| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | HOUSE RESOLUTION
| ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, The State of Illinois is the 6th most populous | ||||||
3 | state in the country; it is home to world-class
cities, | ||||||
4 | enriched communities, renowned tourist destinations, and is a | ||||||
5 | leader in many areas including
transportation, technology, | ||||||
6 | finance, manufacturing, agriculture, and, most importantly, | ||||||
7 | access to an
unrivaled labor force; and
| ||||||
8 | WHEREAS, There are many positive aspects of this State that | ||||||
9 | should be applauded and highlighted,
unfortunately, we find | ||||||
10 | ourselves at a true crossroads; years of fiscal | ||||||
11 | irresponsibility and political
malfeasance have resulted in an | ||||||
12 | undesirable state of affairs that has plagued and will continue | ||||||
13 | to loom over
the Land of Lincoln; and
| ||||||
14 | WHEREAS, Based on 2015 American Community Survey (ACS) data | ||||||
15 | collected by the U.S. Census
Bureau, Illinois experienced a | ||||||
16 | 3.7% increase when comparing the median household income | ||||||
17 | reported in
the 2014 ACS ($57,478) and the 2015 ACS ($59,588); | ||||||
18 | the 3.7% increase was just under the U.S. average
of 3.8%; | ||||||
19 | moreover, the states of Missouri and Wisconsin witnessed more | ||||||
20 | substantial increases; and | ||||||
21 | WHEREAS, Illinois has to move towards a future that seeks | ||||||
22 | and expects to be competitive in all
sectors; that is what |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | every State across America is doing in order to embolden their | ||||||
2 | residents and,
furthermore, attract the best and brightest | ||||||
3 | employees and employers; and | ||||||
4 | WHEREAS, It is with this reality in mind that Illinois | ||||||
5 | lawmakers now more than ever must act in order to
ensure that | ||||||
6 | the best days for Illinoisans are ahead of us; the time of | ||||||
7 | kicking the can down the road and
blatant inaction and | ||||||
8 | disregard is over; Illinois must unequivocally reinforce the | ||||||
9 | notion, not only to every
resident but to any person that may | ||||||
10 | wish to come to the Prairie State, that Illinois is truly | ||||||
11 | forward-looking; and | ||||||
12 | WHEREAS, There is no greater threat to Illinoisans | ||||||
13 | currently than that of continuing down the trajectory
that we | ||||||
14 | are on today; through years of laxity, unchecked spending, and | ||||||
15 | ever-growing means of overtaxation,
Illinois residents are | ||||||
16 | being subjected to incredible pressures to leave their homes | ||||||
17 | and relocate
elsewhere; and | ||||||
18 | WHEREAS, Illinois has among some of the highest tax burdens | ||||||
19 | of any state not only in the Midwest, but
in the country; | ||||||
20 | Illinois has one of the highest average property tax burdens in | ||||||
21 | the United States; Illinois residents are charged one of the | ||||||
22 | highest average combined State and local sales taxes;
if this | ||||||
23 | were not enough, Illinois has estate, corporate franchise, and |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | numerous other State and local
taxes that make taxpayers | ||||||
2 | reasonably question what Springfield is doing right; and | ||||||
3 | WHEREAS, The Tax Foundation's State Business Tax Climate | ||||||
4 | Index for 2018 ranked Illinois 29th on its
yearly report that | ||||||
5 | compares the states' tax systems; comparatively, Indiana was | ||||||
6 | ranked 9th, Michigan was
ranked 12th, and Missouri came in at | ||||||
7 | 16th most favorable; and | ||||||
8 | WHEREAS, Things must change for the better through fiscally | ||||||
9 | responsible and sustainable initiatives that
foster economic | ||||||
10 | growth and cease to be an over-encumbrance on Illinois | ||||||
11 | taxpayers; this is why proposals
such as those calling for a | ||||||
12 | graduated income tax to be adopted in this State must be denied | ||||||
13 | outright; and | ||||||
14 | WHEREAS, The Federation of Tax Administrators found in data | ||||||
15 | compiled for their 2015 state and local
revenues comparison | ||||||
16 | that, per capita, the average taxpayer paid a total of $5,751 | ||||||
17 | in state and local
taxes, the 12th highest in the country; when | ||||||
18 | comparing this amount to the percentage of an average
| ||||||
19 | taxpayer's income (11.7%), Illinois came in 8th highest in the | ||||||
20 | country; comparatively, not one of our
neighbor states (i.e., | ||||||
21 | Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, or Missouri) landed in the | ||||||
22 | top 15; and |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | WHEREAS, To continue on this senseless path of | ||||||
2 | overburdening and debilitating propositions of
increased | ||||||
3 | taxation and reckless spending is simply unconscionable; | ||||||
4 | proponents of a graduated income tax
offer that this is a | ||||||
5 | "fair" treatment of taxpayers, yet this is far from the truth; | ||||||
6 | and | ||||||
7 | WHEREAS, Studies have shown that states with graduated | ||||||
8 | income taxes impose an
increased burden on the middle-class; | ||||||
9 | this venture, instead of creating fairness, exasperates the tax | ||||||
10 | base; and | ||||||
11 | WHEREAS, States that impose graduated income tax rates, | ||||||
12 | which vary in application but
number 33 in all, present a | ||||||
13 | troublesome case for their residents, and would, undoubtedly, | ||||||
14 | present
an equally problematic case here in Illinois; looking | ||||||
15 | at California, for example, which has one of
the most so-called | ||||||
16 | progressive income tax bracket systems, with a base rate of 1% | ||||||
17 | and a top
marginal rate of 13.3%, an Illinois taxpayer that is | ||||||
18 | earning a median household income of
approximately $59,000 | ||||||
19 | would be subject to a 9.3% income tax rate under the Golden | ||||||
20 | State's
model - nearly doubling the current Illinois tax; using | ||||||
21 | the New York tax structure, the Illinois
taxpayer would be | ||||||
22 | subject to a 6.33% state tax rate; using the New Jersey model, | ||||||
23 | that same
Illinois taxpayer would be subjected to a 5.525% | ||||||
24 | income tax rate; and |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | WHEREAS, Graduated income taxes only create added burdens | ||||||
2 | and dissuade economic prosperity, two
unintended consequences | ||||||
3 | that proponents of enacting such a tax system fail to mention; | ||||||
4 | organizations
including the Civic Federation and Taxpayers' | ||||||
5 | Federation of Illinois have provided detailed analyses of
| ||||||
6 | hypothetical scenarios where Illinois would impose such a tax; | ||||||
7 | these figures might please proponents that
only focus on | ||||||
8 | increasing revenues, but it must be noted that there will be a | ||||||
9 | cost to such a proposal that one
group, Illinois families, will | ||||||
10 | have to pay for; and
| ||||||
11 | WHEREAS, National organizations, such as the Hoover | ||||||
12 | Institution, have outlined the gross inadequacies
of the | ||||||
13 | graduated income tax system; while it may appear to provide | ||||||
14 | equity, the so-called progressive
income tax punishes | ||||||
15 | hard-working, middle-class families, as they make up the | ||||||
16 | majority of the tax base;
there is nothing fair in making | ||||||
17 | average Illinoisans pay for the shortcomings of a legislature | ||||||
18 | that has
created a tax and spend paradigm that is | ||||||
19 | unsustainable; and
| ||||||
20 | WHEREAS, Proposals calling for a graduated income tax | ||||||
21 | introduced in recent years in the legislature
have failed to | ||||||
22 | even begin the discussion because legislators and proponents | ||||||
23 | alike realize that such an
initiative would lead to irreparable |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | damage that would only serve to further impair the economic
| ||||||
2 | outlook of Illinois; and
| ||||||
3 | WHEREAS, A move to amend the constitution to allow for such | ||||||
4 | a repugnant affront to Illinois families
would be an act of | ||||||
5 | utter insult to Illinois taxpayers and a dereliction of the | ||||||
6 | duty owed to taxpayers by
members of the legislative branch of | ||||||
7 | government, a body that is supposed to improve the general | ||||||
8 | welfare
and protect the best interests of all Illinoisans; | ||||||
9 | nothing about creating an unfair, unequal, and avaricious
tax | ||||||
10 | system helps the General Assembly accomplish these ends; | ||||||
11 | therefore, be it
| ||||||
12 | RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ONE | ||||||
13 | HUNDREDTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we | ||||||
14 | stand united in opposition to any measure that would allow the | ||||||
15 | creation of a graduated income tax on Illinois residents; and | ||||||
16 | be it further
| ||||||
17 | RESOLVED, That suitable copies of this resolution be | ||||||
18 | delivered to each member of the Illinois General
Assembly and | ||||||
19 | the Office of the Governor as a testament to our unwavering | ||||||
20 | commitment to improving the
day-to-day lives of families across | ||||||
21 | this great State.
|