|
| | SR0891 | | LRB103 39894 LAW 70886 r |
|
|
1 | | SENATE RESOLUTION |
2 | | WHEREAS, In August 1993, a Memorandum of Agreement |
3 | | (Agreement) was executed to recognize that the Illinois |
4 | | Shoreline Erosion Interim 3 Project (Project) would affect |
5 | | portions of the Chicago shoreline that are historic properties |
6 | | listed or eligible for listing on the U.S. National Register |
7 | | of Historic Places (NRHP); and |
8 | | WHEREAS, The Agreement prioritizes the preservation of the |
9 | | historic properties and elements on the shoreline, with repair |
10 | | and rehabilitation to be performed consistent with the |
11 | | Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of |
12 | | Historic Properties and Guidelines for the Treatment of |
13 | | Cultural Landscapes (SOI standards), and aims for a design |
14 | | plan that would lead to a finding of No Adverse Effects (NAE) |
15 | | by the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO); and |
16 | | WHEREAS, The Chicago District of the U.S. Army Corps of |
17 | | Engineers (USACE) has consulted with the Advisory Council on |
18 | | Historic Preservation (ACHP) and SHPO pursuant to 36 CFR Part |
19 | | 800 and Section 106 of the 1965 National Historic Preservation |
20 | | Act to define the Agreement and prioritize the protection of |
21 | | the historic properties at Promontory Point so that the |
22 | | designs and planning for the shoreline management developed |
23 | | for Promontory Point would allow for a finding of No Adverse |
|
| | SR0891 | - 2 - | LRB103 39894 LAW 70886 r |
|
|
1 | | Effect (NAE); and |
2 | | WHEREAS, The Agreement requires amending because the |
3 | | construction and rehabilitation of the Promontory Point reach |
4 | | of the original Project was not completed; and |
5 | | WHEREAS, A major component of the uncompleted Project is |
6 | | Promontory Point, a 40-acre peninsula at the south end of |
7 | | Burnham Park, Chicago, comprising the Area of Potential |
8 | | Effects (APE), herein referred to as the "Undertaking"; and |
9 | | WHEREAS, The scope of the Undertaking includes the |
10 | | pre-design, review, design planning, construction, and |
11 | | maintenance of the step-stone limestone revetment and |
12 | | promenade at Promontory Point for erosion control and storm |
13 | | damage management, and it specifically includes the repair and |
14 | | rehabilitation of the step-stone limestone revetment and |
15 | | promenade at Promontory Point, approximately 3,200 linear feet |
16 | | of shoreline between East 54th and 56th Streets; and |
17 | | WHEREAS, The step-stone limestone revetment and promenade |
18 | | at Promontory Point is now subject to the continuation and |
19 | | funding of the Project consistent with the Agreement and the |
20 | | SOI standards; and |
21 | | WHEREAS, Section 8336 of the Water Resources Development |
|
| | SR0891 | - 3 - | LRB103 39894 LAW 70886 r |
|
|
1 | | Act (WRDA) of 2022 in the National Defense Authorization Act |
2 | | for Fiscal Year 2023 appropriates funding to finish the |
3 | | uncompleted sections of the shoreline Project, including |
4 | | Promontory Point; the 2022 Bi-Partisan Infrastructure Law, |
5 | | Public Law 117-58, funds an internal, third-party review of |
6 | | Promontory Point; also, a City of Chicago (City) 2023 capital |
7 | | bond funds a $5m design and planning contract for Promontory |
8 | | Point; and |
9 | | WHEREAS, The Agreement also necessitates amendment because |
10 | | of the 24-year history of commitment and involvement by the |
11 | | local and City-wide community to seek a genuine preservation |
12 | | outcome at Promontory Point; and |
13 | | WHEREAS, On June 21, 2002, SHPO issued a letter providing |
14 | | its refusal to issue a finding of NAE in regards to proposed |
15 | | activities at Promontory Point for the Lake Michigan Shoreline |
16 | | Protection, as recorded under IPHA log #109170043WCK; and |
17 | | WHEREAS, The Agreement and SHPO's June 21, 2002 letter |
18 | | specify repair and rehabilitation to match the existing |
19 | | step-stone limestone revetment and promenade and to minimize |
20 | | impacts to the historic resources at Promontory Point under |
21 | | the SOI standards; and |
22 | | WHEREAS, Discussions led by then-Senator Obama with the |
|
| | SR0891 | - 4 - | LRB103 39894 LAW 70886 r |
|
|
1 | | USACE, the City of Chicago, the Chicago Park District (CPD), |
2 | | SHPO, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), |
3 | | and the consulting parties led to the 2006 Obama Scope of Work, |
4 | | which provided an agreed-upon path forward for a preservation |
5 | | approach and community engagement process to design planning |
6 | | and construction at Promontory Point; and |
7 | | WHEREAS, Section 5072 of the WRDA of 2007 directed but |
8 | | never funded a third-party, unbiased, independent preservation |
9 | | feasibility and cost analysis study of Promontory Point to be |
10 | | supervised by the Buffalo and Seattle offices of the USACE but |
11 | | was not deemed an element of the Project; and |
12 | | WHEREAS, Other third-party, independent marine engineering |
13 | | studies in 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2024 all demonstrated that |
14 | | Promontory Point remains functioning and operational for storm |
15 | | damage and shoreline protection, and that a preservation |
16 | | approach to repairing the step-stone limestone revetment and |
17 | | promenade can meet erosion control and storm damage protection |
18 | | requirements; and |
19 | | WHEREAS, Promontory Point was listed in the National |
20 | | Register of Historic Places (NRHP) on January 19, 2018, and it |
21 | | was designated a City of Chicago Landmark on April 19, 2023; |
22 | | and |
|
| | SR0891 | - 5 - | LRB103 39894 LAW 70886 r |
|
|
1 | | WHEREAS, The significant historic features of Promontory |
2 | | Point are identified as the pavilion field house, including |
3 | | its pathways, the meadow, and original plantings, four council |
4 | | rings, the step-stone limestone revetment, the promenade, the |
5 | | 55th Street underpass and its porticos, and the David Wallach |
6 | | Fountain; and |
7 | | WHEREAS, There are multiple conditions for the several |
8 | | elements of the structure of the revetment at Promontory |
9 | | Point, including the immediate parkland, the step-stone |
10 | | revetment, the promenade, the promenade sub-grade, and the |
11 | | timber cribbing; and |
12 | | WHEREAS, The SOI standards provide for numerous treatments |
13 | | and solutions to address the multiple conditions of the |
14 | | limestone revetment and its structural elements at various |
15 | | locations and sections of Promontory Point; and |
16 | | WHEREAS, Preserving the step-stone limestone revetment and |
17 | | promenade preserves the multi-generational, racial, and |
18 | | economic class community that has gathered at Promontory Point |
19 | | for almost 100 years; therefore, be it |
20 | | RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE OF THE ONE HUNDRED THIRD GENERAL |
21 | | ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we support the |
22 | | legitimate Community Preservation Plan for Promontory Point, |