|
|
|
HR0973 |
|
LRB093 22288 WGH 51341 r |
|
|
1 |
| HOUSE RESOLUTION
|
2 |
| WHEREAS, The Department of Central Management Services |
3 |
| recently decided to replace Vision Service
Plan (VSP) with |
4 |
| Spectera as the administrator of the vision care benefit plan |
5 |
| for State employees, dependents, and retirees beginning in |
6 |
| Fiscal Year 2005; and
|
7 |
| WHEREAS, Developing a long-term relationship with a |
8 |
| trusted family ophthalmologist or optometrist and a trusted |
9 |
| family optician can greatly improve the quality of vision care; |
10 |
| however, a move from VSP to Spectera would require some State |
11 |
| employees to seek new providers in order to continue to receive |
12 |
| in-network services since Spectera would be the only vision |
13 |
| care benefit plan choice; and |
14 |
| WHEREAS, Job preservation is a high priority for the State |
15 |
| of Illinois; however, a move from VSP to Spectera would |
16 |
| adversely affect Illinois jobs and businesses and our State's |
17 |
| economy because Spectera would require some providers to use |
18 |
| Spectera's dispensing laboratory in Maryland rather than the |
19 |
| dispensing laboratories throughout Illinois that are now used |
20 |
| by VSP providers; and
|
21 |
| WHEREAS, The Illinois Economic and Fiscal Commission |
22 |
| reportedly voted on May 18, 2004 to extend the State's contract |
23 |
| with VSP for Fiscal Year 2005, and it the Department of Central |
24 |
| Management Services has reportedly agreed to reverse its |
25 |
| earlier decision and negotiate with VSP for a contract for |
26 |
| Fiscal Year 2005; however, this is a matter of continuing |
27 |
| concern; and |
28 |
| WHEREAS, All of the consequences of any action taken should |
29 |
| be fully considered in determining whether that action is in |
30 |
| the best interests of the State of Illinois; therefore, be it
|