|
| | HB4902 Enrolled | | LRB103 38886 RJT 69023 b |
|
|
1 | | AN ACT concerning education. |
2 | | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, |
3 | | represented in the General Assembly: |
4 | | Section 5. The School Code is amended by changing Section |
5 | | 2-3.25f as follows: |
6 | | (105 ILCS 5/2-3.25f) (from Ch. 122, par. 2-3.25f) |
7 | | Sec. 2-3.25f. State interventions. |
8 | | (a) The State Board of Education shall provide technical |
9 | | assistance to schools in school improvement status to assist |
10 | | with the development and implementation of Improvement Plans. |
11 | | Schools or school districts that fail to make reasonable |
12 | | efforts to implement an approved Improvement Plan may suffer |
13 | | loss of State funds by school district, attendance center, or |
14 | | program as the State Board of Education deems appropriate. |
15 | | (a-5) (Blank). |
16 | | (b) Schools that receive Targeted Support or Comprehensive |
17 | | Support designations shall enter a 4-year cycle of school |
18 | | improvement status. If, at the end of the 4-year cycle, the |
19 | | school fails to meet the exit criteria specified in the State |
20 | | Plan referenced in subsection (b) of Section 2-3.25a of this |
21 | | Code, the school shall escalate to a more intensive |
22 | | intervention. Targeted Support schools that remain Targeted |
23 | | for one or more of the same student groups as in the initial |
|
| | HB4902 Enrolled | - 2 - | LRB103 38886 RJT 69023 b |
|
|
1 | | identification after completion of a 4-year cycle of Targeted |
2 | | School Improvement shall be redesignated as Comprehensive |
3 | | Support schools, as provided in paragraph (2.5) of subsection |
4 | | (a) of Section 2-3.25d-5 of this Code. Comprehensive Support |
5 | | schools that remain in the lowest-performing 5% after |
6 | | completion of a 4-year cycle of Comprehensive School |
7 | | Improvement shall be redesignated as Intensive Support schools |
8 | | and shall escalate through more rigorous, tiered support, |
9 | | developed in consultation with the Balanced Accountability |
10 | | Measure Committee and other relevant stakeholder groups, which |
11 | | may ultimately result in the (i) change of recognition status |
12 | | of the school district or school to nonrecognized or (ii) |
13 | | authorization for the State Superintendent of Education to |
14 | | direct the reassignment of pupils or direct the reassignment |
15 | | or replacement of school or school district personnel. If a |
16 | | school district is nonrecognized in its entirety, for any |
17 | | reason, including those not related to performance in the |
18 | | accountability system, it shall automatically be dissolved on |
19 | | July 1 following that nonrecognition and its territory |
20 | | realigned with another school district or districts by the |
21 | | regional board of school trustees in accordance with the |
22 | | procedures set forth in Section 7-11 of the School Code. The |
23 | | effective date of the nonrecognition of a school shall be July |
24 | | 1 following the nonrecognition. |
25 | | (b-5) The State Board of Education shall also develop a |
26 | | system to provide assistance and resources to lower performing |
|
| | HB4902 Enrolled | - 3 - | LRB103 38886 RJT 69023 b |
|
|
1 | | school districts. At a minimum, the State Board shall identify |
2 | | school districts to receive Intensive, Comprehensive, and |
3 | | Targeted Support. The school district shall provide the |
4 | | exclusive bargaining representative with a 5-day notice that |
5 | | the district has had one or more schools within the district |
6 | | identified as being in Comprehensive or Intensive School |
7 | | Improvement Status. In addition, the State Board may, by rule, |
8 | | develop other categories of low-performing schools and school |
9 | | districts to receive services. |
10 | | The State Board of Education shall work with districts |
11 | | with one or more schools in Comprehensive or Intensive School |
12 | | Improvement Status, through technical assistance and |
13 | | professional development, based on the results of the needs |
14 | | assessment under Section 2-3.25d-5 of this Code, to develop |
15 | | and implement a continuous improvement plan that would |
16 | | increase outcomes for students. The plan for continuous |
17 | | improvement shall be based on the results of the needs |
18 | | assessment and shall be used to determine the types of |
19 | | services that are to be provided to each Comprehensive and |
20 | | Intensive School. Potential services may include, but are not |
21 | | limited to, monitoring adult and student practices, reviewing |
22 | | and reallocating district resources, developing a district and |
23 | | school leadership team, providing access to curricular content |
24 | | area specialists, and providing online resources and |
25 | | professional development. |
26 | | The support provided by a vendor or learning partner |
|
| | HB4902 Enrolled | - 4 - | LRB103 38886 RJT 69023 b |
|
|
1 | | approved to support a school's continuous improvement plan |
2 | | related to English language arts must be based on the |
3 | | comprehensive literacy plan for the State developed by the |
4 | | State Board of Education under Section 2-3.196, as added by |
5 | | Public Act 103-402. |
6 | | The State Board of Education may require districts with |
7 | | one or more Comprehensive or Intensive Schools identified as |
8 | | having deficiencies in one or more core functions of the needs |
9 | | assessment to undergo an accreditation process. |
10 | | (c) All federal requirements apply to schools and school |
11 | | districts utilizing federal funds under Title I, Part A of the |
12 | | federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. |
13 | | (Source: P.A. 103-175, eff. 6-30-23.) |