HJ0138LRB100 22309 MST 41094 r

1
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION

 
2    WHEREAS, The Ninety-second Congress of the United States of
3America, at its Second Session, via supermajority vote of both
4Houses adopted a Joint Resolution to amend the Constitution of
5the United States of America with language commonly referred to
6as the "ERA" on March 22, 1972, with a seven-year deadline for
7ratification by the states, to March 22, 1979; and
 
8    WHEREAS, The ERA reads, "Section 1: Equality of rights
9under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United
10States or by any state on account of sex. Section 2: The
11Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate
12legislation, the provisions of this article. Section 3: This
13amendment shall take effect two years after the date of
14ratification."; and
 
15    WHEREAS, In 1983, Congressman F. James Sensenbrenner
16drafted and offered a commonsense abortion neutrality clause to
17the ERA, which reads, "Nothing in this Article shall be
18construed to grant, secure, or deny any right relating to
19abortion or the funding thereof."; and
 
20    WHEREAS, On January 22, 1973, the United States Supreme
21Court issued Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, overturning the
22abortion laws of 46 of the 50 states, including Illinois, and

 

 

HJ0138- 2 -LRB100 22309 MST 41094 r

1reading a right to abortion-until the moment of birth-into the
2United States Constitution, despite the Constitution not
3including any mention of abortion whatsoever and abortion not
4being allowed in the vast majority of states for most of U.S.
5history; and
 
6    WHEREAS, Only 30 of the necessary 38 states ratified the
7ERA by the 1979 deadline, with 24 of those ratifications
8specifically referring to that 1979 deadline, and with 5 states
9approving but then rescinding their ratifications; and
 
10    WHEREAS, In 1978, Congress attempted to effect, via a
11statute passed by a mere majority vote an extension of the
12ratification of the ERA, from the original deadline of seven
13years to June 30, 1982; and
 
14    WHEREAS, The United States District Court ruled on December
1523, 1981 in Idaho v. Freeman that the attempted ERA extension
16attempted by Congress was unconstitutional and that the
17rescissions of States from the ERA were constitutional and
18effective; and
 
19    WHEREAS, In the appeal of Idaho v Freeman (NOW v Idaho),
20decided after the attempted June 20, 1982 extended date for
21ratification, the United States Supreme Court vacated the
22court's opinion and remanded to the District Court with

 

 

HJ0138- 3 -LRB100 22309 MST 41094 r

1direction to dismiss the case as moot, thus indicating that the
2ERA was no longer properly before the states for ratification;
3and
 
4    WHEREAS, The Supreme Court has thus ruled that any action
5by the Illinois General Assembly purporting to ratify the Equal
6Rights Amendment as adopted by the Congress in 1972 would be
7illegal and unconstitutional; and
 
8    WHEREAS, One of the critical concerns of state legislators
9and citizens in the years post-Roe was the emerging argument by
10proponents that ERA could force taxpayer funding of abortions,
11reverse parental notice and consent requirements prior to an
12abortion performed on a minor, and otherwise eviscerate state
13abortion regulations; and
 
14    WHEREAS, When the ERA was reintroduced in Congress in 1983,
15numerous legislators and religious leaders, including
16then-Chicago Cardinal Joseph Bernardin and the National
17Conference of Catholic Bishops, stated that, while they wished
18to support ERA, they could not do so unless and until an
19abortion neutrality clause was added to ERA, to ensure ERA
20could not be used to force taxpayer-funded abortion, overturn
21parental notice laws, and other reasonable abortion
22regulations; and
 

 

 

HJ0138- 4 -LRB100 22309 MST 41094 r

1    WHEREAS, As part of the deliberations on ERA in 1983,
2hearings were held before the United States Senate Judiciary
3Constitution Subcommittee, where noted Illinois attorney and
4statesman Congressman Henry J. Hyde, testified that, "recent
5experience suggests that the ERA, if it is proposed and
6ratified without an explicit provision against its use as a
7proabortion device will, in fact, be used to sweep away the
8minimal protection of unborn children that the courts currently
9allow, and also to mandate tax funding for abortions"; and
 
10    WHEREAS, Congressman Hyde specifically recited in his
11testimony legal cases from 1978 Hawaii Right to Life v. Chang,
121980 Moe v. King (Massachusetts), and 1983 Fischer, Planned
13Parenthood, et al v. Department of Public Welfare
14(Pennsylvania), where the ACLU repeatedly argued that ERA
15mandated taxpayer-funded abortion; and
 
16    WHEREAS, The pro-choice sponsors of ERA rejected and
17refused to adopt the Sensenbrenner abortion neutrality
18language when ERA was reintroduced in 1983, which caused the
19reintroduced ERA to fail in the Congress; and
 
20    WHEREAS, In the years since, the Supreme Court of New
21Mexico decided NM Right to Choose/NARAL v. Johnson, unanimously
22holding that the New Mexico constitution's ERA requires
23taxpayer funded abortion; the Connecticut Superior Court

 

 

HJ0138- 5 -LRB100 22309 MST 41094 r

1decided Doe v. Maher, holding that the Connecticut
2constitution's ERA requires taxpayer funded abortion; the
3Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, decided Low-Income
4Women of Texas v. Bost, holding that Texas constitution's ERA
5requires taxpayer funded abortion (later reversed); the
6Illinois Appellate Court, 1st District, decided Hope Clinic v.
7Adams, holding that the Illinois constitution's clause
8guaranteeing equal protection for sex requires strict and
9presumably fatal scrutiny to be applied against the Illinois
10Parental Notice of Abortion Act (later reversed); and
 
11    WHEREAS, The Illinois General Assembly supports passage of
12the ERA in a modified form, to ensure ERA's neutrality on
13taxpayer funded abortion, parental notice prior to an abortion,
14and other regulations on abortion; therefore, be it
 
15    RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ONE
16HUNDREDTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, THE SENATE
17CONCURRING HEREIN, that we hereby urge Congress to adopt anew
18the ERA, with the common-sense abortion-neutral language of
19Congressman Sensenbrenner, and send it to the states for
20ratification; and be it further
 
21    RESOLVED, That suitable copies of this resolution be
22presented to the Speaker and Clerk of the United States House
23of Representatives, the President Pro Tempore and Secretary of

 

 

HJ0138- 6 -LRB100 22309 MST 41094 r

1the United States Senate, and the members of the Illinois
2Congressional Delegation.