Sen. Antonio Muņoz

Filed: 3/5/2015

 

 


 

 


 
09900SB0863sam001LRB099 03922 HEP 31712 a

1
AMENDMENT TO SENATE BILL 863

2    AMENDMENT NO. ______. Amend Senate Bill 863 by replacing
3everything after the enacting clause with the following:
 
4    "Section 5. The Code of Civil Procedure is amended by
5changing Section 2-301 as follows:
 
6    (735 ILCS 5/2-301)  (from Ch. 110, par. 2-301)
7    Sec. 2-301. Objections to jurisdiction over the person.
8    (a) Prior to the filing of any other pleading or motion
9other than a motion for an extension of time to answer or
10otherwise appear, a party may object to the court's
11jurisdiction over the party's person, either on the ground that
12the party is not amenable to process of a court of this State
13or on the ground of insufficiency of process or insufficiency
14of service of process, by filing a motion to dismiss the entire
15proceeding or any cause of action involved in the proceeding or
16by filing a motion to quash service of process. Such a motion

 

 

09900SB0863sam001- 2 -LRB099 03922 HEP 31712 a

1may be made singly or included with others in a combined
2motion, but the parts of a combined motion must be identified
3in the manner described in Section 2-619.1. Unless the facts
4that constitute the basis for the objection are apparent from
5papers already on file in the case, the motion must be
6supported by an affidavit setting forth those facts.
7    (a-5) The deadline for filing a motion to dismiss the
8entire proceeding or to quash service of process on the basis
9of an objection to the court's jurisdiction over the person,
10unless extended by the court for good cause shown, is 60 days
11after the earlier of: (i) the date that the moving party filed
12an appearance; or (ii) the date that the moving party
13participated in a hearing without filing an appearance. If the
14objecting party files a responsive pleading or a motion (other
15than a motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise
16appear) prior to the filing of a motion in compliance with
17subsection (a), that party waives all objections to the court's
18jurisdiction over the party's person.
19    (b) In disposing of a motion objecting to the court's
20jurisdiction over the person of the objecting party, the court
21shall consider all matters apparent from the papers on file in
22the case, affidavits submitted by any party, and any evidence
23adduced upon contested issues of fact. The court shall enter an
24appropriate order sustaining or overruling the objection. No
25determination of any issue of fact in connection with the
26objection is a determination of the merits of the case or any

 

 

09900SB0863sam001- 3 -LRB099 03922 HEP 31712 a

1aspect thereof. A decision adverse to the objector does not
2preclude the objector from making any motion or defense which
3he or she might otherwise have made.
4    (c) Error in ruling against the objecting party on the
5objection is waived by the party's taking part in further
6proceedings unless the objection is on the ground that the
7party is not amenable to process issued by a court of this
8State.
9(Source: P.A. 91-145, eff. 1-1-00.)".