| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | AN ACT concerning local government.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | represented in the General Assembly:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Section 5. The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Act | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | is amended by adding Sections 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 77 as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | (70 ILCS 2605/70 new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Sec. 70. Definitions. For the purposes of Sections 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | through 77, the following terms shall have the following | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | meanings, unless the context requires a different meaning: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | "Delivery system" means the design and construction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | approach used to develop and construct a project. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | "Design-bid-build" means the traditional delivery system | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | used on public projects that incorporates the Local Government | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | Professional Services Selection Act and the principles of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | competitive selection. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | "Design-build" means a delivery system that provides | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | responsibility within a single contract for the furnishing of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | architecture, engineering, land surveying, and related | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | services as required, and the labor, materials, equipment, and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | other construction services for the project. Furthermore, it | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | means a version of design-build, sometimes referred to as | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | "Bridged Design-Build", in which substantial design work is |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | completed before a Guaranteed Maximum Price is established to | ||||||
2 | complete the design and perform the construction. | ||||||
3 | "Design-build contract" means a contract for a public | ||||||
4 | project under this Act between the Metropolitan Water | ||||||
5 | Reclamation District and a design-build entity to furnish | ||||||
6 | architecture, engineering, land surveying, landscape | ||||||
7 | architecture, and related services as required, and to furnish | ||||||
8 | the labor, materials, equipment, and other construction | ||||||
9 | services for the project. The design-build contract may be | ||||||
10 | conditioned upon subsequent refinements in scope and price and | ||||||
11 | may allow the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District to make | ||||||
12 | modifications in the project scope without invalidating the | ||||||
13 | design-build contract. | ||||||
14 | "Design-build entity" means any type of organization | ||||||
15 | recognized to do business under the laws of the State of | ||||||
16 | Illinois that is registered in good standing with the Secretary | ||||||
17 | of State or a joint venture whose members are all entity's | ||||||
18 | registered in good standing to do business in the State of | ||||||
19 | Illinois. The organization must: | ||||||
20 | (i) be registered, or have a member firm of the joint | ||||||
21 | venture registered, under the Illinois Administrative | ||||||
22 | Code, as referenced by the licensed design professionals | ||||||
23 | Acts of this State, to perform design services for the | ||||||
24 | design-build project; and | ||||||
25 | (ii) be capable of project management, direct | ||||||
26 | supervision of construction operations, and |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | self-performance of a major portion of the construction | ||||||
2 | work. | ||||||
3 | "Design professional" means any individual, sole | ||||||
4 | proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | ||||||
5 | professional corporation, or other entity that offers services | ||||||
6 | under the Illinois Architecture Practice Act of 1989, the | ||||||
7 | Professional Engineering Practice Act of 1989, the Structural | ||||||
8 | Engineering Practice Act of 1989, or the Illinois Professional | ||||||
9 | Land Surveyor Act of 1989. | ||||||
10 | "Evaluation criteria" means the requirements for the | ||||||
11 | separate phases of the selection process for design-build | ||||||
12 | proposals as defined in this Act and may include the | ||||||
13 | specialized experience, technical qualifications and | ||||||
14 | competence, capacity to perform, past performance, experience | ||||||
15 | with similar projects, assignment of personnel to the project, | ||||||
16 | and other appropriate factors. The GMP may not be used as the | ||||||
17 | sole factor in the evaluation of proposals. | ||||||
18 | "Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP)" means a form of contract | ||||||
19 | in which compensation may vary according to the scope of work | ||||||
20 | involved but in any case may not exceed an agreed total amount | ||||||
21 | to both complete technical design for and to actually construct | ||||||
22 | a project. | ||||||
23 | "Landscape architect design professional" means any | ||||||
24 | person, sole proprietorship, or entity including, but not | ||||||
25 | limited to, a partnership, professional service corporation, | ||||||
26 | or corporation that offers services under the Illinois |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | Landscape Architecture Act of 1989. | ||||||
2 | "Proposal" means the offer to enter into a design-build | ||||||
3 | contract as submitted by a design-build entity in accordance | ||||||
4 | with this Act. | ||||||
5 | "Request for Proposal (RFP)" means the document used by the | ||||||
6 | Metropolitan Water Reclamation District to solicit proposals | ||||||
7 | for a design-build contract. | ||||||
8 | "Scope and performance criteria" means the requirements | ||||||
9 | for the public project, including, but not limited to: | ||||||
10 | Metropolitan Water Reclamation District standard design | ||||||
11 | specifications, drawings, and criteria; the intended usage, | ||||||
12 | capacity, size, scope, quality, and performance standards; | ||||||
13 | life cycle costs and other programmatic criteria; and | ||||||
14 | quantifiable specifications and drawings developed to the | ||||||
15 | point that a design-build entity will develop a proposal to | ||||||
16 | complete the design, produce final construction documents, and | ||||||
17 | construct the project for a GMP. | ||||||
18 | (70 ILCS 2605/71 new) | ||||||
19 | Sec. 71. Authorization for design-build; advertisement. | ||||||
20 | (a) The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District shall have | ||||||
21 | the power to enter into design-build contracts to complete | ||||||
22 | design and construction of public works. In addition to the | ||||||
23 | requirements set forth in the Purchasing Act for the | ||||||
24 | Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago, the | ||||||
25 | Metropolitan Water Reclamation District shall advertise a |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | design-build solicitation at least once in a daily newspaper of | ||||||
2 | general circulation within Cook County and on its own official | ||||||
3 | Internet website or in an electronic plan room for public | ||||||
4 | projects. | ||||||
5 | (b) The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District may reject | ||||||
6 | any and all bids and proposals received and may readvertise for | ||||||
7 | bids or issue a new request for design-build proposals. | ||||||
8 | (70 ILCS 2605/72 new) | ||||||
9 | Sec. 72. Solicitation of design-build proposals. | ||||||
10 | (a) When the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District | ||||||
11 | elects to use the design-build delivery method, it must issue a | ||||||
12 | notice of intent to receive proposals for the project at least | ||||||
13 | 14 days before issuing the request for the proposal. The | ||||||
14 | Metropolitan Water Reclamation District shall publish notice | ||||||
15 | of the request for the design-build proposal in a newspaper of | ||||||
16 | general circulation within Cook County. The Metropolitan Water | ||||||
17 | Reclamation District shall, if possible, post plans and | ||||||
18 | specifications in a related construction industry service. A | ||||||
19 | brief description of the proposed procurement must be included | ||||||
20 | in the notice. | ||||||
21 | (b) The request for proposal shall be prepared for each | ||||||
22 | project and must contain, without limitation, the following | ||||||
23 | information: | ||||||
24 | (1) A preliminary schedule for the completion of the
| ||||||
25 | contract. |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | (2) The proposed budget for the project, the source
of | ||||||
2 | funds, and the funds available at the time the request for | ||||||
3 | proposal is submitted. | ||||||
4 | (3) The developed design plans and specifications to be | ||||||
5 | completed under the GMP. | ||||||
6 | (4) Prequalification criteria for design-build
| ||||||
7 | entities wishing to submit proposals. The Metropolitan | ||||||
8 | Water Reclamation District shall include, at a minimum, its | ||||||
9 | normal prequalification, licensing, registration, and | ||||||
10 | other requirements, but nothing contained in this Section | ||||||
11 | precludes the use of additional prequalification criteria | ||||||
12 | by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District. | ||||||
13 | (5) Material requirements of the contract, including,
| ||||||
14 | but not limited to, the proposed terms and conditions, | ||||||
15 | required performance and payment bonds, and insurance. | ||||||
16 | (6) The performance criteria. | ||||||
17 | (7) The evaluation criteria for the
solicitation. | ||||||
18 | (8) The list of items intended to be considered
for the | ||||||
19 | technical and cost evaluation phase. | ||||||
20 | (c) The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District may | ||||||
21 | include any other relevant information that it chooses to | ||||||
22 | supply. The design-build entity shall be entitled to rely upon | ||||||
23 | the accuracy of this documentation in the development of its | ||||||
24 | proposal. | ||||||
25 | (d) The date that proposals are due must be at least 21 | ||||||
26 | calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | proposal. In the event the construction portion of the cost of | ||||||
2 | the project is estimated to exceed $12,000,000, then the | ||||||
3 | proposal due date must be at least 28 calendar days after the | ||||||
4 | date of the issuance of the request for proposal. The | ||||||
5 | Metropolitan Water Reclamation District shall include in the | ||||||
6 | request for proposal a minimum of 21 days to develop the Phase | ||||||
7 | II submissions for those entities shortlisted in the Phase I | ||||||
8 | evaluation. | ||||||
9 | (70 ILCS 2605/73 new) | ||||||
10 | Sec. 73. Development of design-build scope and performance | ||||||
11 | criteria when a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal is sought. | ||||||
12 | (a) The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District shall | ||||||
13 | develop the scope and performance criteria in sufficient | ||||||
14 | detail. The scope and performance criteria must contain | ||||||
15 | adequate information to reasonably apprise the qualified | ||||||
16 | design-build entities of the District's original programmatic | ||||||
17 | needs and goals, plus budget parameters, schedule, and delivery | ||||||
18 | requirements for completion of the design and construction. | ||||||
19 | (b) Each request for proposal shall also include a | ||||||
20 | developed design to be provided in the proposals. This | ||||||
21 | description must include the scope, drawings, and | ||||||
22 | specifications by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District | ||||||
23 | that form the basis of the full design to be completed by the | ||||||
24 | design-build entities. | ||||||
25 | (c) The scope and performance criteria shall be prepared by |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, directly by its | ||||||
2 | staff or by a contract with an independent design professional | ||||||
3 | selected under the Local Government Professional Services | ||||||
4 | Selection Act to provide these services. | ||||||
5 | (d) An individual or corporate design professional or | ||||||
6 | landscape architect design professional that prepares the | ||||||
7 | scope and performance criteria is prohibited from | ||||||
8 | participating in any design-build entity proposal for the | ||||||
9 | project. | ||||||
10 | (70 ILCS 2605/74 new) | ||||||
11 | Sec. 74. Procedures for design-build selection. | ||||||
12 | (a) The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District must use a | ||||||
13 | 2-phase procedure for the selection of the successful | ||||||
14 | design-build entity for projects where the budgeted | ||||||
15 | construction cost is over $12,000,000. Phase I of the procedure | ||||||
16 | will evaluate and shortlist the design-build entities based on | ||||||
17 | best qualifications to design and build the specific project, | ||||||
18 | and Phase II will evaluate the technical and cost proposals for | ||||||
19 | design and construction. Evaluation of Phases I and II will be | ||||||
20 | by a panel of 3 to 5 Metropolitan Water Reclamation District | ||||||
21 | employees who are registered design professionals. | ||||||
22 | (b) The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District shall | ||||||
23 | include in the request for proposal the evaluating factors to | ||||||
24 | be used in Phase I. These factors are in addition to any | ||||||
25 | prequalification requirements of design-build entities that |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District has set forth.
The | ||||||
2 | Metropolitan Water Reclamation District shall include the | ||||||
3 | following criteria in every Phase I evaluation of design-build | ||||||
4 | entities: | ||||||
5 | (1) experience of key design and construction | ||||||
6 | personnel; | ||||||
7 | (2) successful experience with similar project types; | ||||||
8 | (3) financial capability; | ||||||
9 | (4) timeliness of past performance; | ||||||
10 | (5) experience with similarly sized projects; | ||||||
11 | (6) work history on Metropolitan Water Reclamation | ||||||
12 | District projects; | ||||||
13 | (7) commitment to assign personnel for the duration of | ||||||
14 | the project; | ||||||
15 | (8) qualifications of the entity's consultants and | ||||||
16 | subcontractors; and | ||||||
17 | (9) ability or past performance in meeting the | ||||||
18 | utilization goals for minority and women business | ||||||
19 | enterprises established by Appendix D of the Metropolitan | ||||||
20 | Water Reclamation District Affirmative Action Ordinance | ||||||
21 | and in complying with Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human | ||||||
22 | Rights Act. | ||||||
23 | The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District may include any | ||||||
24 | additional relevant criteria in Phase I that it deems necessary | ||||||
25 | for a proper qualification review. | ||||||
26 | The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District may not |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | consider any design-build entity for evaluation or award if the | ||||||
2 | entity has any pecuniary interest in the project or has other | ||||||
3 | relationships or circumstances, including but not limited to, a | ||||||
4 | long-term leasehold, mutual performance, or development | ||||||
5 | contract with the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, | ||||||
6 | that may give the design-build entity a financial or tangible | ||||||
7 | advantage over other design-build entities in the preparation, | ||||||
8 | evaluation, or performance of the design-build contract or that | ||||||
9 | creates the appearance of impropriety. | ||||||
10 | Upon completion of the Phase I qualifications evaluation, | ||||||
11 | the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District shall create a | ||||||
12 | shortlist of the most highly qualified design-build entities. | ||||||
13 | The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, in its | ||||||
14 | discretion, is not required to shortlist the maximum number of | ||||||
15 | entities as identified for Phase II evaluation, except that no | ||||||
16 | less than 2 design-build entities nor more than 4 design-build | ||||||
17 | entities are selected to submit Phase II proposals. | ||||||
18 | (c) The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District shall | ||||||
19 | notify the entities selected for the shortlist in writing. This | ||||||
20 | notification shall commence the period for the preparation of | ||||||
21 | Phase II in 2 separate sections, technical and cost | ||||||
22 | evaluations. The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District must | ||||||
23 | allow sufficient time for the shortlist entities to prepare | ||||||
24 | their Phase II submittals considering the scope and detail | ||||||
25 | requested by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District. | ||||||
26 | The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District shall include |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | in the shortlist notification the evaluating factors to be used | ||||||
2 | in the technical and cost submission components of Phase II. | ||||||
3 | The notice shall establish, for both the technical and cost | ||||||
4 | submission components of Phase II, the relative importance | ||||||
5 | assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, including any | ||||||
6 | weighting of criteria to be employed by the evaluation panel. | ||||||
7 | The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District must maintain a | ||||||
8 | record of the evaluation scoring to be disclosed in the event | ||||||
9 | of a protest regarding the solicitation. | ||||||
10 | The Phase II technical proposal shall be sealed by the | ||||||
11 | primary individual design professional in the design-build | ||||||
12 | entity. The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District shall | ||||||
13 | include the following criteria in every Phase II technical | ||||||
14 | evaluation of design-build entities: | ||||||
15 | (1) compliance with objectives of the project; | ||||||
16 | (2) compliance of design services to fully complete the | ||||||
17 | project design; | ||||||
18 | (3) quality of products or materials proposed; | ||||||
19 | (4) quality of separate technical disciplines required | ||||||
20 | to complete the design; | ||||||
21 | (5) innovative design concepts; | ||||||
22 | (6) innovation in meeting the scope and performance | ||||||
23 | criteria; | ||||||
24 | (7) equipment spread required and manpower curve for | ||||||
25 | construction of the project; and | ||||||
26 | (8) constructability of the proposed project. |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District may include | ||||||
2 | any additional relevant technical evaluation factors it deems | ||||||
3 | necessary for proper selection.
The Metropolitan Water | ||||||
4 | Reclamation District shall include the following criteria in | ||||||
5 | every Phase II cost evaluation: | ||||||
6 | (1) guaranteed maximum project cost; | ||||||
7 | (2) quality of the design cost proposal portion of the | ||||||
8 | GMP; | ||||||
9 | (3) quality of the construction cost proposal portion | ||||||
10 | of the GMP; | ||||||
11 | (4) estimated cash flow curve for the project; | ||||||
12 | (5) unit rates for personnel and equipment for both | ||||||
13 | design and construction change orders; and | ||||||
14 | (6) time of completion. | ||||||
15 | The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District may include any | ||||||
16 | additional relevant technical evaluation factors it deems | ||||||
17 | necessary for proper selection. The Metropolitan Water | ||||||
18 | Reclamation District shall prepare an independent engineer's | ||||||
19 | estimate for use in the overall evaluation of the GMP and to | ||||||
20 | verify the reasonable value and balance in the sections of the | ||||||
21 | GMP. The weighting between the technical and cost sections used | ||||||
22 | in the evaluation of Phase II shall be the percentages of the | ||||||
23 | design costs and of the construction costs as a portion of the | ||||||
24 | total GMP, respectively. | ||||||
25 | Upon completion of the technical submissions and cost | ||||||
26 | submissions evaluation, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | District may award the design-build contract to the highest | ||||||
2 | overall ranked entity. | ||||||
3 | (70 ILCS 2605/75 new) | ||||||
4 | Sec. 75. Small design-build projects. In any case where the | ||||||
5 | total overall construction cost of the project is estimated to | ||||||
6 | be less than $12,000,000, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation | ||||||
7 | District may combine the 2-phase procedure for design-build | ||||||
8 | selection described in Section 74 into one combined step, | ||||||
9 | provided that all the requirements of evaluation are performed. | ||||||
10 | (70 ILCS 2605/76 new) | ||||||
11 | Sec. 76. Submission of design-build proposals. | ||||||
12 | Design-build proposals must be properly identified and | ||||||
13 | physically sealed when submitted to the Metropolitan Water | ||||||
14 | Reclamation District. Proposals may not be reviewed until after | ||||||
15 | the deadline for submission has passed as set forth in the | ||||||
16 | request for proposals. All design-build entities submitting | ||||||
17 | proposals shall be disclosed after the deadline for submission, | ||||||
18 | and all design-build entities who are selected for Phase II | ||||||
19 | evaluation shall also be disclosed at the time of that | ||||||
20 | determination. | ||||||
21 | Phase II design-build proposals shall include a bid bond in | ||||||
22 | the form and security as designated in the request for | ||||||
23 | proposals. | ||||||
24 | Proposals must meet all material requirements of the |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | request for proposal or they may be rejected as non-responsive. | ||||||
2 | The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District shall have the | ||||||
3 | right to reject any proposal. | ||||||
4 | The drawings and specifications of any unsuccessful | ||||||
5 | design-build proposal shall remain the property of the | ||||||
6 | design-build entity and are not subject to disclosure under the | ||||||
7 | Illinois Freedom of Information Act nor retention under the | ||||||
8 | Local Records Act as proprietary information. The Metropolitan | ||||||
9 | Water Reclamation District shall hold unsuccessful | ||||||
10 | design-build submittals for 30 days after the contract signing | ||||||
11 | or decision not to proceed with the project in order for | ||||||
12 | unsuccessful entities to retrieve the submittals. The drawings | ||||||
13 | and specifications of the successful design-build proposal | ||||||
14 | shall become the property of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation | ||||||
15 | District upon signing the design-build contract. | ||||||
16 | The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District shall review | ||||||
17 | the proposals for compliance with the performance criteria and | ||||||
18 | evaluation factors. | ||||||
19 | Proposals may be withdrawn before the due date and time for | ||||||
20 | submissions for any cause. After evaluation begins by the | ||||||
21 | Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, clear and convincing | ||||||
22 | evidence of error is required for withdrawal of a proposal. | ||||||
23 | (70 ILCS 2605/77 new) | ||||||
24 | Sec. 77. Design-build award. The Metropolitan Water | ||||||
25 | Reclamation District may notify the highest overall ranked |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | entity of the intent to award it the design-build contract. | ||||||
2 | Notice of intent to award shall be made in writing. The | ||||||
3 | Metropolitan Water Reclamation District may then negotiate | ||||||
4 | with the selected design-build entity prior to contract | ||||||
5 | execution for the purpose of clarifying or securing better | ||||||
6 | terms than originally proposed, provided that the salient | ||||||
7 | features of the request for proposal are not diminished. When | ||||||
8 | negotiations are complete, then the design-build contract can | ||||||
9 | be awarded and signed. In the event that matters of importance | ||||||
10 | in the negotiations are not resolved, the Metropolitan Water | ||||||
11 | Reclamation District may withdrawal the intent to award and | ||||||
12 | notify the next-ranked design-build entity of the intent to | ||||||
13 | award it the contract. Unsuccessful entities must be notified | ||||||
14 | in writing after the contract is signed or when a definitive | ||||||
15 | decision is made not to proceed with the design-build contract.
| ||||||
16 | Section 97. Severability. The provisions of this Act are | ||||||
17 | severable under Section 1.31 of the Statute on Statutes.
|