Full Text of HB3986 96th General Assembly
HB3986enr 96TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
|
|
|
HB3986 Enrolled |
|
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
| 1 |
| AN ACT concerning local government.
| 2 |
| Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
| 3 |
| represented in the General Assembly:
| 4 |
| Section 5. The Chicago Park District Act is amended by | 5 |
| adding Sections 26.10-4, 26.10-5, 26.10-6, 26.10-7, 26.10-8, | 6 |
| 26.10-9, 26.10-10, and 26.10-11 as follows: | 7 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-4 new) | 8 |
| Sec. 26.10-4. Definitions. The following terms, whenever | 9 |
| used or referred to in this Act, have the following meaning | 10 |
| unless the context requires a different meaning: | 11 |
| "Delivery system" means the design and construction | 12 |
| approach used to develop and construct a project. | 13 |
| "Design-bid-build" means the traditional delivery system | 14 |
| used on public
projects that incorporates the Local Government | 15 |
| Professional Services Selection Act (50 ILCS 510/) and the
| 16 |
| principles of competitive selection.
| 17 |
| "Design-build" means a delivery system that provides | 18 |
| responsibility within a
single contract for the furnishing of | 19 |
| architecture, engineering, land surveying
and related services | 20 |
| as required, and the labor, materials, equipment, and
other | 21 |
| construction services for the project.
| 22 |
| "Design-build contract" means a contract for a public | 23 |
| project under this Act
between the Chicago Park District and a |
|
|
|
HB3986 Enrolled |
- 2 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
| 1 |
| design-build entity to furnish
architecture,
engineering, land | 2 |
| surveying, landscape architecture, and related services as | 3 |
| required, and to furnish
the labor, materials, equipment, and | 4 |
| other construction services for the
project. The design-build | 5 |
| contract may be conditioned upon subsequent
refinements in | 6 |
| scope and price and may allow the Chicago Park District to
make
| 7 |
| modifications in the project scope without invalidating the | 8 |
| design-build
contract.
| 9 |
| "Design-build entity" means any individual, sole | 10 |
| proprietorship, firm,
partnership, joint venture, corporation, | 11 |
| professional corporation, or other
entity that proposes to | 12 |
| design and construct any public project under this Act.
A | 13 |
| design-build entity and associated design-build professionals | 14 |
| shall conduct themselves in accordance with the laws of this | 15 |
| State and the related provisions of the Illinois Administrative | 16 |
| Code, as referenced by the licensed design professionals Acts | 17 |
| of this State.
| 18 |
| "Design professional" means any individual, sole | 19 |
| proprietorship, firm,
partnership, joint venture, corporation, | 20 |
| professional corporation, or other
entity that offers services | 21 |
| under the Illinois Architecture Practice Act of
1989 (225 ILCS | 22 |
| 305/), the Professional Engineering Practice Act of 1989 (225
| 23 |
| ILCS 325/),
the Structural Engineering Licensing Act of 1989 | 24 |
| (225 ILCS 340/), or the
Illinois Professional
Land Surveyor Act | 25 |
| of 1989 (225 ILCS 330/).
| 26 |
| "Landscape architect design professional" means any |
|
|
|
HB3986 Enrolled |
- 3 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
| 1 |
| person, sole proprietorship, or entity such as a partnership, | 2 |
| professional service corporation, or corporation that offers | 3 |
| services under the Illinois Landscape Architecture Act of 1989. | 4 |
| "Evaluation criteria" means the requirements for the | 5 |
| separate phases of the
selection process for design-build | 6 |
| proposals as defined in this Act and may include the | 7 |
| specialized
experience, technical qualifications and | 8 |
| competence, capacity to perform, past
performance, experience | 9 |
| with similar projects, assignment of personnel to the
project, | 10 |
| and other appropriate factors. Price may not be used as a | 11 |
| factor in
the evaluation of Phase I proposals.
| 12 |
| "Proposal" means the offer to enter into a design-build | 13 |
| contract as submitted
by a design-build entity in accordance | 14 |
| with this Act.
| 15 |
| "Request for proposal" means the document used by the | 16 |
| Chicago Park District
to solicit
proposals for a design-build | 17 |
| contract.
| 18 |
| "Scope and performance criteria" means the requirements | 19 |
| for the public
project, including but not limited to, the | 20 |
| intended usage, capacity, size,
scope, quality and performance | 21 |
| standards, life-cycle costs, and other
programmatic criteria | 22 |
| that are expressed in performance-oriented and
quantifiable | 23 |
| specifications and drawings that can be reasonably inferred and
| 24 |
| are suited to allow a design-build entity to develop a | 25 |
| proposal.
| 26 |
| "Guaranteed maximum price" means a form of contract in |
|
|
|
HB3986 Enrolled |
- 4 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
| 1 |
| which compensation may vary according to the scope of work | 2 |
| involved but in any case may not exceed an agreed total amount.
| 3 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-5 new) | 4 |
| Sec. 26.10-5. Authorization for design-build; | 5 |
| advertisement. | 6 |
| (a) The Chicago Park District shall have the power to enter | 7 |
| into design-build contracts. In addition to the requirements | 8 |
| set forth in its ordinances, the Chicago Park District shall | 9 |
| advertise a design-build solicitation at least once in a daily | 10 |
| newspaper of general circulation in Cook County. The date that | 11 |
| Phase I submissions by design-build entities are due must be at | 12 |
| least 14 calendar days after the date the newspaper | 13 |
| advertisement for design-build proposals is first published. | 14 |
| The advertisement shall identify the design-build project, the | 15 |
| due date, the place and time for Phase I submissions, and the | 16 |
| place where proposers can obtain a complete copy of the request | 17 |
| for design-build proposals, including the criteria for | 18 |
| evaluation and the scope and performance criteria. The Chicago | 19 |
| Park District is not precluded from using other media or from | 20 |
| placing advertisements in addition to the one required under | 21 |
| this subsection. | 22 |
| (b) The Chicago Park District may reject any and all bids | 23 |
| and proposals received and may readvertise for bids or issue a | 24 |
| new request for design-build proposals. |
|
|
|
HB3986 Enrolled |
- 5 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
| 1 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-6 new) | 2 |
| Sec. 26.10-6. Solicitation of design-build proposals. | 3 |
| (a) When the Chicago Park District elects to use the | 4 |
| design-build delivery
method, it must
issue a notice of intent | 5 |
| to receive proposals for the project at
least 14 days before | 6 |
| issuing the request for the proposal. The Chicago Park District
| 7 |
| must publish the advance notice in a daily newspaper of general | 8 |
| circulation in Cook County. The
Chicago Park District is | 9 |
| encouraged to use publication of the notice in related | 10 |
| construction
industry service publications. A brief | 11 |
| description of the proposed procurement
must be included in the | 12 |
| notice. The Chicago Park District must provide a
copy of the
| 13 |
| request for proposal to any party requesting a copy. | 14 |
| (b) The request for proposal shall be prepared for each | 15 |
| project and must
contain, without limitation, the following | 16 |
| information: | 17 |
| (1) A preliminary schedule for the completion of the | 18 |
| contract.
| 19 |
| (2) The proposed budget for the project, the source of | 20 |
| funds, and the
currently available funds at the time the | 21 |
| request for proposal is submitted.
| 22 |
| (3) Prequalification criteria for design-build | 23 |
| entities wishing to submit
proposals.
The Chicago Park | 24 |
| District shall include, at a minimum, its normal
| 25 |
| prequalification, licensing, registration, and other | 26 |
| requirements, but nothing
contained herein precludes the |
|
|
|
HB3986 Enrolled |
- 6 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
| 1 |
| use of additional prequalification criteria
by the Chicago | 2 |
| Park District.
| 3 |
| (4) Material requirements of the contract, including | 4 |
| but not limited to,
the proposed terms and conditions, | 5 |
| required performance and payment bonds,
insurance, and the | 6 |
| entity's plan to comply with the utilization goals | 7 |
| established by the corporate authorities of the Chicago | 8 |
| Park District for minority and women business enterprises | 9 |
| and to comply with Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human | 10 |
| Rights Act.
| 11 |
| (5) The performance criteria.
| 12 |
| (6) The evaluation criteria for each phase of the | 13 |
| solicitation.
| 14 |
| (7) The number of entities that will be considered for | 15 |
| the technical and
cost
evaluation phase.
| 16 |
| (c) The Chicago Park District may include any other | 17 |
| relevant information
that it
chooses to supply. The | 18 |
| design-build entity shall be entitled to rely upon the
accuracy | 19 |
| of this documentation in the development of its proposal. | 20 |
| (d) The date that proposals are due must be at least 21 | 21 |
| calendar days after
the date of the issuance of the request for | 22 |
| proposal. In the event the cost of
the project
is estimated to | 23 |
| exceed $12,000,000, then the proposal due date must be at least
| 24 |
| 28 calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request | 25 |
| for proposal.
The Chicago Park District shall include in the | 26 |
| request for proposal a
minimum of 30 days
to develop the Phase |
|
|
|
HB3986 Enrolled |
- 7 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
| 1 |
| II submissions after the selection of entities
from the Phase I | 2 |
| evaluation is completed. | 3 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-7 new) | 4 |
| Sec. 26.10-7. Development of design-build scope and | 5 |
| performance criteria. | 6 |
| (a) The Chicago Park District shall develop, with the | 7 |
| assistance of a
licensed design professional or a landscape | 8 |
| architect design professional, as appropriate, a request
for | 9 |
| proposal, which shall include scope and performance criteria.
| 10 |
| The scope and performance criteria must be in sufficient detail | 11 |
| and contain
adequate information to reasonably apprise the | 12 |
| qualified design-build entities
of the Chicago Park District's | 13 |
| overall programmatic needs and goals,
including criteria and | 14 |
| preliminary design plans,
general budget parameters, schedule, | 15 |
| and delivery requirements. | 16 |
| (b) Each request for proposal shall also include a | 17 |
| description of the level
of design to be provided in the | 18 |
| proposals. This description must include the
scope and type of | 19 |
| renderings, drawings, and specifications that, at a minimum,
| 20 |
| will be required by the Chicago Park District to be produced by | 21 |
| the
design-build entities.
| 22 |
| (c) The scope and performance criteria shall be prepared by | 23 |
| a design
professional or a landscape architect design | 24 |
| professional, as appropriate, who is an employee of the Chicago | 25 |
| Park District, or the Chicago Park District may
contract with |
|
|
|
HB3986 Enrolled |
- 8 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
| 1 |
| an independent design professional selected under the
Local | 2 |
| Government Professional Services Selection Act (50 ILCS 510/) | 3 |
| to provide these services.
| 4 |
| (d) The design professional or landscape architect design | 5 |
| professional that prepares the scope and performance criteria
| 6 |
| is prohibited from participating in any design-build entity | 7 |
| proposal for the
project.
| 8 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-8 new) | 9 |
| Sec. 26.10-8. Procedures for design-build selection. | 10 |
| (a) The Chicago Park District must use a two-phase | 11 |
| procedure for the
selection of the
successful design-build | 12 |
| entity. Phase I of the procedure will evaluate and
shortlist | 13 |
| the design-build entities based on qualifications, and Phase II
| 14 |
| will
evaluate the technical and cost proposals. | 15 |
| (b) The Chicago Park District shall include in the request | 16 |
| for proposal
the
evaluating factors to be used in Phase I. | 17 |
| These factors are in addition to any
prequalification | 18 |
| requirements of design-build entities that the Chicago Park | 19 |
| District has set
forth. Each request for proposal shall | 20 |
| establish the relative importance
assigned to each evaluation | 21 |
| factor and subfactor, including any weighting of
criteria to be | 22 |
| employed by the Chicago Park District. The Chicago Park | 23 |
| District must maintain a
record of the evaluation scoring to be | 24 |
| disclosed in event of a protest
regarding the solicitation.
| 25 |
| The Chicago Park District shall include the following |
|
|
|
HB3986 Enrolled |
- 9 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
| 1 |
| criteria in every
Phase I
evaluation of design-build entities: | 2 |
| (1) experience of personnel; (2)
successful
experience with | 3 |
| similar project types; (3) financial capability; (4) | 4 |
| timeliness
of past performance; (5) experience with similarly | 5 |
| sized projects; (6)
successful reference checks of the firm; | 6 |
| (7) commitment to assign personnel
for the duration of the | 7 |
| project and qualifications of the entity's consultants; and (8) | 8 |
| ability or past performance in meeting or exhausting good faith | 9 |
| efforts to meet the utilization goals for minority and women | 10 |
| business enterprises established by the corporate authorities | 11 |
| of the Chicago Park District and in complying with Section | 12 |
| 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. The Chicago Park | 13 |
| District may include any additional relevant criteria in Phase | 14 |
| I that it deems necessary for a proper qualification review.
| 15 |
| The Chicago Park District may include any additional relevant | 16 |
| criteria in
Phase I that
it deems necessary for a proper | 17 |
| qualification review.
| 18 |
| The Chicago Park District may not consider any design-build | 19 |
| entity for
evaluation or
award if the entity has any pecuniary | 20 |
| interest in the project or has other
relationships or | 21 |
| circumstances, including but not limited to, long-term
| 22 |
| leasehold, mutual performance, or development contracts with | 23 |
| the Chicago Park District,
that may give the design-build | 24 |
| entity a financial or tangible advantage over
other | 25 |
| design-build entities in the preparation, evaluation, or | 26 |
| performance of
the
design-build contract or that create the |
|
|
|
HB3986 Enrolled |
- 10 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
| 1 |
| appearance of impropriety. No design-build proposal shall be | 2 |
| considered that does not include an entity's plan to comply | 3 |
| with the requirements established in the minority and women | 4 |
| business enterprises and economically disadvantaged firms | 5 |
| established by the corporate authorities of the Chicago Park | 6 |
| District and with Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights | 7 |
| Act.
| 8 |
| Upon completion of the qualifications evaluation, the | 9 |
| Chicago Park District shall
create a shortlist of the most | 10 |
| highly qualified design-build entities. The
Chicago Park | 11 |
| District, in its discretion, is not required to shortlist the
| 12 |
| maximum number of
entities as identified for Phase II | 13 |
| evaluation, provided however, no less than
2
design-build | 14 |
| entities nor more than 6 are selected to submit Phase II
| 15 |
| proposals.
| 16 |
| The Chicago Park District shall notify the entities | 17 |
| selected for the
shortlist in
writing. This notification shall | 18 |
| commence the period for the preparation of the
Phase II | 19 |
| technical and cost evaluations. The Chicago Park District must
| 20 |
| allow sufficient
time for the shortlist entities to prepare | 21 |
| their Phase II submittals
considering
the scope and detail | 22 |
| requested by the Chicago Park District.
| 23 |
| (c) The Chicago Park District shall include in the request | 24 |
| for proposal
the
evaluating factors to be used in the technical | 25 |
| and cost submission components
of Phase II. Each request for | 26 |
| proposal shall establish, for both the technical
and cost |
|
|
|
HB3986 Enrolled |
- 11 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
| 1 |
| submission components of Phase II, the relative importance | 2 |
| assigned to
each evaluation factor and subfactor, including any | 3 |
| weighting of criteria to be
employed by the Chicago Park | 4 |
| District. The Chicago Park District must
maintain a record of | 5 |
| the
evaluation scoring to be disclosed in event of a protest | 6 |
| regarding the
solicitation.
| 7 |
| The Chicago Park District shall include the following | 8 |
| criteria in every
Phase II
technical evaluation of design-build | 9 |
| entities: (1) compliance with objectives
of
the
project; (2) | 10 |
| compliance of proposed services to the request for proposal
| 11 |
| requirements; (3) quality of products or materials proposed; | 12 |
| (4) quality of
design parameters; (5) design concepts; (6) | 13 |
| innovation in meeting the scope and
performance criteria; and | 14 |
| (7) constructability of the
proposed project. The Chicago Park | 15 |
| District may include any additional
relevant
technical | 16 |
| evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper selection.
| 17 |
| The Chicago Park District shall include the following | 18 |
| criteria in every
Phase II cost
evaluation: the guaranteed | 19 |
| maximum project cost and the time of
completion. The Chicago | 20 |
| Park District may include any additional relevant
technical
| 21 |
| evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper selection. The | 22 |
| guaranteed maximum project cost criteria weighing factor shall | 23 |
| not exceed 30%.
| 24 |
| The Chicago Park District shall directly employ or retain a | 25 |
| licensed
design
professional or landscape architect design | 26 |
| professional, as appropriate, to evaluate the technical and |
|
|
|
HB3986 Enrolled |
- 12 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
| 1 |
| cost submissions to determine if the
technical submissions are | 2 |
| in accordance with generally
accepted industry standards.
| 3 |
| Upon completion of the technical submissions and cost | 4 |
| submissions evaluation,
the Chicago Park District may award the | 5 |
| design-build contract to the
highest
overall ranked entity.
| 6 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-9 new) | 7 |
| Sec. 26.10-9. Small design-build projects. In any case | 8 |
| where the total overall cost of the
project is estimated to be | 9 |
| less than $12,000,000, the Chicago Park District
may combine
| 10 |
| the two-phase procedure for design-build selection described | 11 |
| in Section 26.10-8 into one combined
step, provided that all | 12 |
| the requirements of evaluation are performed in
accordance with | 13 |
| Section 26.10-8. | 14 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-10 new) | 15 |
| Sec. 26.10-10. Submission of design-build proposals. | 16 |
| Design-build proposals must be properly identified
and sealed. | 17 |
| Proposals may not be reviewed until after the deadline for
| 18 |
| submission has passed as set forth in the request for | 19 |
| proposals. All
design-build entities submitting proposals | 20 |
| shall be disclosed after the
deadline
for submission, and all | 21 |
| design-build entities who are selected for Phase II
evaluation | 22 |
| shall also be disclosed at the time of that determination. | 23 |
| Phase II design-build proposals shall include a bid bond in | 24 |
| the form and security as designated in
the request for |
|
|
|
HB3986 Enrolled |
- 13 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
| 1 |
| proposals. Proposals shall also contain a separate sealed
| 2 |
| envelope with the cost information within the overall proposal | 3 |
| submission.
Proposals shall include a list of all design | 4 |
| professionals, landscape architect design professionals, and | 5 |
| other entities
to which any work may be subcontracted during | 6 |
| the performance of the contract.
| 7 |
| Proposals must meet all material requirements of the | 8 |
| request for proposal or
they may be rejected as non-responsive. | 9 |
| The Chicago Park District shall
have the right
to reject any | 10 |
| and all proposals.
| 11 |
| The drawings and specifications of any unsuccessful | 12 |
| design-build proposal shall remain the property of
the | 13 |
| design-build entity.
| 14 |
| The Chicago Park District shall review the proposals for | 15 |
| compliance with
the
performance criteria and evaluation | 16 |
| factors.
| 17 |
| Proposals may be withdrawn prior to the due date and time | 18 |
| for submissions for any cause. After
evaluation begins by the | 19 |
| Chicago Park District, clear and convincing
evidence of error
| 20 |
| is required for withdrawal.
| 21 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-11 new) | 22 |
| Sec. 26.10-11. Design-build award. The Chicago Park | 23 |
| District may award a design-build contract to
the highest
| 24 |
| overall ranked entity. Notice of award shall be made in | 25 |
| writing. Unsuccessful
entities shall also be notified in |
|
|
|
HB3986 Enrolled |
- 14 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
| 1 |
| writing. The Chicago Park District may
not request a
best and | 2 |
| final offer after the receipt of proposals. The Chicago Park | 3 |
| District may
negotiate with the selected design-build entity | 4 |
| after award but prior to
contract
execution for the purpose of | 5 |
| securing better terms than originally proposed,
provided that | 6 |
| the salient features of the request for proposal are not
| 7 |
| diminished.
| 8 |
| Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon | 9 |
| becoming law.
|
|