|
|
|
96TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2009 and 2010 HB3986
Introduced 2/26/2009, by Rep. Kevin Joyce SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED: |
|
70 ILCS 1505/26.10-4 new |
|
70 ILCS 1505/26.10-5 new |
|
70 ILCS 1505/26.10-6 new |
|
70 ILCS 1505/26.10-7 new |
|
70 ILCS 1505/26.10-8 new |
|
70 ILCS 1505/26.10-9 new |
|
70 ILCS 1505/26.10-10 new |
|
70 ILCS 1505/26.10-11 new |
|
|
Amends the Chicago Park District Act. Authorizes the Chicago Park District to enter into "design-build" contracts. Defines "design-build". Specifies the solicitation process for design-build proposals. Sets forth the requirements for the award of design-build contracts.
|
| |
|
|
| FISCAL NOTE ACT MAY APPLY | |
|
|
A BILL FOR
|
|
|
|
|
HB3986 |
|
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
|
1 |
| AN ACT concerning local government.
|
2 |
| Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
|
3 |
| represented in the General Assembly:
|
4 |
| Section 5. The Chicago Park District Act is amended by |
5 |
| adding Sections 26.10-4, 26.10-5, 26.10-6, 26.10-7, 26.10-8, |
6 |
| 26.10-9, 26.10-10, and 26.10-11 as follows: |
7 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-4 new) |
8 |
| Sec. 26.10-4. Definitions. The following terms, whenever |
9 |
| used or referred to in this Act, have the following meaning |
10 |
| unless the context requires a different meaning: |
11 |
| "Delivery system" means the design and construction |
12 |
| approach used to develop and construct a project. |
13 |
| "Design-bid-build" means the traditional delivery system |
14 |
| used on public
projects that incorporates the Local Government |
15 |
| Professional Services Selection Act (50 ILCS 510/) and the
|
16 |
| principles of competitive selection.
|
17 |
| "Design-build" means a delivery system that provides |
18 |
| responsibility within a
single contract for the furnishing of |
19 |
| architecture, engineering, land surveying
and related services |
20 |
| as required, and the labor, materials, equipment, and
other |
21 |
| construction services for the project.
|
22 |
| "Design-build contract" means a contract for a public |
23 |
| project under this Act
between the Chicago Park District and a |
|
|
|
HB3986 |
- 2 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
|
1 |
| design-build entity to furnish
architecture,
engineering, land |
2 |
| surveying, and related services as required, and to furnish
the |
3 |
| labor, materials, equipment, and other construction services |
4 |
| for the
project. The design-build contract may be conditioned |
5 |
| upon subsequent
refinements in scope and price and may allow |
6 |
| the Chicago Park District to
make
modifications in the project |
7 |
| scope without invalidating the design-build
contract.
|
8 |
| "Design-build entity" means any individual, sole |
9 |
| proprietorship, firm,
partnership, joint venture, corporation, |
10 |
| professional corporation, or other
entity that proposes to |
11 |
| design and construct any public project under this Act.
A |
12 |
| design-build entity and associated design-build professionals |
13 |
| shall conduct themselves in accordance with the laws of this |
14 |
| State and the related provisions of the Illinois Administrative |
15 |
| Code, as referenced by the licensed design professionals Acts |
16 |
| of this State.
|
17 |
| "Design professional" means any individual, sole |
18 |
| proprietorship, firm,
partnership, joint venture, corporation, |
19 |
| professional corporation, or other
entity that offers services |
20 |
| under the Illinois Architecture Practice Act of
1989 (225 ILCS |
21 |
| 305/), the Professional Engineering Practice Act of 1989 (225
|
22 |
| ILCS 325/),
the Structural Engineering Licensing Act of 1989 |
23 |
| (225 ILCS 340/), or the
Illinois Professional
Land Surveyor Act |
24 |
| of 1989 (225 ILCS 330/).
|
25 |
| "Evaluation criteria" means the requirements for the |
26 |
| separate phases of the
selection process for design-build |
|
|
|
HB3986 |
- 3 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
|
1 |
| proposals as defined in this Act and may include the |
2 |
| specialized
experience, technical qualifications and |
3 |
| competence, capacity to perform, past
performance, experience |
4 |
| with similar projects, assignment of personnel to the
project, |
5 |
| and other appropriate factors. Price may not be used as a |
6 |
| factor in
the evaluation of Phase I proposals.
|
7 |
| "Proposal" means the offer to enter into a design-build |
8 |
| contract as submitted
by a design-build entity in accordance |
9 |
| with this Act.
|
10 |
| "Request for proposal" means the document used by the |
11 |
| Chicago Park District
to solicit
proposals for a design-build |
12 |
| contract.
|
13 |
| "Scope and performance criteria" means the requirements |
14 |
| for the public
project, including but not limited to, the |
15 |
| intended usage, capacity, size,
scope, quality and performance |
16 |
| standards, life-cycle costs, and other
programmatic criteria |
17 |
| that are expressed in performance-oriented and
quantifiable |
18 |
| specifications and drawings that can be reasonably inferred and
|
19 |
| are suited to allow a design-build entity to develop a |
20 |
| proposal.
|
21 |
| "Guaranteed maximum price" means a form of contract in |
22 |
| which compensation may vary according to the scope of work |
23 |
| involved but in any case may not exceed an agreed total amount.
|
24 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-5 new) |
25 |
| Sec. 26.10-5. Authorization for design-build; |
|
|
|
HB3986 |
- 4 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
|
1 |
| advertisement. |
2 |
| (a) The Chicago Park District shall have the power to enter |
3 |
| into design-build contracts. In addition to the requirements |
4 |
| set forth in its ordinances, the Chicago Park District shall |
5 |
| advertise a design-build solicitation at least once in a daily |
6 |
| newspaper of general circulation in Cook County. The date that |
7 |
| Phase I submissions by design-build entities are due must be at |
8 |
| least 14 calendar days after the date the newspaper |
9 |
| advertisement for design-build proposals is first published. |
10 |
| The advertisement shall identify the design-build project, the |
11 |
| due date, the place and time for Phase I submissions, and the |
12 |
| place where proposers can obtain a complete copy of the request |
13 |
| for design-build proposals, including the criteria for |
14 |
| evaluation and the scope and performance criteria. The Chicago |
15 |
| Park District is not precluded from using other media or from |
16 |
| placing advertisements in addition to the one required under |
17 |
| this subsection. |
18 |
| (b) The Chicago Park District may reject any and all bids |
19 |
| and proposals received and may readvertise for bids or issue a |
20 |
| new request for design-build proposals. |
21 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-6 new) |
22 |
| Sec. 26.10-6. Solicitation of design-build proposals. |
23 |
| (a) When the Chicago Park District elects to use the |
24 |
| design-build delivery
method, it must
issue a notice of intent |
25 |
| to receive proposals for the project at
least 14 days before |
|
|
|
HB3986 |
- 5 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
|
1 |
| issuing the request for the proposal. The Chicago Park District
|
2 |
| must publish the advance notice in a daily newspaper of general |
3 |
| circulation in Cook County. The
Chicago Park District is |
4 |
| encouraged to use publication of the notice in related |
5 |
| construction
industry service publications. A brief |
6 |
| description of the proposed procurement
must be included in the |
7 |
| notice. The Chicago Park District must provide a
copy of the
|
8 |
| request for proposal to any party requesting a copy. |
9 |
| (b) The request for proposal shall be prepared for each |
10 |
| project and must
contain, without limitation, the following |
11 |
| information: |
12 |
| (1) A preliminary schedule for the completion of the |
13 |
| contract.
|
14 |
| (2) The proposed budget for the project, the source of |
15 |
| funds, and the
currently available funds at the time the |
16 |
| request for proposal is submitted.
|
17 |
| (3) Prequalification criteria for design-build |
18 |
| entities wishing to submit
proposals.
The Chicago Park |
19 |
| District shall include, at a minimum, its normal
|
20 |
| prequalification, licensing, registration, and other |
21 |
| requirements, but nothing
contained herein precludes the |
22 |
| use of additional prequalification criteria
by the Chicago |
23 |
| Park District.
|
24 |
| (4) Material requirements of the contract, including |
25 |
| but not limited to,
the proposed terms and conditions, |
26 |
| required performance and payment bonds,
insurance, and the |
|
|
|
HB3986 |
- 6 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
|
1 |
| entity's plan to comply with the utilization goals |
2 |
| established by the corporate authorities of the Chicago |
3 |
| Park District for minority and women business enterprises |
4 |
| and to comply with Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human |
5 |
| Rights Act.
|
6 |
| (5) The performance criteria.
|
7 |
| (6) The evaluation criteria for each phase of the |
8 |
| solicitation.
|
9 |
| (7) The number of entities that will be considered for |
10 |
| the technical and
cost
evaluation phase.
|
11 |
| (c) The Chicago Park District may include any other |
12 |
| relevant information
that it
chooses to supply. The |
13 |
| design-build entity shall be entitled to rely upon the
accuracy |
14 |
| of this documentation in the development of its proposal. |
15 |
| (d) The date that proposals are due must be at least 21 |
16 |
| calendar days after
the date of the issuance of the request for |
17 |
| proposal. In the event the cost of
the project
is estimated to |
18 |
| exceed $12,000,000, then the proposal due date must be at least
|
19 |
| 28 calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request |
20 |
| for proposal.
The Chicago Park District shall include in the |
21 |
| request for proposal a
minimum of 30 days
to develop the Phase |
22 |
| II submissions after the selection of entities
from the Phase I |
23 |
| evaluation is completed. |
24 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-7 new) |
25 |
| Sec. 26.10-7. Development of design-build scope and |
|
|
|
HB3986 |
- 7 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
|
1 |
| performance criteria. |
2 |
| (a) The Chicago Park District shall develop, with the |
3 |
| assistance of a
licensed design professional, a request
for |
4 |
| proposal, which shall include scope and performance criteria.
|
5 |
| The scope and performance criteria must be in sufficient detail |
6 |
| and contain
adequate information to reasonably apprise the |
7 |
| qualified design-build entities
of the Chicago Park District's |
8 |
| overall programmatic needs and goals,
including criteria and |
9 |
| preliminary design plans,
general budget parameters, schedule, |
10 |
| and delivery requirements. |
11 |
| (b) Each request for proposal shall also include a |
12 |
| description of the level
of design to be provided in the |
13 |
| proposals. This description must include the
scope and type of |
14 |
| renderings, drawings, and specifications that, at a minimum,
|
15 |
| will be required by the Chicago Park District to be produced by |
16 |
| the
design-build entities.
|
17 |
| (c) The scope and performance criteria shall be prepared by |
18 |
| a design
professional who is an employee of the Chicago Park |
19 |
| District, or the Chicago Park District may
contract with an |
20 |
| independent design professional selected under the
Local |
21 |
| Government Professional Services Selection Act (50 ILCS 510/) |
22 |
| to provide these services.
|
23 |
| (d) The design professional that prepares the scope and |
24 |
| performance criteria
is prohibited from participating in any |
25 |
| design-build entity proposal for the
project.
|
|
|
|
HB3986 |
- 8 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
|
1 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-8 new) |
2 |
| Sec. 26.10-8. Procedures for design-build selection. |
3 |
| (a) The Chicago Park District must use a two-phase |
4 |
| procedure for the
selection of the
successful design-build |
5 |
| entity. Phase I of the procedure will evaluate and
shortlist |
6 |
| the design-build entities based on qualifications, and Phase II
|
7 |
| will
evaluate the technical and cost proposals. |
8 |
| (b) The Chicago Park District shall include in the request |
9 |
| for proposal
the
evaluating factors to be used in Phase I. |
10 |
| These factors are in addition to any
prequalification |
11 |
| requirements of design-build entities that the Chicago Park |
12 |
| District has set
forth. Each request for proposal shall |
13 |
| establish the relative importance
assigned to each evaluation |
14 |
| factor and subfactor, including any weighting of
criteria to be |
15 |
| employed by the Chicago Park District. The Chicago Park |
16 |
| District must maintain a
record of the evaluation scoring to be |
17 |
| disclosed in event of a protest
regarding the solicitation.
|
18 |
| The Chicago Park District shall include the following |
19 |
| criteria in every
Phase I
evaluation of design-build entities: |
20 |
| (1) experience of personnel; (2)
successful
experience with |
21 |
| similar project types; (3) financial capability; (4) |
22 |
| timeliness
of past performance; (5) experience with similarly |
23 |
| sized projects; (6)
successful reference checks of the firm; |
24 |
| (7) commitment to assign personnel
for the duration of the |
25 |
| project and qualifications of the entity's consultants; and (8) |
26 |
| ability or past performance in meeting or exhausting good faith |
|
|
|
HB3986 |
- 9 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
|
1 |
| efforts to meet the utilization goals for minority and women |
2 |
| business enterprises established by the corporate authorities |
3 |
| of the Chicago Park District and in complying with Section |
4 |
| 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. The Chicago Park |
5 |
| District may include any additional relevant criteria in Phase |
6 |
| I that it deems necessary for a proper qualification review.
|
7 |
| The Chicago Park District may include any additional relevant |
8 |
| criteria in
Phase I that
it deems necessary for a proper |
9 |
| qualification review.
|
10 |
| The Chicago Park District may not consider any design-build |
11 |
| entity for
evaluation or
award if the entity has any pecuniary |
12 |
| interest in the project or has other
relationships or |
13 |
| circumstances, including but not limited to, long-term
|
14 |
| leasehold, mutual performance, or development contracts with |
15 |
| the Chicago Park District,
that may give the design-build |
16 |
| entity a financial or tangible advantage over
other |
17 |
| design-build entities in the preparation, evaluation, or |
18 |
| performance of
the
design-build contract or that create the |
19 |
| appearance of impropriety. No design-build proposal shall be |
20 |
| considered that does not include an entity's plan to comply |
21 |
| with the requirements established in the minority and women |
22 |
| business enterprises and economically disadvantaged firms |
23 |
| established by the corporate authorities of the Chicago Park |
24 |
| District and with Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights |
25 |
| Act.
|
26 |
| Upon completion of the qualifications evaluation, the |
|
|
|
HB3986 |
- 10 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
|
1 |
| Chicago Park District shall
create a shortlist of the most |
2 |
| highly qualified design-build entities. The
Chicago Park |
3 |
| District, in its discretion, is not required to shortlist the
|
4 |
| maximum number of
entities as identified for Phase II |
5 |
| evaluation, provided however, no less than
2
design-build |
6 |
| entities nor more than 6 are selected to submit Phase II
|
7 |
| proposals.
|
8 |
| The Chicago Park District shall notify the entities |
9 |
| selected for the
shortlist in
writing. This notification shall |
10 |
| commence the period for the preparation of the
Phase II |
11 |
| technical and cost evaluations. The Chicago Park District must
|
12 |
| allow sufficient
time for the shortlist entities to prepare |
13 |
| their Phase II submittals
considering
the scope and detail |
14 |
| requested by the Chicago Park District.
|
15 |
| (c) The Chicago Park District shall include in the request |
16 |
| for proposal
the
evaluating factors to be used in the technical |
17 |
| and cost submission components
of Phase II. Each request for |
18 |
| proposal shall establish, for both the technical
and cost |
19 |
| submission components of Phase II, the relative importance |
20 |
| assigned to
each evaluation factor and subfactor, including any |
21 |
| weighting of criteria to be
employed by the Chicago Park |
22 |
| District. The Chicago Park District must
maintain a record of |
23 |
| the
evaluation scoring to be disclosed in event of a protest |
24 |
| regarding the
solicitation.
|
25 |
| The Chicago Park District shall include the following |
26 |
| criteria in every
Phase II
technical evaluation of design-build |
|
|
|
HB3986 |
- 11 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
|
1 |
| entities: (1) compliance with objectives
of
the
project; (2) |
2 |
| compliance of proposed services to the request for proposal
|
3 |
| requirements; (3) quality of products or materials proposed; |
4 |
| (4) quality of
design parameters; (5) design concepts; (6) |
5 |
| innovation in meeting the scope and
performance criteria; and |
6 |
| (7) constructability of the
proposed project. The Chicago Park |
7 |
| District may include any additional
relevant
technical |
8 |
| evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper selection.
|
9 |
| The Chicago Park District shall include the following |
10 |
| criteria in every
Phase II cost
evaluation: the guaranteed |
11 |
| maximum project cost and the time of
completion. The Chicago |
12 |
| Park District may include any additional relevant
technical
|
13 |
| evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper selection. The |
14 |
| guaranteed maximum project cost criteria weighing factor shall |
15 |
| not exceed 30%.
|
16 |
| The Chicago Park District shall directly employ or retain a |
17 |
| licensed
design
professional to evaluate the technical and cost |
18 |
| submissions to determine if the
technical submissions are in |
19 |
| accordance with generally
accepted industry standards.
|
20 |
| Upon completion of the technical submissions and cost |
21 |
| submissions evaluation,
the Chicago Park District may award the |
22 |
| design-build contract to the
highest
overall ranked entity.
|
23 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-9 new) |
24 |
| Sec. 26.10-9. Small design-build projects. In any case |
25 |
| where the total overall cost of the
project is estimated to be |
|
|
|
HB3986 |
- 12 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
|
1 |
| less than $12,000,000, the Chicago Park District
may combine
|
2 |
| the two-phase procedure for design-build selection described |
3 |
| in Section 26.10-8 into one combined
step, provided that all |
4 |
| the requirements of evaluation are performed in
accordance with |
5 |
| Section 26.10-8. |
6 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-10 new) |
7 |
| Sec. 26.10-10. Submission of design-build proposals. |
8 |
| Design-build proposals must be properly identified
and sealed. |
9 |
| Proposals may not be reviewed until after the deadline for
|
10 |
| submission has passed as set forth in the request for |
11 |
| proposals. All
design-build entities submitting proposals |
12 |
| shall be disclosed after the
deadline
for submission, and all |
13 |
| design-build entities who are selected for Phase II
evaluation |
14 |
| shall also be disclosed at the time of that determination. |
15 |
| Phase II design-build proposals shall include a bid bond in |
16 |
| the form and security as designated in
the request for |
17 |
| proposals. Proposals shall also contain a separate sealed
|
18 |
| envelope with the cost information within the overall proposal |
19 |
| submission.
Proposals shall include a list of all design |
20 |
| professionals and other entities
to which any work may be |
21 |
| subcontracted during the performance of the contract.
|
22 |
| Proposals must meet all material requirements of the |
23 |
| request for proposal or
they may be rejected as non-responsive. |
24 |
| The Chicago Park District shall
have the right
to reject any |
25 |
| and all proposals.
|
|
|
|
HB3986 |
- 13 - |
LRB096 09396 RLJ 19553 b |
|
|
1 |
| The drawings and specifications of any unsuccessful |
2 |
| design-build proposal shall remain the property of
the |
3 |
| design-build entity.
|
4 |
| The Chicago Park District shall review the proposals for |
5 |
| compliance with
the
performance criteria and evaluation |
6 |
| factors.
|
7 |
| Proposals may be withdrawn prior to the due date and time |
8 |
| for submissions for any cause. After
evaluation begins by the |
9 |
| Chicago Park District, clear and convincing
evidence of error
|
10 |
| is required for withdrawal.
|
11 |
| (70 ILCS 1505/26.10-11 new) |
12 |
| Sec. 26.10-11. Design-build award. The Chicago Park |
13 |
| District may award a design-build contract to
the highest
|
14 |
| overall ranked entity. Notice of award shall be made in |
15 |
| writing. Unsuccessful
entities shall also be notified in |
16 |
| writing. The Chicago Park District may
not request a
best and |
17 |
| final offer after the receipt of proposals. The Chicago Park |
18 |
| District may
negotiate with the selected design-build entity |
19 |
| after award but prior to
contract
execution for the purpose of |
20 |
| securing better terms than originally proposed,
provided that |
21 |
| the salient features of the request for proposal are not
|
22 |
| diminished.
|