96TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2009 and 2010
HB3719

 

Introduced 2/25/2009, by Rep. Renée Kosel

 

SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
 
735 ILCS 5/Art. VIII Pt. 28 heading new
735 ILCS 5/8-2801 new
735 ILCS 5/8-2802 new
735 ILCS 5/8-2803 new
735 ILCS 5/8-2804 new
735 ILCS 5/8-2805 new
735 ILCS 5/8-2806 new
735 ILCS 5/8-2807 new
735 ILCS 5/8-2808 new
735 ILCS 5/8-2809 new
735 ILCS 5/8-2810 new

    Amends the Code of Civil Procedure. Provides that a non-expert's opinion or inference testimony is limited to opinions or inferences that are rationally based on his or her perception, helpful to a clear understanding of his or her testimony or the determination of a fact in issue, and not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge. Sets forth requirements regarding: qualifications, testimony, disclosure, and compensation of expert witnesses; bases of expert opinion testimony; limitations on expert testimony; pre-trial hearings and disclosures concerning expert witnesses; precedents to be followed in interpreting the new provisions; interlocutory appeals of rulings on the admissibility of expert evidence; standards to be followed by reviewing courts in determining the admissibility of expert testimony; severability; and other matters. Applies to actions commenced on or after the effective date of the amendatory Act and pending actions in which a trial has not been scheduled or in which a trial has been scheduled more than 90 days after the effective date of the amendatory Act. Effective immediately.


LRB096 09860 AJO 20023 b

 

 

A BILL FOR

 

HB3719 LRB096 09860 AJO 20023 b

1     AN ACT concerning civil law.
 
2     Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3 represented in the General Assembly:
 
4     Section 5. The Code of Civil Procedure is amended by adding
5 Part 28 to Article VIII as follows:
 
6     (735 ILCS 5/Art. VIII Pt. 28 heading new)
7
Part 28. Reliability in Expert Testimony Standards

 
8     (735 ILCS 5/8-2801 new)
9     Sec. 8-2801. Opinion testimony by lay witnesses. If the
10 witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness' testimony
11 in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those
12 opinions or inferences which are (a) rationally based on the
13 perception of the witness, (b) helpful to a clear understanding
14 of the witness' testimony or the determination of a fact in
15 issue, and (c) not based on scientific, technical, or other
16 specialized knowledge within the scope of Section 8-2803.
 
17     (735 ILCS 5/8-2802 new)
18     Sec. 8-2802. Testimony by experts. If scientific,
19 technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier
20 of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in
21 issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill,

 

 

HB3719 - 2 - LRB096 09860 AJO 20023 b

1 experience, training, or education may testify thereto in the
2 form of an opinion or otherwise, if (a) the testimony is based
3 upon sufficient facts or data, (b) the testimony is the product
4 of reliable principles and methods, and (c) the witness has
5 applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the
6 case.
 
7     (735 ILCS 5/8-2803 new)
8     Sec. 8-2803. Bases of expert opinion testimony. The facts
9 or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an
10 opinion or inference may be those perceived by or made known to
11 the expert at or before the hearing. If of a type reasonably
12 relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming
13 opinions or inferences upon the subject, the facts or data need
14 not be admissible in evidence in order for the opinion or
15 inference to be admitted. Facts or data that are otherwise
16 inadmissible shall not be disclosed to the jury by the
17 proponent of the opinion or inference unless the court
18 determines that their probative value in assisting the jury to
19 evaluate the expert's opinion substantially outweighs their
20 prejudicial effect.
 
21     (735 ILCS 5/8-2804 new)
22     Sec. 8-2804. Bars to expert testimony.
23     (a) A witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill,
24 experience, training, or education may only offer expert

 

 

HB3719 - 3 - LRB096 09860 AJO 20023 b

1 testimony with respect to a particular field in which the
2 expert is qualified.
3     (b) An expert witness may receive a reasonable and
4 customary fee for the rendering of professional services,
5 provided that the testimony of an expert witness shall not be
6 admitted if any such compensation is contingent on the outcome
7 of any claim or case with respect to which the testimony is
8 being offered.
 
9     (735 ILCS 5/8-2805 new)
10     Sec. 8-2805. Mandatory pre-trial hearing. If the witness is
11 testifying as an expert, then upon motion of a party, the court
12 shall hold a pre-trial hearing to determine whether the witness
13 qualifies as an expert and whether the expert's testimony
14 satisfies the requirements of Sections 8-2802, 8-2803, and
15 8-2804. The court shall allow sufficient time for a hearing and
16 shall rule on the qualifications of the witness to testify as
17 an expert and whether or not the testimony satisfies the
18 requirements of Sections 8-2802, 8-2803, and 8-2804. Such
19 hearing and ruling shall be completed no later than the final
20 pre-trial hearing. The trial court's ruling shall set forth the
21 findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which the order to
22 admit or exclude expert evidence is based.
 
23     (735 ILCS 5/8-2806 new)
24     Sec. 8-2806. Mandatory pre-trial disclosure of expert

 

 

HB3719 - 4 - LRB096 09860 AJO 20023 b

1 testimony.
2     (a) Whether or not any party elects to request a pre-trial
3 hearing contemplated in Section 8-2805, all parties shall
4 disclose to other parties the identity of any person who may be
5 used at trial to present expert evidence.
6     (b) Except as otherwise stipulated or directed by the
7 court, this disclosure shall, with respect to a witness who is
8 retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony in
9 the case or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly
10 involve giving expert testimony, be accompanied by a written
11 report prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall
12 contain a complete statement of all opinions to be expressed
13 and the basis and reasons therefor; the data or other
14 information considered by the witness in forming the opinions;
15 any exhibits to be used as a summary of or support for the
16 opinions; the qualifications of the witness, including a list
17 of all publications authored by the witness within the
18 preceding 10 years; the compensation to be paid for the study
19 and testimony; and a listing of any other cases in which the
20 witness has testified as an expert at trial or by deposition
21 within the preceding 4 years.
22     (c) These disclosures shall be made at the times and in the
23 sequence directed by the court. In the absence of other
24 directions from the court or stipulation by the parties, the
25 disclosures shall be made at least 90 days before the trial
26 date or the date the case is to be ready for trial or, if the

 

 

HB3719 - 5 - LRB096 09860 AJO 20023 b

1 evidence is intended solely to contradict or rebut evidence on
2 the same subject matter identified by another party under
3 paragraph (b), within 30 days after the disclosure made by the
4 other party.
5     (d) A party may depose any person who has been identified
6 as an expert whose opinions may be presented at trial. If a
7 report from the expert is required under paragraph (b), the
8 deposition shall not be conducted until after the report is
9 provided.
 
10     (735 ILCS 5/8-2807 new)
11     Sec. 8-2807. Interpretation. In interpreting and applying
12 this Act, the courts of this State shall follow the opinions of
13 the Supreme Court of the United States in Daubert v. Merrell
14 Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), General
15 Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997), Kumho Tire Co.
16 Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), Weisgram v. Marley,
17 528 U.S. 440 (2000), and their progeny; moreover, the courts of
18 this State may draw from other precedents binding in the
19 federal courts of this State applying the standards announced
20 by the Supreme Court of the United States in the foregoing
21 cases.
 
22     (735 ILCS 5/8-2808 new)
23     Sec. 8-2808. Interlocutory appeal. Interlocutory appeal of
24 a ruling on the admissibility of expert evidence shall be

 

 

HB3719 - 6 - LRB096 09860 AJO 20023 b

1 available at the discretion of the appellate court. In deciding
2 whether to grant the interlocutory appeal, the court shall
3 consider whether: (i) the ruling involved any challenge to the
4 constitutionality of this Act; (ii) the ruling will help prove
5 or disprove criminal liability; or (iii) the ruling will help
6 establish civil liability at or above $75,000, where the
7 testimony could be outcome-determinative for establishing
8 liability or determining damages. Neither a party's failure to
9 seek interlocutory appeal nor an appellate court's decision to
10 deny a motion for interlocutory appeal shall waive a party's
11 right to appeal a ruling on the admissibility of expert
12 evidence after an entry of judgment in the case.
 
13     (735 ILCS 5/8-2809 new)
14     Sec. 8-2809. Standard of review.
15     (a) As the proper construction of the expert evidence
16 admissibility framework prescribed by this Act is a question of
17 law, the reviewing court shall apply a de novo standard of
18 review in determining whether the trial court fully applied the
19 proper legal standard in considering the admissibility of
20 expert evidence.
21     (b) As the application of this Act to determine the
22 admissibility of expert testimony is a question of fact, the
23 reviewing court shall apply an abuse of discretion standard in
24 determining whether the trial court properly admitted or
25 excluded particular expert evidence.
 

 

 

HB3719 - 7 - LRB096 09860 AJO 20023 b

1     (735 ILCS 5/8-2810 new)
2     Sec. 8-2810. Application. This Part applies to all actions
3 commenced on or after the effective date of this amendatory Act
4 of the 96th General Assembly and to all pending actions in
5 which trial has not been scheduled or in which trial has been
6 scheduled in excess of 90 days after the effective date of this
7 amendatory Act of the 96th General Assembly.
 
8     Section 97. Severability. The provisions of this Act are
9 severable under Section 1.31 of the Statute on Statutes.
 
10     Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon
11 becoming law.