| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION
| ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, The Ninety-second Congress of the United States of | ||||||
3 | America, at its Second
Session, via supermajority vote of both | ||||||
4 | Houses adopted a Joint Resolution to amend the
Constitution of | ||||||
5 | the United States of America with language commonly referred to | ||||||
6 | as the "ERA"
on March 22, 1972, with a seven-year deadline for | ||||||
7 | ratification by the states, to March 22, 1979; and
| ||||||
8 | WHEREAS, The ERA reads, "Section 1: Equality of rights | ||||||
9 | under the law shall not be denied or
abridged by the United | ||||||
10 | States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2: The | ||||||
11 | Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate | ||||||
12 | legislation, the
provisions of this article.
Section 3: This | ||||||
13 | amendment shall take effect two years after the date of | ||||||
14 | ratification."; and
| ||||||
15 | WHEREAS, In 1983, Congressman F. James Sensenbrenner | ||||||
16 | drafted and offered a commonsense
abortion neutrality clause to | ||||||
17 | the ERA, which reads, "Nothing in this Article shall be
| ||||||
18 | construed to grant, secure, or deny any right relating to | ||||||
19 | abortion or the funding thereof."; and | ||||||
20 | WHEREAS, On January 22, 1973, the United States Supreme | ||||||
21 | Court issued Roe v. Wade and
Doe v. Bolton, overturning the | ||||||
22 | abortion laws of 46 of the 50 states, including Illinois, and |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | reading
a right to abortion-until the moment of birth-into the | ||||||
2 | United States Constitution, despite the
Constitution not | ||||||
3 | including any mention of abortion whatsoever and abortion not | ||||||
4 | being allowed in
the vast majority of states for most of U.S. | ||||||
5 | history; and | ||||||
6 | WHEREAS, Only 30 of the necessary 38 states ratified the | ||||||
7 | ERA by the 1979 deadline, with 24
of those ratifications | ||||||
8 | specifically referring to that 1979 deadline, and with 5 states | ||||||
9 | approving but
then rescinding their ratifications; and | ||||||
10 | WHEREAS, In 1978, Congress attempted to effect, via a | ||||||
11 | statute passed by a mere majority
vote an extension of the | ||||||
12 | ratification of the ERA, from the original deadline of seven | ||||||
13 | years to June
30, 1982; and | ||||||
14 | WHEREAS, The United States District Court ruled on December | ||||||
15 | 23, 1981 in Idaho v.
Freeman that the attempted ERA extension | ||||||
16 | attempted by Congress was unconstitutional and that
the | ||||||
17 | rescissions of States from the ERA were constitutional and | ||||||
18 | effective; and | ||||||
19 | WHEREAS, In the appeal of Idaho v Freeman (NOW v Idaho), | ||||||
20 | decided after the attempted
June 20, 1982 extended date for | ||||||
21 | ratification, the United States Supreme Court vacated the | ||||||
22 | court's
opinion and remanded to the District Court with |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | direction to dismiss the case as moot, thus
indicating that the | ||||||
2 | ERA was no longer properly before the states for ratification; | ||||||
3 | and | ||||||
4 | WHEREAS, The Supreme Court has thus ruled that any action | ||||||
5 | by the Illinois General
Assembly purporting to ratify the Equal | ||||||
6 | Rights Amendment as adopted by the Congress in 1972
would be | ||||||
7 | illegal and unconstitutional; and | ||||||
8 | WHEREAS, One of the critical concerns of state legislators | ||||||
9 | and citizens in the years post-Roe
was the emerging argument by | ||||||
10 | proponents that ERA could force taxpayer funding of abortions,
| ||||||
11 | reverse parental notice and consent requirements prior to an | ||||||
12 | abortion performed on a minor, and
otherwise eviscerate state | ||||||
13 | abortion regulations; and | ||||||
14 | WHEREAS, When the ERA was reintroduced in Congress in 1983, | ||||||
15 | numerous legislators and
religious leaders, including | ||||||
16 | then-Chicago Cardinal Joseph Bernardin and the National
| ||||||
17 | Conference of Catholic Bishops, stated that, while they wished | ||||||
18 | to support ERA, they could not
do so unless and until an | ||||||
19 | abortion neutrality clause was added to ERA, to ensure ERA | ||||||
20 | could not
be used to force taxpayer-funded abortion, overturn | ||||||
21 | parental notice laws, and other reasonable
abortion | ||||||
22 | regulations; and |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | WHEREAS, As part of the deliberations on ERA in 1983, | ||||||
2 | hearings were held before the United
States Senate Judiciary | ||||||
3 | Constitution Subcommittee, where noted Illinois attorney and | ||||||
4 | statesman
Congressman Henry J. Hyde, testified that, "recent | ||||||
5 | experience suggests that the ERA, if it is
proposed and | ||||||
6 | ratified without an explicit provision against its use as a | ||||||
7 | proabortion device will, in
fact, be used to sweep away the | ||||||
8 | minimal protection of unborn children that the courts currently
| ||||||
9 | allow, and also to mandate tax funding for abortions"; and | ||||||
10 | WHEREAS, Congressman Hyde specifically recited in his | ||||||
11 | testimony legal cases from 1978
Hawaii Right to Life v. Chang, | ||||||
12 | 1980 Moe v. King (Massachusetts), and 1983 Fischer, Planned
| ||||||
13 | Parenthood, et al v. Department of Public Welfare | ||||||
14 | (Pennsylvania), where the ACLU repeatedly
argued that ERA | ||||||
15 | mandated taxpayer-funded abortion; and
| ||||||
16 | WHEREAS, The pro-choice sponsors of ERA rejected and | ||||||
17 | refused to adopt the Sensenbrenner
abortion neutrality | ||||||
18 | language when ERA was reintroduced in 1983, which caused the
| ||||||
19 | reintroduced ERA to fail in the Congress; and
| ||||||
20 | WHEREAS, In the years since, the Supreme Court of New | ||||||
21 | Mexico decided NM Right to Choose/NARAL v. Johnson, unanimously | ||||||
22 | holding that the New Mexico constitution's ERA requires
| ||||||
23 | taxpayer funded abortion; the Connecticut Superior Court |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | decided Doe v. Maher, holding that
the Connecticut | ||||||
2 | constitution's ERA requires taxpayer funded abortion; the | ||||||
3 | Texas Court of
Appeals, Third District, decided Low-Income | ||||||
4 | Women of Texas v. Bost, holding that Texas
constitution's ERA | ||||||
5 | requires taxpayer funded abortion (later reversed); the | ||||||
6 | Illinois Appellate
Court, 1st District, decided Hope Clinic v. | ||||||
7 | Adams, holding that the Illinois constitution's clause
| ||||||
8 | guaranteeing equal protection for sex requires strict and | ||||||
9 | presumably fatal scrutiny to be applied
against the Illinois | ||||||
10 | Parental Notice of Abortion Act (later reversed); and
| ||||||
11 | WHEREAS, The Illinois General Assembly supports passage of | ||||||
12 | the ERA in a modified form, to
ensure ERA's neutrality on | ||||||
13 | taxpayer funded abortion, parental notice prior to an abortion, | ||||||
14 | and
other regulations on abortion; therefore, be it
| ||||||
15 | RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ONE | ||||||
16 | HUNDREDTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, THE SENATE | ||||||
17 | CONCURRING HEREIN, that we hereby urge Congress to adopt anew | ||||||
18 | the ERA, with the common-sense
abortion-neutral language of | ||||||
19 | Congressman Sensenbrenner, and send it to the states for
| ||||||
20 | ratification; and be it further
| ||||||
21 | RESOLVED, That suitable copies of this resolution be | ||||||
22 | presented to the Speaker and Clerk of
the United States House | ||||||
23 | of Representatives, the President Pro Tempore and Secretary of |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | the
United States Senate, and the members of the Illinois | ||||||
2 | Congressional Delegation.
|