| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | AN ACT concerning economic development.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | represented in the General Assembly:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Tri-State Metro Area Economic Development Interstate Compact | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Act. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Section 3. Findings. The General Assembly finds and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | declares that: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | (1) In 2011 and 2012, the Organisation for Economic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Cooperation and Development, a 50-year-old Paris-based | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | international institution dedicated to promoting policies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | that will improve the economic and social well-being of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | people around the world, conducted its first-ever study of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | a regional economy in the United States and issued a full | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | and vigorous analysis of the economy in the Chicago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | metropolitan region. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | (2) The report included the following language | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | concerning the economic development pitfalls and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | challenges facing the Tri-State region: "Several recent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | examples of inter-state squabbling over finite (and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | diminishing) public resources or over business decisions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | to locate in a particular part of the tri-state region | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | point to the need to "take a step back" to integrate the |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | true functionality of the region into planning for | ||||||
2 | workforce development and economic development more | ||||||
3 | generally. Empirical evidence in the U.S. and elsewhere | ||||||
4 | demonstrates that trying to increase the number of firms in | ||||||
5 | a limited geographical area by luring them away from nearby | ||||||
6 | localities in the same functional region via tax incentives | ||||||
7 | is self-defeating in the long run, because it invites | ||||||
8 | retaliation, and some of the firms involved may move to | ||||||
9 | greener pastures when the tax breaks terminate, or may have | ||||||
10 | moved to the region anyway even without the tax breaks. It | ||||||
11 | is preferable by far to attract firms by showing that a | ||||||
12 | pool of talent and organisations exists in the region that | ||||||
13 | can help a newcomer exploit it. In the Tri-State region, | ||||||
14 | this petty, predatory zero-sum, intra-regional, | ||||||
15 | competitive approach to economic growth and job-creation | ||||||
16 | remains all too common." | ||||||
17 | Section 5. Tri-State Metro Area Economic Development | ||||||
18 | Interstate Compact. The State of Illinois enters into the | ||||||
19 | Tri-State Metro Area Economic Development Interstate Compact | ||||||
20 | in substantially the following form with all other states | ||||||
21 | joining the Compact: | ||||||
22 | ARTICLE I. PURPOSE | ||||||
23 | The Tri-State Metro Area Economic Development Interstate | ||||||
24 | Compact is established to shift the state economic development | ||||||
25 | strategies of the three states in our shared region away from |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | zero-sum tax breaks for large firms and towards a universal | ||||||
2 | policy that improves the business climate for all firms and | ||||||
3 | individuals in each of the three states. | ||||||
4 | The purpose of this Compact is to recognize that there is | ||||||
5 | no net benefit to the region from inducing a business to move | ||||||
6 | from one state in the region to another state in the region | ||||||
7 | because of a special tax break or other specific incentive | ||||||
8 | offered by a state government. | ||||||
9 | ARTICLE II. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES | ||||||
10 | In order to further the purposes of this Compact, member | ||||||
11 | states agree not to offer tax breaks to a company located in | ||||||
12 | another member state as an inducement to change the company's | ||||||
13 | location to the offering member state. | ||||||
14 | ARTICLE III. MEMBERSHIP | ||||||
15 | The states of Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin may become | ||||||
16 | members of this Compact by enacting the Compact. Any member | ||||||
17 | state may withdraw from this Compact in the same manner in | ||||||
18 | which they entered into the Compact. | ||||||
19 | ARTICLE IV. EFFECT | ||||||
20 | This Compact shall take effect when at least two of the | ||||||
21 | three eligible member states become a member of the Compact. | ||||||
22 | The Compact shall apply only to member states and shall not | ||||||
23 | apply to businesses located in a state that is eligible to | ||||||
24 | become a member state but has not done so. | ||||||
25 | ARTICLE V. DEFINITIONS | ||||||
26 | "Tax break" means any tax credit, reduction, or elimination |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | specifically applied to a particular company, so that the | ||||||
2 | company's state tax liability is less than the state tax | ||||||
3 | liability of other similarly situated businesses in that state.
|