|
|
|
HB4864 Engrossed |
|
LRB094 16739 NHT 52010 b |
|
|
1 |
| AN ACT concerning education.
|
2 |
| Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, |
3 |
| represented in the General Assembly:
|
4 |
| Section 5. The School Code is amended by changing Section |
5 |
| 2-3.25d as follows:
|
6 |
| (105 ILCS 5/2-3.25d) (from Ch. 122, par. 2-3.25d)
|
7 |
| Sec. 2-3.25d. Academic early warning and watch status.
|
8 |
| (a) Beginning with the 2005-2006 school year, unless the |
9 |
| federal government formally disapproves of such policy through |
10 |
| the submission and review process for the Illinois |
11 |
| Accountability Workbook, those
schools that do not meet |
12 |
| adequate yearly progress criteria for 2 consecutive annual
|
13 |
| calculations for the percentage meeting or exceeding standards
|
14 |
| in the same subgroup and in the same subject or in their |
15 |
| participation rate for the same subgroup and in the same |
16 |
| subject or in their , attendance rate , or graduation rate
shall |
17 |
| be placed on academic early warning status for the next school |
18 |
| year.
Schools on academic early warning status that do not meet |
19 |
| adequate yearly
progress criteria for a third annual |
20 |
| calculation for the percentage meeting or exceeding standards
|
21 |
| in the same subgroup and in the same subject or in their |
22 |
| participation rate for the same subgroup and in the same |
23 |
| subject or in their , attendance rate , or graduation rate
shall |
24 |
| remain on academic early
warning status. Schools on academic |
25 |
| early warning status that do not meet
adequate yearly progress |
26 |
| criteria for a fourth annual calculation for the percentage |
27 |
| meeting or exceeding standards in the same subgroup and in the |
28 |
| same subject or in their participation rate for the same |
29 |
| subgroup and in the same subject or in their , attendance rate ,
|
30 |
| or graduation rate shall be
placed
on initial academic watch |
31 |
| status. Schools on academic watch status that do not
meet |
32 |
| adequate yearly progress criteria for a fifth or subsequent |
|
|
|
HB4864 Engrossed |
- 2 - |
LRB094 16739 NHT 52010 b |
|
|
1 |
| annual
calculation for the percentage meeting or exceeding |
2 |
| standards in the same subgroup and in the same subject or in |
3 |
| their participation rate for the same subgroup and in the same |
4 |
| subject or in their , attendance rate , or graduation rate shall |
5 |
| remain on academic watch status. Schools on academic early
|
6 |
| warning or academic watch status that meet adequate yearly |
7 |
| progress criteria
for
one annual calculation
shall be |
8 |
| considered as having
met
expectations and shall be removed from |
9 |
| any status designation.
|
10 |
| The school district of a school placed on either academic |
11 |
| early warning
status or academic watch status may appeal the |
12 |
| status to the State Board of
Education in accordance with |
13 |
| Section 2-3.25m of this Code.
|
14 |
| A school district that has one or more schools on academic |
15 |
| early warning
or academic watch status shall prepare a revised |
16 |
| School Improvement Plan or
amendments thereto setting forth the |
17 |
| district's expectations for removing each
school from academic |
18 |
| early warning or academic watch status and for improving
|
19 |
| student performance in the affected school or schools. |
20 |
| Districts operating
under
Article 34 of this Code may prepare |
21 |
| the School Improvement Plan required under
Section 34-2.4 of |
22 |
| this Code.
|
23 |
| The revised School Improvement Plan for a school
that is |
24 |
| initially placed on academic early warning status
or that |
25 |
| remains on
academic early warning status after a third annual |
26 |
| calculation
must be approved by
the
school board (and by the |
27 |
| school's local school council in a district operating
under |
28 |
| Article 34 of this Code, unless the school is on probation |
29 |
| pursuant to
subsection (c) of Section
34-8.3 of this Code).
|
30 |
| The revised School Improvement Plan for a school placed on |
31 |
| initial
academic watch status after a fourth annual calculation |
32 |
| must be approved by the
school board (and by the school's local |
33 |
| school council in a district operating
under Article 34 of this |
34 |
| Code, unless the school is on probation pursuant to
subsection |
35 |
| (c) of Section
34-8.3 of this Code) and the State |
36 |
| Superintendent of Education.
|
|
|
|
HB4864 Engrossed |
- 3 - |
LRB094 16739 NHT 52010 b |
|
|
1 |
| The revised School Improvement Plan for a school that |
2 |
| remains on
academic watch status after a fifth annual |
3 |
| calculation must be approved by the
school board (and by the |
4 |
| school's local school council in a district operating
under |
5 |
| Article 34 of this Code, unless the school is on probation |
6 |
| pursuant to
subsection (c) of Section
34-8.3 of this Code) and |
7 |
| the State Superintendent of Education.
In addition, the |
8 |
| district must develop a school restructuring plan for the
|
9 |
| school that
must
be approved by the school board (and by the |
10 |
| school's local school council in a
district operating under |
11 |
| Article 34 of this Code) and subsequently approved by
the State |
12 |
| Superintendent of Education.
|
13 |
| A school on academic watch status that does not meet |
14 |
| adequate yearly
progress criteria for a sixth annual |
15 |
| calculation shall implement its approved
school restructuring |
16 |
| plan beginning with the next school year, subject to the
State
|
17 |
| interventions specified in Section 2-3.25f of this Code.
|
18 |
| (b) Beginning with the 2005-2006 school year, unless the |
19 |
| federal government formally disapproves of such policy through |
20 |
| the submission and review process for the Illinois |
21 |
| Accountability Workbook, those
school districts that do not |
22 |
| meet adequate yearly progress
criteria for 2 consecutive
annual
|
23 |
| calculations for the percentage meeting or exceeding standards
|
24 |
| in the same subgroup and in the same subject or in their |
25 |
| participation rate for the same subgroup and in the same |
26 |
| subject or in their , attendance rate , or graduation rate shall |
27 |
| be placed on academic early warning status for the next
school |
28 |
| year. Districts on academic early warning status that do not |
29 |
| meet
adequate yearly progress criteria for a third annual |
30 |
| calculation for the percentage meeting or exceeding standards
|
31 |
| in the same subgroup and in the same subject or in their |
32 |
| participation rate for the same subgroup and in the same |
33 |
| subject or in their , attendance rate , or graduation rate
shall |
34 |
| remain
on
academic early warning status. Districts on academic |
35 |
| early warning status that
do not meet adequate yearly progress |
36 |
| criteria for a fourth annual calculation for the percentage |
|
|
|
HB4864 Engrossed |
- 4 - |
LRB094 16739 NHT 52010 b |
|
|
1 |
| meeting or exceeding standards
in the same subgroup and in the |
2 |
| same subject or in their participation rate for the same |
3 |
| subgroup and in the same subject or in their , attendance rate ,
|
4 |
| or graduation rate shall
be placed on initial academic watch |
5 |
| status. Districts on academic watch status
that do not meet |
6 |
| adequate yearly progress criteria for a fifth or subsequent
|
7 |
| annual calculation for the percentage meeting or exceeding |
8 |
| standards in the same subgroup and in the same subject or in |
9 |
| their participation rate for the same subgroup and in the same |
10 |
| subject or in their , attendance rate , or graduation rate shall |
11 |
| remain on academic watch status. Districts on academic
early |
12 |
| warning or academic watch status that meet adequate yearly |
13 |
| progress
criteria for one annual calculation shall be
|
14 |
| considered
as having met expectations and shall be removed from |
15 |
| any status designation.
|
16 |
| A district placed on either academic early warning status |
17 |
| or academic
watch status may appeal the status to the State |
18 |
| Board of Education in
accordance with Section 2-3.25m of this |
19 |
| Code.
|
20 |
| Districts on academic early warning or academic watch |
21 |
| status shall
prepare a District Improvement Plan or amendments |
22 |
| thereto setting forth the
district's expectations for removing |
23 |
| the district from academic early warning
or
academic watch |
24 |
| status and for improving student performance in the district.
|
25 |
| The
District Improvement Plan for a district that is |
26 |
| initially placed on academic
early
warning status must be |
27 |
| approved by the school board.
|
28 |
| The revised District Improvement Plan for a district that |
29 |
| remains on
academic early warning status after a third annual |
30 |
| calculation must be approved
by the school board.
|
31 |
| The revised District Improvement Plan for a district on |
32 |
| initial academic
watch
status after a fourth annual calculation |
33 |
| must be approved by the school board
and the State |
34 |
| Superintendent of Education.
|
35 |
| The revised District Improvement Plan for a district that |
36 |
| remains on
academic watch status after a fifth annual |
|
|
|
HB4864 Engrossed |
- 5 - |
LRB094 16739 NHT 52010 b |
|
|
1 |
| calculation must be approved by the
school board and the State |
2 |
| Superintendent of Education. In addition, the
district must
|
3 |
| develop a district restructuring plan that must be approved by |
4 |
| the school
board and the State Superintendent of Education.
|
5 |
| A district on academic watch status that does not meet |
6 |
| adequate yearly
progress criteria for a sixth annual |
7 |
| calculation shall implement its approved
district |
8 |
| restructuring plan beginning with the next school year, subject |
9 |
| to
the State
interventions specified in Section 2-3.25f of this |
10 |
| Code.
|
11 |
| (c) All revised School and District Improvement Plans shall |
12 |
| be developed
in collaboration with staff in the affected school |
13 |
| or school district. All
revised
School and District Improvement |
14 |
| Plans shall be developed, submitted, and
approved pursuant to |
15 |
| rules adopted by the State Board of Education. The
revised |
16 |
| Improvement Plan shall address measurable outcomes for |
17 |
| improving
student performance so that such performance meets |
18 |
| adequate yearly progress
criteria as specified by the State |
19 |
| Board of Education.
|
20 |
| (d) All federal requirements apply to schools and school |
21 |
| districts utilizing
federal funds under Title I, Part A of the |
22 |
| federal Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965. |
23 |
| (e) The State Board of Education, from any moneys it may |
24 |
| have available for this purpose, must implement
and administer |
25 |
| a grant
program that provides 2-year grants to school districts |
26 |
| on the academic watch
list and other school districts that have |
27 |
| the lowest achieving students, as
determined by the State Board |
28 |
| of Education, to be
used to improve student achievement.
In |
29 |
| order
to receive a
grant under this program, a school district |
30 |
| must establish an accountability
program. The
accountability |
31 |
| program must involve the use of statewide testing standards and
|
32 |
| local
evaluation measures. A grant shall be automatically |
33 |
| renewed when achievement
goals are met. The Board may adopt any |
34 |
| rules necessary to implement and
administer this grant program.
|
35 |
| (Source: P.A. 93-470, eff. 8-8-03; 93-890, eff. 8-9-04; 94-666, |
36 |
| eff. 8-23-05.)
|