|
| | SB1805 Engrossed | | LRB101 08915 RJF 54005 b |
|
|
1 | | AN ACT concerning finance.
|
2 | | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
|
3 | | represented in the General Assembly:
|
4 | | Section 5. The Downstate Public Transportation Act is |
5 | | amended by adding Sections 2-19, 3-9.5, and 4-6 as follows: |
6 | | (30 ILCS 740/2-19 new) |
7 | | Sec. 2-19. Design-build authorization. |
8 | | (a) In connection with two-phase design-build selection |
9 | | procedures authorized in this Section, a participant may |
10 | | authorize, by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the then |
11 | | members of its governing body, the use of competitive selection |
12 | | and the prequalification of responsible bidders consistent |
13 | | with applicable federal regulations and this Section. |
14 | | (b) Two-phase design-build selection procedures shall
|
15 | | consist of the following: |
16 | | (1) A participant shall develop, through
licensed |
17 | | architects or licensed engineers, a scope of work statement |
18 | | for inclusion in the solicitation for phase-one proposals |
19 | | that defines the project and provides prospective offerors |
20 | | with sufficient information regarding the participant's |
21 | | requirements. The statement shall include criteria and |
22 | | preliminary design, and general budget parameters and |
23 | | general schedule or delivery requirements to enable the |
|
| | SB1805 Engrossed | - 2 - | LRB101 08915 RJF 54005 b |
|
|
1 | | offerors to submit proposals which meet the participant's |
2 | | needs. When the two-phase design-build selection procedure |
3 | | is used and the participant contracts for development of |
4 | | the scope of work statement, the participant shall contract |
5 | | for architectural or engineering services as defined by and |
6 | | in accordance with the Architectural, Engineering, and |
7 | | Land Surveying Qualifications Based Selection Act and all |
8 | | applicable licensing statutes. |
9 | | (2) The evaluation factors to be used in
evaluating |
10 | | phase-one proposals must be stated in the solicitation and |
11 | | must include specialized experience and technical |
12 | | competence, capability to perform, past performance of the |
13 | | offeror's team (including the architect-engineer and |
14 | | construction members of the team) and other appropriate |
15 | | technical and qualifications factors. Each solicitation |
16 | | must establish the relative importance assigned to the |
17 | | evaluation factors and the subfactors that must be |
18 | | considered in the evaluation of phase-one proposals on the |
19 | | basis of the evaluation factors set forth in the |
20 | | solicitation. Each design-build team must include a |
21 | | licensed design professional independent from the |
22 | | participant's licensed architect or engineer and a |
23 | | licensed design professional must be named in the phase-one |
24 | | proposals submitted to the participant. |
25 | | (3) On the basis of the phase-one proposal, the
|
26 | | participant shall select as the most highly qualified the |
|
| | SB1805 Engrossed | - 3 - | LRB101 08915 RJF 54005 b |
|
|
1 | | number of offerors specified in the solicitation and |
2 | | request the selected offerors to submit phase-two |
3 | | competitive proposals and cost or price information. Each |
4 | | solicitation must establish the relative importance |
5 | | assigned to the evaluation factors and the subfactors that |
6 | | must be considered in the evaluation of phase-two proposals |
7 | | on the basis of the evaluation factors set forth in the |
8 | | solicitation. A participant may negotiate with the |
9 | | selected design-build team after award but prior to |
10 | | contract execution for the purpose of securing better terms |
11 | | than originally proposed, provided the salient features of |
12 | | the design-build solicitation are not diminished. Each |
13 | | phase-two solicitation evaluates separately (A) the |
14 | | technical submission for the proposal, including design |
15 | | concepts or proposed solutions to requirements addressed |
16 | | within the scope of work, and (B) the evaluation factors |
17 | | and subfactors, including cost or price, that must be |
18 | | considered in the evaluations of proposals. |
19 | | (4) A design-build solicitation issued under the
|
20 | | procedures in this Section shall state the maximum number |
21 | | of offerors that are to be selected to submit competitive |
22 | | phase-two proposals. The maximum number specified in the |
23 | | solicitation shall not exceed 5 unless the participant with |
24 | | respect to an individual solicitation determines that a |
25 | | specified number greater than 5 is in the best interest of |
26 | | the participant and is consistent with the purposes and |
|
| | SB1805 Engrossed | - 4 - | LRB101 08915 RJF 54005 b |
|
|
1 | | objectives of the two-phase design-build selection |
2 | | process. |
3 | | (5) All designs submitted as part of the
two-phase |
4 | | selection process and not selected shall be proprietary to |
5 | | the preparers. |
6 | | (30 ILCS 740/3-9.5 new) |
7 | | Sec. 3-9.5. Design-build authorization. |
8 | | (a) In connection with two-phase design-build selection |
9 | | procedures authorized in this Section, a participant may |
10 | | authorize, by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the then |
11 | | members of its governing body, the use of competitive selection |
12 | | and the prequalification of responsible bidders consistent |
13 | | with applicable federal regulations and this Section. |
14 | | (b) Two-phase design-build selection procedures shall
|
15 | | consist of the following: |
16 | | (1) A participant shall develop, through
licensed |
17 | | architects or licensed engineers, a scope of work statement |
18 | | for inclusion in the solicitation for phase-one proposals |
19 | | that defines the project and provides prospective offerors |
20 | | with sufficient information regarding the participant's |
21 | | requirements. The statement shall include criteria and |
22 | | preliminary design, and general budget parameters and |
23 | | general schedule or delivery requirements to enable the |
24 | | offerors to submit proposals which meet the participant's |
25 | | needs. When the two-phase design-build selection procedure |
|
| | SB1805 Engrossed | - 5 - | LRB101 08915 RJF 54005 b |
|
|
1 | | is used and the participant contracts for development of |
2 | | the scope of work statement, the participant shall contract |
3 | | for architectural or engineering services as defined by and |
4 | | in accordance with the Architectural, Engineering, and |
5 | | Land Surveying Qualifications Based Selection Act and all |
6 | | applicable licensing statutes. |
7 | | (2) The evaluation factors to be used in
evaluating |
8 | | phase-one proposals must be stated in the solicitation and |
9 | | must include specialized experience and technical |
10 | | competence, capability to perform, past performance of the |
11 | | offeror's team (including the architect-engineer and |
12 | | construction members of the team) and other appropriate |
13 | | technical and qualifications factors. Each solicitation |
14 | | must establish the relative importance assigned to the |
15 | | evaluation factors and the subfactors that must be |
16 | | considered in the evaluation of phase-one proposals on the |
17 | | basis of the evaluation factors set forth in the |
18 | | solicitation. Each design-build team must include a |
19 | | licensed design professional independent from the |
20 | | participant's licensed architect or engineer and a |
21 | | licensed design professional must be named in the phase-one |
22 | | proposals submitted to the participant. |
23 | | (3) On the basis of the phase-one proposal, the
|
24 | | participant shall select as the most highly qualified the |
25 | | number of offerors specified in the solicitation and |
26 | | request the selected offerors to submit phase-two |
|
| | SB1805 Engrossed | - 6 - | LRB101 08915 RJF 54005 b |
|
|
1 | | competitive proposals and cost or price information. Each |
2 | | solicitation must establish the relative importance |
3 | | assigned to the evaluation factors and the subfactors that |
4 | | must be considered in the evaluation of phase-two proposals |
5 | | on the basis of the evaluation factors set forth in the |
6 | | solicitation. A participant may negotiate with the |
7 | | selected design-build team after award but prior to |
8 | | contract execution for the purpose of securing better terms |
9 | | than originally proposed, provided the salient features of |
10 | | the design-build solicitation are not diminished. Each |
11 | | phase-two solicitation evaluates separately (A) the |
12 | | technical submission for the proposal, including design |
13 | | concepts or proposed solutions to requirements addressed |
14 | | within the scope of work, and (B) the evaluation factors |
15 | | and subfactors, including cost or price, that must be |
16 | | considered in the evaluations of proposals. |
17 | | (4) A design-build solicitation issued under the
|
18 | | procedures in this Section shall state the maximum number |
19 | | of offerors that are to be selected to submit competitive |
20 | | phase-two proposals. The maximum number specified in the |
21 | | solicitation shall not exceed 5 unless the participant with |
22 | | respect to an individual solicitation determines that a |
23 | | specified number greater than 5 is in the best interest of |
24 | | the participant and is consistent with the purposes and |
25 | | objectives of the two-phase design-build selection |
26 | | process. |
|
| | SB1805 Engrossed | - 7 - | LRB101 08915 RJF 54005 b |
|
|
1 | | (5) All designs submitted as part of the
two-phase |
2 | | selection process and not selected shall be proprietary to |
3 | | the preparers. |
4 | | (30 ILCS 740/4-6 new) |
5 | | Sec. 4-6. Design-build authorization. |
6 | | (a) In connection with two-phase design-build selection |
7 | | procedures authorized in this Section, a participant may |
8 | | authorize, by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the then |
9 | | members of its governing body, the use of competitive selection |
10 | | and the prequalification of responsible bidders consistent |
11 | | with applicable federal regulations and this Section. |
12 | | (b) Two-phase design-build selection procedures shall
|
13 | | consist of the following: |
14 | | (1) A participant shall develop, through
licensed |
15 | | architects or licensed engineers, a scope of work statement |
16 | | for inclusion in the solicitation for phase-one proposals |
17 | | that defines the project and provides prospective offerors |
18 | | with sufficient information regarding the participant's |
19 | | requirements. The statement shall include criteria and |
20 | | preliminary design, and general budget parameters and |
21 | | general schedule or delivery requirements to enable the |
22 | | offerors to submit proposals which meet the participant's |
23 | | needs. When the two-phase design-build selection procedure |
24 | | is used and the participant contracts for development of |
25 | | the scope of work statement, the participant shall contract |
|
| | SB1805 Engrossed | - 8 - | LRB101 08915 RJF 54005 b |
|
|
1 | | for architectural or engineering services as defined by and |
2 | | in accordance with the Architectural, Engineering, and |
3 | | Land Surveying Qualifications Based Selection Act and all |
4 | | applicable licensing statutes. |
5 | | (2) The evaluation factors to be used in
evaluating |
6 | | phase-one proposals must be stated in the solicitation and |
7 | | must include specialized experience and technical |
8 | | competence, capability to perform, past performance of the |
9 | | offeror's team (including the architect-engineer and |
10 | | construction members of the team) and other appropriate |
11 | | technical and qualifications factors. Each solicitation |
12 | | must establish the relative importance assigned to the |
13 | | evaluation factors and the subfactors that must be |
14 | | considered in the evaluation of phase-one proposals on the |
15 | | basis of the evaluation factors set forth in the |
16 | | solicitation. Each design-build team must include a |
17 | | licensed design professional independent from the |
18 | | participant's licensed architect or engineer and a |
19 | | licensed design professional must be named in the phase-one |
20 | | proposals submitted to the participant. |
21 | | (3) On the basis of the phase-one proposal, the
|
22 | | participant shall select as the most highly qualified the |
23 | | number of offerors specified in the solicitation and |
24 | | request the selected offerors to submit phase-two |
25 | | competitive proposals and cost or price information. Each |
26 | | solicitation must establish the relative importance |
|
| | SB1805 Engrossed | - 9 - | LRB101 08915 RJF 54005 b |
|
|
1 | | assigned to the evaluation factors and the subfactors that |
2 | | must be considered in the evaluation of phase-two proposals |
3 | | on the basis of the evaluation factors set forth in the |
4 | | solicitation. A participant may negotiate with the |
5 | | selected design-build team after award but prior to |
6 | | contract execution for the purpose of securing better terms |
7 | | than originally proposed, provided the salient features of |
8 | | the design-build solicitation are not diminished. Each |
9 | | phase-two solicitation evaluates separately (A) the |
10 | | technical submission for the proposal, including design |
11 | | concepts or proposed solutions to requirements addressed |
12 | | within the scope of work, and (B) the evaluation factors |
13 | | and subfactors, including cost or price, that must be |
14 | | considered in the evaluations of proposals. |
15 | | (4) A design-build solicitation issued under the
|
16 | | procedures in this Section shall state the maximum number |
17 | | of offerors that are to be selected to submit competitive |
18 | | phase-two proposals. The maximum number specified in the |
19 | | solicitation shall not exceed 5 unless the participant with |
20 | | respect to an individual solicitation determines that a |
21 | | specified number greater than 5 is in the best interest of |
22 | | the participant and is consistent with the purposes and |
23 | | objectives of the two-phase design-build selection |
24 | | process. |
25 | | (5) All designs submitted as part of the
two-phase |
26 | | selection process and not selected shall be proprietary to |