|
|
|
HJ0077 |
|
LRB095 12828 DRJ 38498 r |
|
|
1 |
| HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION
|
2 |
| WHEREAS, In the wake of the Supreme Court ruling in |
3 |
| National Labor
Relations Board v. Kentucky River Community |
4 |
| Care, Inc., et al., the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) |
5 |
| issued a series of decisions, known collectively as "Oakwood", |
6 |
| that expanded the definition of "supervisor" to include charge |
7 |
| nurses; and
|
8 |
| WHEREAS, The NLRB based its decision on the fact that |
9 |
| charge nurses have the ability "to assign and responsibly to |
10 |
| direct" other co-workers in their daily duties; and
|
11 |
| WHEREAS, The NLRB concluded that an employee who has the |
12 |
| ability to assign co-workers for as little as 10 to 15 percent |
13 |
| of his or her time can still be classified as a supervisor; and
|
14 |
| WHEREAS, The 10 to 15 percent threshold is so low that a |
15 |
| worker who assigns co-workers to tasks only one hour a day or |
16 |
| on one shift every 2 weeks and is assigned tasks by others the |
17 |
| remaining hours of the shift or days in the week could still be |
18 |
| deemed a supervisor; and
|
19 |
| WHEREAS, The ability to assign and direct co-workers is an |
20 |
| essential function for virtually all lead workers in every |
21 |
| industry and is not exclusive to supervisory employees; and
|
|
|
|
HJ0077 |
- 2 - |
LRB095 12828 DRJ 38498 r |
|
|
1 |
| WHEREAS, Supervisors are explicitly excluded from the |
2 |
| protections in the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), |
3 |
| including the right to organize and bargain collectively over |
4 |
| wages and working conditions, without facing employer |
5 |
| reprisals; and
|
6 |
| WHEREAS, The Oakwood decision calls into question the right |
7 |
| of charge nurses to remain in or join unions, potentially |
8 |
| stripping away rights of registered nurses in Illinois; and
|
9 |
| WHEREAS, Without bargaining unit protections, lead workers |
10 |
| could be stripped of numerous benefits, including the right to |
11 |
| overtime pay, seniority bidding, and job security based on the |
12 |
| "just cause" requirement; and
|
13 |
| WHEREAS, This decision focused on nurses, but the rationale |
14 |
| could be extended to other lead workers in all industries and a |
15 |
| recent report by the Economic Policy Institute estimated that |
16 |
| this decision could result in the loss of union rights for up |
17 |
| to 8,000,000 workers nationwide; and
|
18 |
| WHEREAS, Confusion over the meaning of supervisor, in the |
19 |
| wake of the Oakwood decision, has led the NLRB to hold dozens |
20 |
| of cases, including 60 involving union elections; and |
|
|
|
HJ0077 |
- 3 - |
LRB095 12828 DRJ 38498 r |
|
|
1 |
| WHEREAS, Union members have demonstrated their outrage |
2 |
| against the Oakwood decision in states across the country; and
|
3 |
| WHEREAS, The Re-Empowerment of Skilled and Professional |
4 |
| Employees and Construction Tradeworkers (RESPECT) Act has been |
5 |
| introduced in Congress by Representatives Robert Andrews |
6 |
| (D-New Jersey) and Don Young (R-Alaska) in the House and |
7 |
| Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Connecticut) in the Senate, and |
8 |
| enjoys bi-partisan support; and
|
9 |
| WHEREAS, The RESPECT Act would overturn the NLRB decision |
10 |
| by specifying that a supervisor must engage in supervisory |
11 |
| acts, in the interest of the employer, for the majority of his |
12 |
| or her time and by deleting the reference to the ability to |
13 |
| assign or direct; and
|
14 |
| WHEREAS, The RESPECT Act would protect the rights of nurses |
15 |
| to engage in collective bargaining, and collective bargaining |
16 |
| rights for nurses are critical to the public interest because |
17 |
| they are advocates for improved patient care and safety; and
|
18 |
| WHEREAS, The RESPECT Act would protect all workers from |
19 |
| being misclassified as supervisors to ensure that lead workers |
20 |
| in every industry can remain in and join unions to advocate for |
21 |
| safer workplaces, work together for better wages and benefits, |
22 |
| and have a voice at work; therefore, be it
|
|
|
|
HJ0077 |
- 4 - |
LRB095 12828 DRJ 38498 r |
|
|
1 |
| RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE |
2 |
| NINETY-FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, THE |
3 |
| SENATE CONCURRING HEREIN, that the Illinois General Assembly |
4 |
| calls on the Congress of the United States to support and pass |
5 |
| and the President to approve the bi-partisan RESPECT Act; and |
6 |
| be it further
|
7 |
| RESOLVED, That copies of
this resolution be delivered to |
8 |
| the President of the United States and each member of the |
9 |
| Illinois congressional delegation.
|