103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2023 and 2024
SB3992

 

Introduced 11/19/2024, by Sen. Willie Preston

 

SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
 
New Act

    Creates the Best Customer Price Act. Provides that a public institution of higher education or a State agency may require best customer pricing for any goods it procures. Provides that, if goods are to be purchased by the State from a supplier or reseller, the supplier or reseller shall attest that the price is the best customer price. Provides that the supplier or reseller shall include a provision in the letter of supply from the manufacturer that the supplier or reseller can secure the supply and quantity of goods to be purchased, and that the manufacturer has extended the same best customer pricing from the manufacturer to each of the suppliers or resellers registered with the State for the goods to be purchased. Provides that, if a public institution of higher education or a State agency requires best customer pricing for the goods but does not believe the price is competitive, the public institution of higher education or the State agency may decline to award the bid. Effective immediately.


LRB103 42700 SPS 75936 b

 

 

A BILL FOR

 

SB3992LRB103 42700 SPS 75936 b

1    AN ACT concerning State government.
 
2    Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3represented in the General Assembly:
 
4    Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Best
5Customer Price Act.
 
6    Section 5. Findings. The General Assembly finds and
7declares that:
8        (1) It has been the long-standing public policy of
9    this State to provide a level playing field in procurement
10    for small and mid-sized businesses. Despite this policy,
11    the portion of State funds spent on small and mid-sized
12    businesses, especially minority-owned, women-owned, and
13    veteran-owned businesses, is persistently far below where
14    the General Assembly believes it should be.
15        (2) This State has a choice in implementing pricing
16    policy for goods. Manufacturers sometimes give their best
17    price to the largest suppliers and largest resellers,
18    leaving small and mid-sized suppliers and small and
19    mid-sized resellers to pay a higher price. Allowing
20    manufacturers to force smaller suppliers for State
21    purchases to pay a higher price excludes small suppliers
22    from any low-bid State procurement.
23        (3) On average, minority-owned, women-owned, and

 

 

SB3992- 2 -LRB103 42700 SPS 75936 b

1    veteran-owned businesses are smaller than incumbent firms
2    and that policies that level the playing field in
3    procurement for firms that are smaller will
4    disproportionately benefit minority-owned, women-owned
5    and veteran-owned businesses, rectifying past decades of
6    discrimination in a race-neutral and gender-neutral way.
7        (4) It has long been public policy to empower State
8    purchasing officials with the ability to require the most
9    favorable terms to be granted to this State on any
10    purchase of supplies or services, and extending this
11    policy to ensure the best customer pricing is extended by
12    manufacturers to this State's suppliers and resellers is
13    consistent with both federal procurement law and State
14    procurement law.
15        (5) Requiring the best customer price for procured
16    goods will create a more inclusive choice for State
17    procurement and a level playing field for all suppliers,
18    both from the manufacturers to suppliers or resellers and
19    from suppliers or resellers to this State.
20        (6) It is in the best interest of the taxpayers of this
21    State to ensure that this State's purchases of goods
22    always get the best customer pricing from all participants
23    in the transaction, both from the manufacturer to the
24    supplier or reseller and from the supplier or reseller to
25    this State.
 

 

 

SB3992- 3 -LRB103 42700 SPS 75936 b

1    Section 10. Definitions. As used in this Act:
2    "Best customer pricing" means the best price offered to
3any customer for the goods this State is seeking to buy,
4including price, discounts, commissions, rebates and other
5incentives that impact the consideration paid for the good.
6    "Letter of supply" means a document from the manufacturer
7to a supplier or reseller that indicates the supplier or
8reseller is able to secure the goods this State seeks to buy.
9    "Public institution of higher education" has the meaning
10given to that term in Section 1-13 of the Illinois Procurement
11Code.
12    "Reseller" means a registered vendor of this State that
13supplies goods the company does not manufacture.
14    "State agency" has the meaning given to that term in
15Section 1-15.100 of the Illinois Procurement Code.
16    "Supplier" means a registered vendor of this State that
17supplies goods the company does not manufacture.
 
18    Section 15. Best consumer pricing.
19    (a) A public institution of higher education or a State
20agency may require best customer pricing for any goods it
21procures. If goods are to be purchased by this State from a
22supplier or reseller, the supplier or reseller shall attest
23that the price is the best customer price. The supplier or
24reseller shall include a provision in the letter of supply
25from the manufacturer that the supplier or reseller can secure

 

 

SB3992- 4 -LRB103 42700 SPS 75936 b

1the supply and quantity of goods to be purchased, and that the
2manufacturer has extended the same best customer pricing from
3the manufacturer to each of the suppliers or resellers
4registered with this State for the goods to be purchased.
5    (b) Nothing in this Section shall require the manufacturer
6to extend best customer pricing to any supplier or reseller
7for any goods that are not purchased by this State.
8    (c) Nothing in this Section shall regulate or impact any
9commercial relationship between a manufacturer and a supplier
10or reseller for any goods that are not the subject of a State
11purchase.
 
12    Section 20. Declining bids. If a public institution of
13higher education or a State agency requires best customer
14pricing for the goods but does not believe the price is
15competitive, the public institution of higher education or the
16State agency may decline to award the bid.
 
17    Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon
18becoming law.