|
|||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | HOUSE RESOLUTION
| ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, We, the members of the Illinois House of | ||||||
3 | Representatives, are bound by our constitutional oath to | ||||||
4 | "provide for the health, safety and welfare of the people" of | ||||||
5 | Illinois, and we recognize this can best be done by having the | ||||||
6 | lowest possible tax burden and by maximizing the number and | ||||||
7 | diversity of jobs and opportunities in Illinois, to make | ||||||
8 | Illinois competitive, fiscally sound, and economically | ||||||
9 | productive; and
| ||||||
10 | WHEREAS, A free, stable, and growing economy, low tax | ||||||
11 | rates, and low prices for Illinois consumers, leads to the | ||||||
12 | creation of the maximum number of new Illinois jobs, whereas | ||||||
13 | higher tax rates and higher prices of goods and services for | ||||||
14 | Illinois consumers would actually destroy Illinois jobs; and
| ||||||
15 | WHEREAS, There are essential public functions that are | ||||||
16 | legitimately filled by government, which derives its just | ||||||
17 | powers from the consent of the governed, including the power to | ||||||
18 | tax the people of Illinois at the minimum rate necessary to | ||||||
19 | fulfill these essential functions; and
| ||||||
20 | WHEREAS, Whenever Illinois taxes are higher than the | ||||||
21 | minimum needed to carry out essential public functions, that | ||||||
22 | government is moving away from the health, safety, and welfare |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | of the people of Illinois, no matter what the motivations are | ||||||
2 | of the people that raise these taxes; and
| ||||||
3 | WHEREAS, A proposed Gross Receipts Tax may soon be imposed | ||||||
4 | upon all Illinois goods and services sold by the private sector | ||||||
5 | within Illinois at a rate of up to 1.95%; and
| ||||||
6 | WHEREAS, The proposed tax would be imposed upon all | ||||||
7 | businesses regardless of whether they make a profit, and would | ||||||
8 | fall most harshly upon start-ups, struggling firms, and small | ||||||
9 | businesses; and
| ||||||
10 | WHEREAS, This proposal is poor tax policy, criticized by | ||||||
11 | economists and economic development experts across the nation | ||||||
12 | as exactly the direction Illinois should not go if we hope to | ||||||
13 | enjoy a growing economy; and | ||||||
14 | WHEREAS, This proposed Illinois Gross Receipts Tax, the | ||||||
15 | highest gross receipts tax rate in the nation, would be imposed | ||||||
16 | repeatedly upon the entire value of an Illinois good or service | ||||||
17 | each time it changes hands as it moves through the economic | ||||||
18 | process; and | ||||||
19 | WHEREAS, An example of this "pyramiding effect" can be seen | ||||||
20 | in agriculture, Illinois' primary industry, where the seeds, | ||||||
21 | the fertilizers, the farm chemicals, the machinery, and the |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | elevator services used by an Illinois grain farmer are all | ||||||
2 | scheduled to be taxed, and the full burden of all of these | ||||||
3 | taxes would be borne by the farmer; and | ||||||
4 | WHEREAS, Inputs used by many other Illinois industries and | ||||||
5 | professionals would also be taxed repeatedly under the "pyramid | ||||||
6 | effect"; and | ||||||
7 | WHEREAS, Much of the cost of this new tax, if it is | ||||||
8 | enacted, will be indirectly passed on to consumers of Illinois | ||||||
9 | goods and services, thereby creating a significant increase in | ||||||
10 | these costs and giving Illinoisans an incentive to buy | ||||||
11 | elsewhere, thereby destroying more Illinois jobs; and | ||||||
12 | WHEREAS, The better-trained a worker is, and the more | ||||||
13 | specialized the work that he or she does, the harsher the tax | ||||||
14 | would be upon his or her workplace; and | ||||||
15 | WHEREAS, The proposed Illinois Gross Receipts Tax is | ||||||
16 | precisely what a tax ought not to be in the modern economy, | ||||||
17 | and, if implemented, it would have a destructive effect upon | ||||||
18 | Illinois by repeatedly taxing specialized work and services; | ||||||
19 | and | ||||||
20 | WHEREAS, Only five U.S. states currently have a gross | ||||||
21 | receipts tax, and all of them levy this tax at a rate much |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | lower than 1.95%, which would be by far the highest GRT tax | ||||||
2 | rate in the nation; and | ||||||
3 | WHEREAS, Three of these five states use their (much lower) | ||||||
4 | gross receipts taxes to replace their income tax or their sales | ||||||
5 | tax, rather than trying to implement a gross receipts tax on | ||||||
6 | top of these two other taxes; and | ||||||
7 | WHEREAS, The neighboring and comparable State of Indiana | ||||||
8 | repealed its Gross Receipts Tax in 2002 for many reasons | ||||||
9 | including those described here; and | ||||||
10 | WHEREAS, House members and motivated local citizens have | ||||||
11 | held hearings throughout Illinois on the proposed Gross | ||||||
12 | Receipts Tax, and testimony and comments have been gathered | ||||||
13 | from a diverse variety of workers, consumers, farmers, and | ||||||
14 | small businesspeople, and the vast majority of these Illinois | ||||||
15 | citizens have told Springfield that they fervently oppose the | ||||||
16 | proposed new tax; therefore, be it | ||||||
17 | RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE | ||||||
18 | NINETY-FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we | ||||||
19 | oppose the Gross Receipts Tax proposed by the Governor of | ||||||
20 | Illinois; and be it further
| ||||||
21 | RESOLVED, That a copy of this resolution be presented to |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | the Governor of Illinois.
|