(50 ILCS 750/15.3) (from Ch. 134, par. 45.3)
(Text of Section before amendment by P.A. 103-366) (Section scheduled to be repealed on December 31, 2025)
Sec. 15.3. Local non-wireless surcharge. (a) Except as provided in subsection (l) of this Section, the corporate authorities of any municipality or any
county may, subject to the limitations of subsections (c), (d), and (h),
and in addition to any tax levied pursuant to the Simplified Municipal
Telecommunications Tax Act, impose a monthly surcharge on billed subscribers
of network connection provided by telecommunication carriers engaged in the
business of transmitting messages by means of electricity originating within
the corporate limits of the municipality or county imposing the surcharge at
a rate per network connection determined in accordance with subsection (c), however the monthly surcharge shall not apply to a network connection provided for use with pay telephone services.
Provided, however, that where multiple voice grade communications channels
are connected between the subscriber's premises and a public switched network
through private branch exchange (PBX) or centrex type service, a municipality
imposing a surcharge at a rate per network connection, as determined in
accordance with this Act, shall impose: (i) in a municipality with a population of 500,000 or less or in any county, 5 such |
| surcharges per network connection, as defined under Section 2 of this Act, for both regular service and advanced service provisioned trunk lines;
|
|
(ii) in a municipality with a population, prior to March 1, 2010, of 500,000 or more, 5
|
| surcharges per network connection, as defined under Section 2 of this Act, for both regular service and advanced service provisioned trunk lines;
|
|
(iii) in a municipality with a population, as of March 1, 2010, of 500,000 or more, 5
|
| surcharges per network connection, as defined under Section 2 of this Act, for regular service provisioned trunk lines, and 12 surcharges per network connection, as defined under Section 2 of this Act, for advanced service provisioned trunk lines, except where an advanced service provisioned trunk line supports at least 2 but fewer than 23 simultaneous voice grade calls ("VGC's"), a telecommunication carrier may elect to impose fewer than 12 surcharges per trunk line as provided in subsection (iv) of this Section; or
|
|
(iv) for an advanced service provisioned trunk line connected between the subscriber's
|
| premises and the public switched network through a P.B.X., where the advanced service provisioned trunk line is capable of transporting at least 2 but fewer than 23 simultaneous VGC's per trunk line, the telecommunications carrier collecting the surcharge may elect to impose surcharges in accordance with the table provided in this Section, without limiting any telecommunications carrier's obligations to otherwise keep and maintain records. Any telecommunications carrier electing to impose fewer than 12 surcharges per an advanced service provisioned trunk line shall keep and maintain records adequately to demonstrate the VGC capability of each advanced service provisioned trunk line with fewer than 12 surcharges imposed, provided that 12 surcharges shall be imposed on an advanced service provisioned trunk line regardless of the VGC capability where a telecommunications carrier cannot demonstrate the VGC capability of the advanced service provisioned trunk line.
|
|
|
Facility
| VGC's | 911 Surcharges | Advanced service provisioned trunk line | 18-23 | 12 | Advanced service provisioned trunk line | 12-17 | 10 | Advanced service provisioned trunk line | 2-11 | 8 |
|
Subsections (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) are not intended to make any change in the meaning of this Section, but are intended to remove possible ambiguity, thereby confirming the intent of paragraph (a) as it existed prior to and following the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 97th General Assembly.
For mobile telecommunications services, if a surcharge is imposed it shall be
imposed based upon the municipality or county that encompasses the customer's
place of primary use as defined in the Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing
Conformity Act. A municipality may enter into an intergovernmental
agreement with any county in which it is partially located, when the county
has adopted an ordinance to impose a surcharge as provided in subsection
(c), to include that portion of the municipality lying outside the county
in that county's surcharge referendum. If the county's surcharge
referendum is approved, the portion of the municipality identified in the
intergovernmental agreement shall automatically be disconnected from the
county in which it lies and connected to the county which approved the
referendum for purposes of a surcharge on telecommunications carriers.
(b) For purposes of computing the surcharge imposed by subsection (a),
the network connections to which the surcharge shall apply shall be those
in-service network connections, other than those network connections
assigned to the municipality or county, where the service address for each
such network connection or connections is located within the corporate
limits of the municipality or county levying the surcharge. Except for mobile
telecommunication services, the "service address" shall mean the location of
the primary use of the network connection or connections. For mobile
telecommunication services, "service address" means the customer's place of
primary use as defined in the Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Conformity
Act.
(c) Upon the passage of an ordinance to impose a surcharge under this
Section the clerk of the municipality or county shall certify the question
of whether the surcharge may be imposed to the proper election authority
who shall submit the public question to the electors of the municipality or
county in accordance with the general election law; provided that such
question shall not be submitted at a consolidated primary election. The
public question shall be in substantially the following form:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shall the county (or city, village
or incorporated town) of ..... impose YES
a surcharge of up to ...¢ per month per
network connection, which surcharge will
be added to the monthly bill you receive - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
for telephone or telecommunications
charges, for the purpose of installing
(or improving) a 9-1-1 Emergency NO
Telephone System?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
If a majority of the votes cast upon the public question are in favor
thereof, the surcharge shall be imposed.
However, if a Joint Emergency Telephone System Board is to be created
pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement under Section 15.4, the
ordinance to impose the surcharge shall be subject to the approval of a
majority of the total number of votes cast upon the public question by the
electors of all of the municipalities or counties, or combination thereof,
that are parties to the intergovernmental agreement.
The referendum requirement of this subsection (c) shall not apply
to any municipality with a population over 500,000 or to any
county in which a proposition as to whether a sophisticated 9-1-1 Emergency
Telephone System should be installed in the county, at a cost not to
exceed a specified monthly amount per network connection, has previously
been approved by a majority of the electors of the county voting on the
proposition at an election conducted before the effective date of this
amendatory Act of 1987.
(d) A county may not impose a surcharge, unless requested by a
municipality, in any incorporated area which has previously approved a
surcharge as provided in subsection (c) or in any incorporated area where
the corporate authorities of the municipality have previously entered into
a binding contract or letter of intent with a telecommunications carrier to
provide sophisticated 9-1-1 service through municipal funds.
(e) A municipality or county may at any time by ordinance change the
rate of the surcharge imposed under this Section if the new rate does not
exceed the rate specified in the referendum held pursuant to subsection (c).
(f) The surcharge authorized by this Section shall be collected from
the subscriber by the telecommunications carrier providing the subscriber
the network connection as a separately stated item on the subscriber's bill.
(g) The amount of surcharge collected by the telecommunications carrier
shall be paid to the particular municipality or county or Joint Emergency
Telephone System Board not later than 30 days after the surcharge is
collected, net of any network or other 9-1-1 or sophisticated 9-1-1 system
charges then due the particular telecommunications carrier, as shown on an
itemized bill. The telecommunications carrier collecting the surcharge
shall also be entitled to deduct 3% of the gross amount of surcharge
collected to reimburse the telecommunications carrier for the expense of
accounting and collecting the surcharge.
(h) Except as expressly provided in subsection (a) of this Section, on or after the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 98th General Assembly and until December 31, 2017, a municipality with a population of 500,000 or more shall not impose a monthly surcharge per network connection in excess of the highest monthly surcharge imposed as of January 1, 2014 by any county or municipality under subsection (c) of this Section. Beginning January 1, 2018 and until December 31, 2023, a municipality with a population over 500,000 may not impose a monthly surcharge in excess of $5.00 per network connection. On or after January 1, 2024, a
municipality with a population over 500,000 may not impose a
monthly surcharge in excess of $2.50
per network connection.
(i) Any municipality or county or joint emergency telephone system
board that has imposed a surcharge pursuant to this Section prior to the
effective date of this amendatory Act of 1990 shall hereafter impose the
surcharge in accordance with subsection (b) of this Section.
(j) The corporate authorities of any municipality or county may issue,
in accordance with Illinois law, bonds, notes or other obligations secured
in whole or in part by the proceeds of the surcharge described in this
Section.
The State of Illinois pledges and agrees that it will not limit or alter
the rights and powers vested in municipalities and counties by this Section
to impose the surcharge so as to impair the terms of or affect the
security for bonds, notes or other obligations secured in whole or in part
with the proceeds of the surcharge described in this Section. The pledge and agreement set forth in this Section survive the termination of the surcharge under subsection (l) by virtue of the replacement of the surcharge monies guaranteed under Section 20; the State of Illinois pledges and agrees that it will not limit or alter the rights vested in municipalities and counties to the surcharge replacement funds guaranteed under Section 20 so as to impair the terms of or affect the security for bonds, notes or other obligations secured in whole or in part with the proceeds of the surcharge described in this Section.
(k) Any surcharge collected by or imposed on a telecommunications
carrier pursuant to this Section shall be held to be a special fund in
trust for the municipality, county or Joint Emergency Telephone Board
imposing the surcharge. Except for the 3% deduction provided in subsection
(g) above, the special fund shall not be subject to the claims of
creditors of the telecommunication carrier.
(l) Any surcharge imposed pursuant to this Section by a county or municipality, other than a municipality with a population in excess of 500,000, shall cease to be imposed on January 1, 2016.
(Source: P.A. 101-639, eff. 6-12-20; 102-9, eff. 6-3-21.)
(Text of Section after amendment by P.A. 103-366)
(Section scheduled to be repealed on December 31, 2025)
Sec. 15.3. Local non-wireless surcharge.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (l) of this Section, the corporate authorities of any municipality or any
county may, subject to the limitations of subsections (c), (d), and (h),
and in addition to any tax levied pursuant to the Simplified Municipal
Telecommunications Tax Act, impose a monthly surcharge on billed subscribers
of network connection provided by telecommunication carriers engaged in the
business of transmitting messages by means of electricity originating within
the corporate limits of the municipality or county imposing the surcharge at
a rate per network connection determined in accordance with subsection (c), however the monthly surcharge shall not apply to a network connection provided for use with pay telephone services.
Provided, however, that where multiple voice grade communications channels
are connected between the subscriber's premises and a public switched network
through private branch exchange (PBX) or centrex type service, a municipality
imposing a surcharge at a rate per network connection, as determined in
accordance with this Act, shall impose:
(i) in a municipality with a population of 500,000 or less or in any county, 5 such
|
| surcharges per network connection, as defined under Section 2 of this Act, for both regular service and advanced service provisioned trunk lines;
|
|
(ii) in a municipality with a population, prior to March 1, 2010, of 500,000 or more, 5
|
| surcharges per network connection, as defined under Section 2 of this Act, for both regular service and advanced service provisioned trunk lines;
|
|
(iii) in a municipality with a population, as of March 1, 2010, of 500,000 or more, 5
|
| surcharges per network connection, as defined under Section 2 of this Act, for regular service provisioned trunk lines, and 12 surcharges per network connection, as defined under Section 2 of this Act, for advanced service provisioned trunk lines, except where an advanced service provisioned trunk line supports at least 2 but fewer than 23 simultaneous voice grade calls ("VGC's"), a telecommunication carrier may elect to impose fewer than 12 surcharges per trunk line as provided in subsection (iv) of this Section; or
|
|
(iv) for an advanced service provisioned trunk line connected between the subscriber's
|
| premises and the public switched network through a P.B.X., where the advanced service provisioned trunk line is capable of transporting at least 2 but fewer than 23 simultaneous VGC's per trunk line, the telecommunications carrier collecting the surcharge may elect to impose surcharges in accordance with the table provided in this Section, without limiting any telecommunications carrier's obligations to otherwise keep and maintain records. Any telecommunications carrier electing to impose fewer than 12 surcharges per an advanced service provisioned trunk line shall keep and maintain records adequately to demonstrate the VGC capability of each advanced service provisioned trunk line with fewer than 12 surcharges imposed, provided that 12 surcharges shall be imposed on an advanced service provisioned trunk line regardless of the VGC capability where a telecommunications carrier cannot demonstrate the VGC capability of the advanced service provisioned trunk line.
|
|
|
Facility
| VGC's | 911 Surcharges | Advanced service provisioned trunk line | 18-23 | 12 | Advanced service provisioned trunk line | 12-17 | 10 | Advanced service provisioned trunk line | 2-11 | 8 |
|
Subsections (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) are not intended to make any change in the meaning of this Section, but are intended to remove possible ambiguity, thereby confirming the intent of paragraph (a) as it existed prior to and following the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 97th General Assembly.
For mobile telecommunications services, if a surcharge is imposed it shall be
imposed based upon the municipality or county that encompasses the customer's
place of primary use as defined in the Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing
Conformity Act. A municipality may enter into an intergovernmental
agreement with any county in which it is partially located, when the county
has adopted an ordinance to impose a surcharge as provided in subsection
(c), to include that portion of the municipality lying outside the county
in that county's surcharge referendum. If the county's surcharge
referendum is approved, the portion of the municipality identified in the
intergovernmental agreement shall automatically be disconnected from the
county in which it lies and connected to the county which approved the
referendum for purposes of a surcharge on telecommunications carriers.
(b) For purposes of computing the surcharge imposed by subsection (a),
the network connections to which the surcharge shall apply shall be those
in-service network connections, other than those network connections
assigned to the municipality or county, where the service address for each
such network connection or connections is located within the corporate
limits of the municipality or county levying the surcharge. Except for mobile
telecommunication services, the "service address" shall mean the location of
the primary use of the network connection or connections. For mobile
telecommunication services, "service address" means the customer's place of
primary use as defined in the Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Conformity
Act.
(c) Upon the passage of an ordinance to impose a surcharge under this
Section the clerk of the municipality or county shall certify the question
of whether the surcharge may be imposed to the proper election authority
who shall submit the public question to the electors of the municipality or
county in accordance with the general election law; provided that such
question shall not be submitted at a consolidated primary election. The
public question shall be in substantially the following form:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shall the county (or city, village
or incorporated town) of ..... impose YES
a surcharge of up to ...¢ per month per
network connection, which surcharge will
be added to the monthly bill you receive - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
for telephone or telecommunications
charges, for the purpose of installing
(or improving) a 9-1-1 Emergency NO
Telephone System?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
If a majority of the votes cast upon the public question are in favor
thereof, the surcharge shall be imposed.
However, if a Joint Emergency Telephone System Board is to be created
pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement under Section 15.4, the
ordinance to impose the surcharge shall be subject to the approval of a
majority of the total number of votes cast upon the public question by the
electors of all of the municipalities or counties, or combination thereof,
that are parties to the intergovernmental agreement.
The referendum requirement of this subsection (c) shall not apply
to any municipality with a population over 500,000 or to any
county in which a proposition as to whether a sophisticated 9-1-1 Emergency
Telephone System should be installed in the county, at a cost not to
exceed a specified monthly amount per network connection, has previously
been approved by a majority of the electors of the county voting on the
proposition at an election conducted before the effective date of this
amendatory Act of 1987.
(d) A county may not impose a surcharge, unless requested by a
municipality, in any incorporated area which has previously approved a
surcharge as provided in subsection (c) or in any incorporated area where
the corporate authorities of the municipality have previously entered into
a binding contract or letter of intent with a telecommunications carrier to
provide sophisticated 9-1-1 service through municipal funds.
(e) A municipality or county may at any time by ordinance change the
rate of the surcharge imposed under this Section if the new rate does not
exceed the rate specified in the referendum held pursuant to subsection (c).
(f) The surcharge authorized by this Section shall be collected from
the subscriber by the telecommunications carrier providing the subscriber
the network connection as a separately stated item on the subscriber's bill.
(g) The amount of surcharge collected by the telecommunications carrier
shall be paid to the particular municipality or county or Joint Emergency
Telephone System Board not later than 30 days after the surcharge is
collected, net of any network or other 9-1-1 or sophisticated 9-1-1 system
charges then due the particular telecommunications carrier, as shown on an
itemized bill. The telecommunications carrier collecting the surcharge
shall also be entitled to deduct 3% of the gross amount of surcharge
collected to reimburse the telecommunications carrier for the expense of
accounting and collecting the surcharge.
(h) Except as expressly provided in subsection (a) of this Section, on or after the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 98th General Assembly and until December 31, 2017, a municipality with a population of 500,000 or more shall not impose a monthly surcharge per network connection in excess of the highest monthly surcharge imposed as of January 1, 2014 by any county or municipality under subsection (c) of this Section. Beginning January 1, 2018 and until December 31, 2025, a municipality with a population over 500,000 may not impose a monthly surcharge in excess of $5.00 per network connection. On or after January 1, 2026, a
municipality with a population over 500,000 may not impose a
monthly surcharge in excess of $2.50
per network connection.
(i) Any municipality or county or joint emergency telephone system
board that has imposed a surcharge pursuant to this Section prior to the
effective date of this amendatory Act of 1990 shall hereafter impose the
surcharge in accordance with subsection (b) of this Section.
(j) The corporate authorities of any municipality or county may issue,
in accordance with Illinois law, bonds, notes or other obligations secured
in whole or in part by the proceeds of the surcharge described in this
Section.
The State of Illinois pledges and agrees that it will not limit or alter
the rights and powers vested in municipalities and counties by this Section
to impose the surcharge so as to impair the terms of or affect the
security for bonds, notes or other obligations secured in whole or in part
with the proceeds of the surcharge described in this Section. The pledge and agreement set forth in this Section survive the termination of the surcharge under subsection (l) by virtue of the replacement of the surcharge monies guaranteed under Section 20; the State of Illinois pledges and agrees that it will not limit or alter the rights vested in municipalities and counties to the surcharge replacement funds guaranteed under Section 20 so as to impair the terms of or affect the security for bonds, notes or other obligations secured in whole or in part with the proceeds of the surcharge described in this Section.
(k) Any surcharge collected by or imposed on a telecommunications
carrier pursuant to this Section shall be held to be a special fund in
trust for the municipality, county or Joint Emergency Telephone Board
imposing the surcharge. Except for the 3% deduction provided in subsection
(g) above, the special fund shall not be subject to the claims of
creditors of the telecommunication carrier.
(l) Any surcharge imposed pursuant to this Section by a county or municipality, other than a municipality with a population in excess of 500,000, shall cease to be imposed on January 1, 2016.
(Source: P.A. 102-9, eff. 6-3-21; 103-366, eff. 1-1-24.)
|