |
| WHEREAS, The British Petroleum oil refinery in Whiting, | 3 |
| Indiana is planning an expansion that would increase the | 4 |
| refinery's discharges into Lake Michigan significantly, | 5 |
| including 54% more ammonia (for a total discharge of 1,584 | 6 |
| pounds of ammonia per day) and 35% more total suspended solids | 7 |
| (for a total discharge of 4,925 pounds of total suspended | 8 |
| solids per day) on a daily basis, running contrary to years of | 9 |
| efforts to clean up the Great Lakes; and
| 10 |
| WHEREAS, The beaches of Lake Michigan provide a
significant | 11 |
| source of recreation, tourism, and drinking water
for the State | 12 |
| of Illinois and other states bordering the Lake;
and | 13 |
| WHEREAS, Last year, 81% of Illinois beaches were declared
| 14 |
| unsafe due to algae and other pollution problems; and | 15 |
| WHEREAS, Ammonia promotes algae blooms that can kill fish | 16 |
| in the Lake; and
| 17 |
| WHEREAS, The increased discharge into the Lake runs counter | 18 |
| to a provision of the federal Clean Water Act that prohibits | 19 |
| any downgrade in water quality near a pollution source, such as | 20 |
| the British Petroleum refinery; and |
|
|
|
HR0620 Enrolled |
- 2 - |
LRB095 12794 CMK 38209 r |
|
| 1 |
| WHEREAS, Indiana State regulators are allowing British | 2 |
| Petroleum to install equipment that mixes its toxic waste with | 3 |
| clean lake water about 200 feet offshore, and actively diluting | 4 |
| pollution in Lake Michigan in this way is banned under Indiana | 5 |
| law; and | 6 |
| WHEREAS, Environmental regulators remain unsure about the | 7 |
| ecological effects of the relatively new refining process that | 8 |
| British Petroleum plans to use and the increased discharge into | 9 |
| Lake Michigan; and | 10 |
| WHEREAS, The United States Environmental Protection Agency | 11 |
| has not objected to the State of Indiana's decision to allow | 12 |
| the increased discharge by British Petroleum; and | 13 |
| WHEREAS, States rely on the federal government to enforce | 14 |
| interstate water quality, the federal Clean Water Act has | 15 |
| assisted states in cleaning up polluted waters and protecting | 16 |
| unpolluted waters, and states need new tools in addition to the | 17 |
| existing Clean Water Act to help protect ground and surface | 18 |
| waters from out-of-state pollution sources; and | 19 |
| WHEREAS, The federal Clean Air Act requires states to take | 20 |
| certain actions when permitting new sources of air pollution | 21 |
| that may increase pollution in nearby states and provides | 22 |
| remedies for states to address air pollution coming from |
|
|
|
HR0620 Enrolled |
- 3 - |
LRB095 12794 CMK 38209 r |
|
| 1 |
| out-of-state sources; therefore, be it
| 2 |
| RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE | 3 |
| NINETY-FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we | 4 |
| urge British Petroleum to review and reconsider the wastewater | 5 |
| treatment facilities proposed to serve the expansion and | 6 |
| reconfiguration of its Whiting Refinery with the specific | 7 |
| intent to supplement or enhance treatment efficiencies to | 8 |
| eliminate or reduce the projected increases of ammonia nitrogen | 9 |
| and total suspended solids discharged into Lake Michigan; and | 10 |
| be it further | 11 |
| RESOLVED, That we strongly urge the United States | 12 |
| Environmental Protection Agency to follow a strict | 13 |
| interpretation of the federal Clean Water Act to minimize any | 14 |
| additional pollution into Lake Michigan; and be it further
| 15 |
| RESOLVED, That we urge the United States Environmental | 16 |
| Protection Agency to prohibit the Whiting, Indiana British | 17 |
| Petroleum refinery from increasing the refinery's current | 18 |
| discharges of ammonia and total suspended solids into Lake | 19 |
| Michigan until the ecological and environmental impact of the | 20 |
| increased discharges is fully understood by federal and state | 21 |
| environmental regulators; and be it further
| 22 |
| RESOLVED, That we urge the Illinois delegation to the |
|
|
|
HR0620 Enrolled |
- 4 - |
LRB095 12794 CMK 38209 r |
|
| 1 |
| United States Congress to take legislative action against any | 2 |
| planned increase in the discharge of pollution into Lake | 3 |
| Michigan that is contrary to the federal Clean Water Act and | 4 |
| threatens the health of the environment of this State; and be | 5 |
| it further | 6 |
| RESOLVED, That we urge the United States Congress to enact | 7 |
| Clean Water Act legislation requiring states to take certain | 8 |
| actions when permitting new sources of water pollution that may | 9 |
| increase pollution in nearby states and providing remedies for | 10 |
| states to address water pollution coming from out-of-state | 11 |
| sources; and be it further | 12 |
| RESOLVED, That we urge the United States Environmental | 13 |
| Protection Agency to strengthen federal regulations to require | 14 |
| each state that permits a new source of water pollution to | 15 |
| provide written notice to all nearby states whose water quality | 16 |
| may be degraded by the new source at least 60 days before the | 17 |
| new source begins discharging pollution; and be it further | 18 |
| RESOLVED, That we encourage the federal government to take | 19 |
| action to give one state the right to bring an action in | 20 |
| federal court against another state that is causing or | 21 |
| contributing to water pollution that exceeds water quality | 22 |
| standards or otherwise adversely impacts the drinking water or | 23 |
| recreational uses of water in the first state; and be it |
|
|
|
HR0620 Enrolled |
- 5 - |
LRB095 12794 CMK 38209 r |
|
| 1 |
| further | 2 |
| RESOLVED, That we urge the United States Environmental | 3 |
| Protection Agency to increase enforcement of existing clean | 4 |
| water laws to protect state waters from out-of-state pollution | 5 |
| sources, especially the Clean Water Act provision that | 6 |
| prohibits any decline in water quality even if limits on | 7 |
| pollution discharges are met; and be it further | 8 |
| RESOLVED, That a suitable copy of this resolution be | 9 |
| delivered to the administrator of the United States | 10 |
| Environmental Protection Agency, Stephen L. Johnson, and to the | 11 |
| Great Lakes National Program Manager for the United States | 12 |
| Environmental Protection Agency, Mary A. Gade, to each member | 13 |
| of the Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin delegations | 14 |
| to the United States Congress, and to the governors and state | 15 |
| legislative leaders of Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
|
|