HB3521 - 104th General Assembly
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | AN ACT concerning criminal law. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | represented in the General Assembly: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | Section 5. The Juvenile Court Act of 1987 is amended by | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | adding Section 5-401.7 as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | (705 ILCS 405/5-401.7 new) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | Sec. 5-401.7. Inadmissibility of unreliable statements by | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | defendants. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | (a) In this Section: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 10 | "Custodial interrogation" means any interrogation (i) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 | during which a reasonable person in the subject's position | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 12 | would consider himself or herself to be in custody and (ii) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 | during which a question is asked that is reasonably likely to | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 | elicit an incriminating response. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 | "Place of detention" means a building or a police station | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 16 | that is a place of operation for a municipal police department | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 17 | or county sheriff's department or other law enforcement agency | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 18 | at which persons are or may be held in detention in connection | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 19 | with criminal charges against those persons or allegations | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 20 | that those persons are delinquent minors. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 21 | (b) Unreliable statements to law enforcement made during a | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 22 | custodial interrogation conducted at a police station or other | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 23 | place of detention by a defendant are inadmissible at trial in | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | any criminal court proceeding or juvenile court proceeding for | ||||||
| 2 | the prosecution of a homicide. | ||||||
| 3 | (c) In any proceeding under this Section, the prosecution | ||||||
| 4 | shall timely disclose prior to any relevant evidentiary | ||||||
| 5 | hearing or trial its intent to introduce a statement made | ||||||
| 6 | during a custodial interrogation conducted at a place of | ||||||
| 7 | detention. At that time, the prosecution must tender any | ||||||
| 8 | electronic recordings of the statement and any documents | ||||||
| 9 | relating to the circumstances under which the statement was | ||||||
| 10 | obtained and any other evidence the State intends to rely upon | ||||||
| 11 | to determine the statement's reliability. | ||||||
| 12 | (d) Before trial, a defendant may move to exclude a | ||||||
| 13 | statement alleged to be unreliable. The defendant shall | ||||||
| 14 | specifically identify the statement or statements alleged to | ||||||
| 15 | be unreliable. | ||||||
| 16 | (e) At the hearing, it shall be the burden of the | ||||||
| 17 | prosecutor to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that | ||||||
| 18 | the statement is reliable. | ||||||
| 19 | (f) When deciding a statement's reliability, a court | ||||||
| 20 | should consider: | ||||||
| 21 | (1) whether the details in the statement fit with the | ||||||
| 22 | evidence known before the interrogation, especially | ||||||
| 23 | details that describe unusual or not easily guessed facts | ||||||
| 24 | of the crime that had not been made public; | ||||||
| 25 | (2) whether the statement provides any new details or | ||||||
| 26 | any new evidence not known before the interrogation that | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | can be independently corroborated after the interrogation; | ||||||
| 2 | (3) whether facts of the crime were disclosed to the | ||||||
| 3 | defendant rather than originated with the defendant; | ||||||
| 4 | (4) whether the defendant recanted the defendant's | ||||||
| 5 | statement at any time and the circumstances of that | ||||||
| 6 | recantation; | ||||||
| 7 | (5) whether the statement was electronically recorded; | ||||||
| 8 | and | ||||||
| 9 | (6) any other information relevant to the reliability | ||||||
| 10 | of the statement. | ||||||
| 11 | Section 10. The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is | ||||||
| 12 | amended by adding Section 103-2.3 as follows: | ||||||
| 13 | (725 ILCS 5/103-2.3 new) | ||||||
| 14 | Sec. 103-2.3. Inadmissibility of unreliable statements by | ||||||
| 15 | defendants. | ||||||
| 16 | (a) In this Section: | ||||||
| 17 | "Custodial interrogation" means any interrogation (i) | ||||||
| 18 | during which a reasonable person in the subject's position | ||||||
| 19 | would consider himself or herself to be in custody and (ii) | ||||||
| 20 | during which a question is asked that is reasonably likely to | ||||||
| 21 | elicit an incriminating response. | ||||||
| 22 | "Place of detention" means a building or a police station | ||||||
| 23 | that is a place of operation for a municipal police department | ||||||
| 24 | or county sheriff's department or other law enforcement agency | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | at which persons are or may be held in detention in connection | ||||||
| 2 | with criminal charges against those persons or allegations | ||||||
| 3 | that those persons are delinquent minors. | ||||||
| 4 | (b) Unreliable statements to law enforcement made during a | ||||||
| 5 | custodial interrogation conducted at a police station or other | ||||||
| 6 | place of detention by a defendant are inadmissible at trial in | ||||||
| 7 | any criminal court proceeding or juvenile court proceeding for | ||||||
| 8 | the prosecution of a homicide. | ||||||
| 9 | (c) In any proceeding under this Section, the prosecution | ||||||
| 10 | shall timely disclose prior to any relevant evidentiary | ||||||
| 11 | hearing or trial its intent to introduce a statement made | ||||||
| 12 | during a custodial interrogation conducted at a place of | ||||||
| 13 | detention. At that time, the prosecution must tender any | ||||||
| 14 | electronic recordings of the statement and any documents | ||||||
| 15 | relating to the circumstances under which the statement was | ||||||
| 16 | obtained and any other evidence the State intends to rely upon | ||||||
| 17 | to determine the statement's reliability. | ||||||
| 18 | (d) Before trial, a defendant may move to exclude a | ||||||
| 19 | statement alleged to be unreliable. The defendant shall | ||||||
| 20 | specifically identify the statement or statements alleged to | ||||||
| 21 | be unreliable. | ||||||
| 22 | (e) At the hearing, it shall be the burden of the | ||||||
| 23 | prosecutor to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that | ||||||
| 24 | the statement is reliable. | ||||||
| 25 | (f) When deciding a statement's reliability, a court | ||||||
| 26 | should consider: | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | (1) whether the details in the statement fit with the | ||||||
| 2 | evidence known before the interrogation, especially | ||||||
| 3 | details that describe unusual or not easily guessed facts | ||||||
| 4 | of the crime that had not been made public; | ||||||
| 5 | (2) whether the statement provides any new details or | ||||||
| 6 | any new evidence not known before the interrogation that | ||||||
| 7 | can be independently corroborated after the interrogation; | ||||||
| 8 | (3) whether facts of the crime were disclosed to the | ||||||
| 9 | defendant rather than originated with the defendant; | ||||||
| 10 | (4) whether the defendant recanted the defendant's | ||||||
| 11 | statement at any time and the circumstances of that | ||||||
| 12 | recantation; | ||||||
| 13 | (5) whether the statement was electronically recorded; | ||||||
| 14 | and | ||||||
| 15 | (6) any other information relevant to the reliability | ||||||
| 16 | of the statement. | ||||||
