|
|||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | HOUSE RESOLUTION 620
| ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, The British Petroleum oil refinery in Whiting, | ||||||
3 | Indiana is planning an expansion that would increase the | ||||||
4 | refinery's discharges into Lake Michigan significantly, | ||||||
5 | including 54% more ammonia (for a total discharge of 1,584 | ||||||
6 | pounds of ammonia per day) and 35% more total suspended solids | ||||||
7 | (for a total discharge of 4,925 pounds of total suspended | ||||||
8 | solids per day) on a daily basis, running contrary to years of | ||||||
9 | efforts to clean up the Great Lakes; and
| ||||||
10 | WHEREAS, The beaches of Lake Michigan provide a
significant | ||||||
11 | source of recreation, tourism, and drinking water
for the State | ||||||
12 | of Illinois and other states bordering the Lake;
and | ||||||
13 | WHEREAS, Last year, 81% of Illinois beaches were declared
| ||||||
14 | unsafe due to algae and other pollution problems; and | ||||||
15 | WHEREAS, Ammonia promotes algae blooms that can kill fish | ||||||
16 | in the Lake; and
| ||||||
17 | WHEREAS, The increased discharge into the Lake runs counter | ||||||
18 | to a provision of the federal Clean Water Act that prohibits | ||||||
19 | any downgrade in water quality near a pollution source, such as | ||||||
20 | the British Petroleum refinery; and |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | WHEREAS, Indiana State regulators are allowing British | ||||||
2 | Petroleum to install equipment that mixes its toxic waste with | ||||||
3 | clean lake water about 200 feet offshore, and actively diluting | ||||||
4 | pollution in Lake Michigan in this way is banned under Indiana | ||||||
5 | law; and | ||||||
6 | WHEREAS, Environmental regulators remain unsure about the | ||||||
7 | ecological effects of the relatively new refining process that | ||||||
8 | British Petroleum plans to use and the increased discharge into | ||||||
9 | Lake Michigan; and | ||||||
10 | WHEREAS, The United States Environmental Protection Agency | ||||||
11 | has not objected to the State of Indiana's decision to allow | ||||||
12 | the increased discharge by British Petroleum; and | ||||||
13 | WHEREAS, States rely on the federal government to enforce | ||||||
14 | interstate water quality, the federal Clean Water Act has | ||||||
15 | assisted states in cleaning up polluted waters and protecting | ||||||
16 | unpolluted waters, and states need new tools in addition to the | ||||||
17 | existing Clean Water Act to help protect ground and surface | ||||||
18 | waters from out-of-state pollution sources; and | ||||||
19 | WHEREAS, The federal Clean Air Act requires states to take | ||||||
20 | certain actions when permitting new sources of air pollution | ||||||
21 | that may increase pollution in nearby states and provides | ||||||
22 | remedies for states to address air pollution coming from |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | out-of-state sources; therefore, be it
| ||||||
2 | RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE | ||||||
3 | NINETY-FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we | ||||||
4 | urge British Petroleum to review and reconsider the wastewater | ||||||
5 | treatment facilities proposed to serve the expansion and | ||||||
6 | reconfiguration of its Whiting Refinery with the specific | ||||||
7 | intent to supplement or enhance treatment efficiencies to | ||||||
8 | eliminate or reduce the projected increases of ammonia nitrogen | ||||||
9 | and total suspended solids discharged into Lake Michigan; and | ||||||
10 | be it further | ||||||
11 | RESOLVED, That we strongly urge the United States | ||||||
12 | Environmental Protection Agency to follow a strict | ||||||
13 | interpretation of the federal Clean Water Act to minimize any | ||||||
14 | additional pollution into Lake Michigan; and be it further
| ||||||
15 | RESOLVED, That we urge the United States Environmental | ||||||
16 | Protection Agency to prohibit the Whiting, Indiana British | ||||||
17 | Petroleum refinery from increasing the refinery's current | ||||||
18 | discharges of ammonia and total suspended solids into Lake | ||||||
19 | Michigan until the ecological and environmental impact of the | ||||||
20 | increased discharges is fully understood by federal and state | ||||||
21 | environmental regulators; and be it further
| ||||||
22 | RESOLVED, That we urge the Illinois delegation to the |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | United States Congress to take legislative action against any | ||||||
2 | planned increase in the discharge of pollution into Lake | ||||||
3 | Michigan that is contrary to the federal Clean Water Act and | ||||||
4 | threatens the health of the environment of this State; and be | ||||||
5 | it further | ||||||
6 | RESOLVED, That we urge the United States Congress to enact | ||||||
7 | Clean Water Act legislation requiring states to take certain | ||||||
8 | actions when permitting new sources of water pollution that may | ||||||
9 | increase pollution in nearby states and providing remedies for | ||||||
10 | states to address water pollution coming from out-of-state | ||||||
11 | sources; and be it further | ||||||
12 | RESOLVED, That we urge the United States Environmental | ||||||
13 | Protection Agency to strengthen federal regulations to require | ||||||
14 | each state that permits a new source of water pollution to | ||||||
15 | provide written notice to all nearby states whose water quality | ||||||
16 | may be degraded by the new source at least 60 days before the | ||||||
17 | new source begins discharging pollution; and be it further | ||||||
18 | RESOLVED, That we encourage the federal government to take | ||||||
19 | action to give one state the right to bring an action in | ||||||
20 | federal court against another state that is causing or | ||||||
21 | contributing to water pollution that exceeds water quality | ||||||
22 | standards or otherwise adversely impacts the drinking water or | ||||||
23 | recreational uses of water in the first state; and be it |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | further | ||||||
2 | RESOLVED, That we urge the United States Environmental | ||||||
3 | Protection Agency to increase enforcement of existing clean | ||||||
4 | water laws to protect state waters from out-of-state pollution | ||||||
5 | sources, especially the Clean Water Act provision that | ||||||
6 | prohibits any decline in water quality even if limits on | ||||||
7 | pollution discharges are met; and be it further | ||||||
8 | RESOLVED, That a suitable copy of this resolution be | ||||||
9 | delivered to the administrator of the United States | ||||||
10 | Environmental Protection Agency, Stephen L. Johnson, and to the | ||||||
11 | Great Lakes National Program Manager for the United States | ||||||
12 | Environmental Protection Agency, Mary A. Gade, to each member | ||||||
13 | of the Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin delegations | ||||||
14 | to the United States Congress, and to the governors and state | ||||||
15 | legislative leaders of Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
|