Illinois General Assembly - Full Text of HB3420
Illinois General Assembly

  Bills & Resolutions  
  Compiled Statutes  
  Public Acts  
  Legislative Reports  
  IL Constitution  
  Legislative Guide  
  Legislative Glossary  

 Search By Number
 (example: HB0001)
Search Tips

Search By Keyword

Full Text of HB3420  103rd General Assembly

HB3420 103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY

  
  

 


 
103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2023 and 2024
HB3420

 

Introduced 2/17/2023, by Rep. Justin Slaughter

 

SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
 
725 ILCS 5/115-7.5 new

    Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides that evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic expression, whether original or derivative, may not be received into evidence against that defendant in a criminal proceeding unless the evidence is determined by the court to be relevant and admissible, after an offer of proof by the proponent of the evidence outside the hearing of the jury, or the hearing as the court may require, and an on-the-record statement by the court of the findings of fact essential to its determination. Provides that in order to overcome the presumption of inadmissibility of evidence of defendant's creative or artistic expression, the proffering party must affirmatively prove by clear and convincing evidence: (1) literal, rather than figurative or fictional, meaning and, where the work is derivative, that the defendant intended to adopt the literal meaning of the work as the defendant's own thought or statement; (2) a strong factual nexus indicating that the creative or artistic expression refers to the specific facts of the crime alleged; (3) relevance to an issue of fact that is disputed; and (4) distinct probative value not provided by other admissible evidence. Provides that if the court admits creative or artistic expression as criminal evidence, the court has a duty to apply careful redactions, provide limiting instructions, and consider the least prejudicial means of presenting the creative or artistic expression to the fact finder.


LRB103 30115 RLC 56539 b

 

 

A BILL FOR

 

HB3420LRB103 30115 RLC 56539 b

1    AN ACT concerning criminal law.
 
2    Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3represented in the General Assembly:
 
4    Section 5. The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is
5amended by adding Section 115-7.5 as follows:
 
6    (725 ILCS 5/115-7.5 new)
7    Sec. 115-7.5. Admissibility of evidence of defendant's
8creative or artistic expression.
9    (a) In this Section, "creative or artistic expression"
10means the expression or application of creativity or
11imagination in the production or arrangement of forms, sounds,
12words, movements, or symbols, including, but not limited to,
13music, dance, performance art, visual art, poetry, literature,
14film, and other such objects or media.
15    (b) Evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic
16expression, whether original or derivative, may not be
17received into evidence against that defendant in a criminal
18proceeding unless the evidence is determined by the court to
19be relevant and admissible, after an offer of proof by the
20proponent of the evidence outside the hearing of the jury, or
21the hearing as the court may require, and an on-the-record
22statement by the court of the findings of fact essential to its
23determination.

 

 

HB3420- 2 -LRB103 30115 RLC 56539 b

1    (c) In order to overcome the presumption of
2inadmissibility of evidence of defendant's creative or
3artistic expression, the proffering party must affirmatively
4prove by clear and convincing evidence:
5        (1) literal, rather than figurative or fictional,
6    meaning and, where the work is derivative, that the
7    defendant intended to adopt the literal meaning of the
8    work as the defendant's own thought or statement;
9        (2) a strong factual nexus indicating that the
10    creative or artistic expression refers to the specific
11    facts of the crime alleged;
12        (3) relevance to an issue of fact that is disputed;
13    and
14        (4) distinct probative value not provided by other
15    admissible evidence.
16    (d) If the court admits creative or artistic expression as
17criminal evidence, the court has a duty to apply careful
18redactions, provide limiting instructions, and consider the
19least prejudicial means of presenting the creative or artistic
20expression to the fact finder.