|
|
|
SR0734 |
|
LRB094 20417 DRH 58589 r |
|
|
1 |
| SENATE RESOLUTION
|
2 |
| WHEREAS, The General Assembly considered and passed |
3 |
| unanimously House Bill 2449 as amended (Public Act 094-0318); |
4 |
| and
|
5 |
| WHEREAS, House Bill 2449 prohibited the railroads |
6 |
| operating within Illinois from denying medical treatment to or |
7 |
| interfering with the medical treatment of injured railroad |
8 |
| workers; and
|
9 |
| WHEREAS, The bill as introduced in the House of |
10 |
| Representatives would have made a violation of the proposed Act |
11 |
| a business offense; House Bill 2449 would have also conferred |
12 |
| enforcement authority upon the State's Attorney in whose county |
13 |
| the offense allegedly occurred; and
|
14 |
| WHEREAS, The railroads in the State represented by the |
15 |
| Illinois Railroad Association strongly opposed the bill as |
16 |
| introduced and passed by the House of Representatives; when the |
17 |
| House Bill was filed with the Secretary of the Senate, the |
18 |
| Railroad Association offered an amendment in the Senate which, |
19 |
| among other things, deleted the House language and substituted |
20 |
| language that conferred exclusive enforcement authority for |
21 |
| any violations of the Act upon the Illinois Commerce |
22 |
| Commission, the Commission having an historic regulatory |
23 |
| jurisdiction over Illinois railroads; in addition, the |
24 |
| amendment supported by the railroads deleted language as to a |
25 |
| business offense and substituted language conferring authority |
26 |
| upon the Illinois Commerce Commission to levy fines within the |
27 |
| Commission's discretion; and
|
28 |
| WHEREAS, The railroads' stated to the Senate sponsors and |
29 |
| supporters that, in consideration of the adoption of the Senate |
30 |
| amendment, the railroads would not oppose the legislation or |
31 |
| the public policy that was the gist of the legislation; the |
|
|
|
SR0734 |
- 2 - |
LRB094 20417 DRH 58589 r |
|
|
1 |
| Senate sponsors and co-sponsors, by reasonable inference, |
2 |
| moreover, assumed that the railroads would not challenge the |
3 |
| legality of this legislation upon its passage and enactment |
4 |
| into law, especially prior to a pattern of enforcement being |
5 |
| developed by the Illinois Commerce Commission; and |
6 |
| WHEREAS, The railroads, on March 14, 2006, filed in the |
7 |
| United States District Court for the Central District of |
8 |
| Illinois, Springfield Division, in the case of BNSF Railway |
9 |
| Company, et al., v. Charles E. Box, et al., Case No. |
10 |
| 3:06-CV-03052, a complaint for a declaratory judgment that |
11 |
| Public Act 94-0318 is preempted by federal regulations; and
|
12 |
| WHEREAS, The Illinois General Assembly finds that the |
13 |
| recent legal action of the railroads in the State regarding |
14 |
| this legislation is a breach of faith with the General |
15 |
| Assembly; therefore, be it |
16 |
| RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE OF THE NINETY-FOURTH GENERAL |
17 |
| ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we respectfully request |
18 |
| the United States District Court for the Central District of |
19 |
| Illinois, Springfield Division, to find that the plaintiff |
20 |
| railroads within the State of Illinois, in the case of BNSF |
21 |
| Railway Company, et al., v. Charles E. Box, et al., Case No. |
22 |
| 3:06-CV-03052, are estopped from challenging the legality of |
23 |
| Public Act 94-0318; and be it further
|
24 |
| RESOLVED, That suitable copies of this resolution be |
25 |
| delivered to Honorable Jeanne E. Scott, United States District |
26 |
| Judge, and Honorable Byron G. Cudmore, United States Magistrate |
27 |
| Judge, of the United States District Court for the Central |
28 |
| District of Illinois, Springfield Division.
|