HR1279LRB097 21920 AJO 70626 r

1
HOUSE RESOLUTION

 
2    WHEREAS, The members of the Illinois House of
3Representatives recognize that there are distressed counties
4and communities throughout Illinois that struggle with many
5economic and social problems including crime, unemployment,
6poverty, mortgage foreclosures, declining property values,
7deficiencies in public health services, and deficits in public
8education; and
 
9    WHEREAS, In recent years these economic and social problems
10have become more prevalent and they have exacerbated existing
11conditions which include: inequalities in access to justice in
12the civil court system, an overburdened and ineffective
13criminal justice system, overcrowded correctional facilities,
14increased homelessness, inadequate educational opportunities,
15insufficient affordable housing, inadequate delivery of social
16services to the less fortunate, and deficits in the
17availability and quality of public health services; and
 
18    WHEREAS, Some segments of our society, some communities,
19and some counties disproportionately experience these serious
20social and economic ills; for example, the Illinois counties
21which had 16% or more of their population in poverty in 2010
22included: Alexander, Champaign, Coles, Cook, Franklin,
23Gallatin, Hardin, Jackson, Lawrence, McDonough, Macon, Marion,

 

 

HR1279- 2 -LRB097 21920 AJO 70626 r

1Massac, Perry, Pike, Pope, Pulaski, Saline, Union, Vermilion,
2White Williamson, and Winnebago; and the municipalities with a
3population of over 100,000 that had family poverty rates of 10%
4or more are: Aurora, Chicago, Joliet, Naperville, Peoria,
5Rockford, and Springfield; and
 
6    WHEREAS, It is important to take a comprehensive approach
7to the ongoing crisis of distressed communities in Illinois and
8a significant poverty rate is among the best indicators that a
9community is in distress; and
 
10    WHEREAS, Care must be taken when addressing poverty and its
11associated problems in counties with distressed communities
12because an emphasis on serving the largest number of people in
13poverty will miss other areas of the State with significant
14problems and an emphasis on areas with the highest rates of
15poverty will ignore large populations in need, as shown by
16these facts:
17        while Cook County has the highest number of persons
18    living in poverty (which amounts to nearly 50% of the
19    State's poverty population), DuPage County (which has
20    historically been considered to be a wealthy county with a
21    small low-income population) has the second-highest number
22    of persons in poverty;
23        the 10 poorest counties in Illinois, as measured by
24    poverty rate, are generally downstate with small total

 

 

HR1279- 3 -LRB097 21920 AJO 70626 r

1    populations and while their poverty rates are very high
2    (the highest county poverty rate is 31.1%; and an average
3    for all 10 of the poorest counties is a poverty rate of
4    21.6%), these counties collectively account for less than
5    10% of the State's total poverty population;
6        the 10 counties with the highest numbers of persons in
7    poverty are, for the most part, near urban centers (5 of
8    these counties are in the Chicago metropolitan area) and
9    these 10 counties include over 70% of the State's poverty
10    population;
11        a Statewide emphasis on the top 10 counties with high
12    poverty rates will ignore the needs of 94% of the State's
13    poverty population, but an emphasis on the 10 counties with
14    the highest numbers of people in poverty will deemphasize
15    the counties with the highest poverty rates; and
 
16    WHEREAS, The U.S. Census Bureau on September 12, 2012
17announced that, in 2011:
18        the median household income in the United States
19    declined by 1.5% from the 2010 median, which was the second
20    consecutive annual drop;
21        the weighted average poverty threshold for a family of
22    four in 2011 was $23,021;
23        the nation's official poverty rate was 15.0 percent,
24    with 46.2 million people in poverty; and
25        although the poverty rate and number of people remained

 

 

HR1279- 4 -LRB097 21920 AJO 70626 r

1    statistically unchanged since 2010, this is the fourth year
2    in a row with such significant amounts of poverty in this
3    country; and
 
4    WHEREAS, The poverty rate in Illinois increased to 14.2% in
52011 and there has been a 42% increase in the poverty rate in
6Illinois from 2007 to 2011; and
 
7    WHEREAS, Living in a high poverty rate Chicago neighborhood
8carries with it an increased threat to life itself; a recent
9comparison of 2 sets of Chicago neighborhoods, the 5 poorest
10and the 5 least poor, showed that:
11        the poorest neighborhoods had a homicide rate that is
12    11 times the homicide rate in the least poor neighborhoods;
13        the mortality rate for the leading causes of death in
14    Chicago (cancer, heart disease, diabetes-related
15    illnesses, stroke, and unintentional injury) is 5 times
16    higher in the 5 poorest neighborhoods than it is in the 5
17    least poor neighborhoods;
18        the infant mortality rate is 2.5 times higher in the 5
19    poorest neighborhoods than in the 5 least poor
20    neighborhoods; and
21        a measure called the Years of Potential Life Lost
22    (YPLL), which determines how many years of life are lost
23    due to deaths in a community (using the base age of 75
24    years), showed that the YPLL rate for homicide in the 5

 

 

HR1279- 5 -LRB097 21920 AJO 70626 r

1    poorest neighborhoods was 2,172 (that is for every 100,000
2    residents 2,172 years of life were lost each year to
3    homicide) compared to the YPLL homicide rate of only 186 in
4    the 5 least poor neighborhoods; and
 
5    WHEREAS, So long as these social and economic problems are
6not successfully addressed in distressed counties and
7communities, the cost to taxpayers in Illinois for the many
8programs funded or operated by the State will only increase;
9and
 
10    WHEREAS, State government resources are expended in
11ever-increasing amounts to address these social and economic
12problems and those expenditures are a significant drain on the
13State's road to financial stability; and
 
14    WHEREAS, There exist numerous ways for State government
15programs to be operated more efficiently and more economically;
16and
 
17    WHEREAS, State government, taxpayers, and those living in
18distressed counties and communities with significant poverty
19rates could benefit from the creation of a State action plan
20that identifies: modifications that should be made to existing
21State programs so as to dramatically improve the delivery of
22services, reduce the cost of those services, and eliminate

 

 

HR1279- 6 -LRB097 21920 AJO 70626 r

1wasteful spending; leadership programs and new educational
2opportunities that would foster and equip new leaders; and ways
3in which State government could actively create a change
4environment that will have numerous positive impacts; and
 
5    WHEREAS, If more effective, efficient, and economical ways
6to deliver social and law enforcement services can be
7developed, then significant strides can be made in the overall
8welfare of the distressed counties and communities and those
9solutions could be replicated, with adjustments as
10appropriate, to all communities in Illinois; and
 
11    RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE
12NINETY-SEVENTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that
13we urge the Governor to create a Distressed Counties and
14Communities Commission composed of stakeholders in distressed
15counties and communities, representatives of appropriate State
16agencies, and community leaders to explore, discuss, and
17coordinate efforts to prepare an action plan to offer enhanced
18State governmental services in a meaningful way, to foster
19leadership, and to create programs that can succeed in
20addressing the myriad social and economic problems that exist;
21this, in turn, can benefit all Illinois communities; and be it
22further
 
23    RESOLVED, That we urge that the Governor appoint members of

 

 

HR1279- 7 -LRB097 21920 AJO 70626 r

1the Distressed Counties and Communities Commission by early
2January 2013, so as to allow the Distressed Counties and
3Communities Commission to hold its first meeting in January
42013, and designate an executive department to provide
5administrative support for the Commission; and be it further
 
6    RESOLVED, That the Distressed Counties and Communities
7Commission be charged with: finding and creating innovative
8means to address and meet the numerous needs of those who
9receive State social services; designing plans to assist and
10enhance the efforts of State agencies and local governments
11that provide law enforcement and social services; analyzing
12successful state and local governmental programs in other
13locales in law enforcement, court administration, corrections,
14job skill retraining, education, economic opportunity, job
15creation, social services, and public health; and developing an
16action plan that includes information about changes and
17improvements to existing programs, statutes, and regulations
18that can be made by reallocating existing resources and not
19increasing State taxes; and be it further
 
20    RESOLVED, That we urge that the Governor call upon the
21Distressed Counties and Communities Commission to hold public
22hearings and issue a written report of its findings and
23recommendations to the Governor and to the General Assembly on
24or before April 15, 2013; and be it further
 

 

 

HR1279- 8 -LRB097 21920 AJO 70626 r

1    RESOLVED, That a suitable copy of this resolution be
2delivered to Governor Pat Quinn.